Abstract

Rationale

Cannabis use is widespread and has previously been associated with memory impairments. However, the role of cannabis in relation to false memory production, i.e., memories of events that were not experienced, is less well-understood.

Objective

The aim of the current field study was to examine the impact of cannabis use on false memory production.

Methods

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm was used to induce false memories. In this paradigm, participants study word lists that are associatively related to a non-presented word, termed the critical lure. In a later memory test, true recognition rates and false alarm rates toward critical lures and unrelated items are assessed. Memory performance was compared between three groups: regular cannabis consumers who were acutely intoxicated (n = 53), regular cannabis consumers who were sober (n = 50), and cannabis-naïve controls (n = 53). The participants were approached in Dutch coffee shops (cannabis outlets) and cafes and asked to participate in our study. After collecting general information on their cannabis use, they were subjected to the DRM procedure.

Results

Although false memory rates for critical lures did not statistically differ between groups, both intoxicated and sober cannabis consumers falsely recognized more unrelated items than control participants. Also, individuals without a history of cannabis use demonstrated higher memory accuracy compared with the intoxicated group.

Conclusion

It is concluded that cannabis intoxication and history of cannabis use induce a liberal response criterion for newly presented words for which the level of association with previously learned words is low and uncertainty is high.

Details

Title
False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
Author
Kloft, Lilian 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Otgaar, Henry 2 ; Blokland, Arjan 1 ; Garbaciak, Alicja 1 ; Monds, Lauren A 3 ; Ramaekers, Johannes G 1 

 Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands 
 Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Faculty of Law, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 
 Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 
Pages
3439-3450
Publication year
2019
Publication date
Dec 2019
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
00333158
e-ISSN
14322072
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2248025031
Copyright
Psychopharmacology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved., © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.