It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In this study, a double-mismatch allele-specific (DMAS) qPCR SNP genotyping method has been designed, tested and validated specifically for cacao, using 65 well annotated international cacao reference accessions retrieved from the Center for Forestry Research and Technology Transfer (CEFORTT) and the International Cocoa Quarantine Centre (ICQC). In total, 42 DMAS-qPCR SNP genotyping assays have been validated, with a 98.05% overall efficiency in calling the correct genotype. In addition, the test allowed for the identification of 15.38% off-types and two duplicates, highlighting the problem of mislabeling in cacao collections and the need for conclusive genotyping assays. The developed method showed on average a high genetic diversity (He = 0.416) and information index (I = 0.601), making it applicable to assess intra-population variation. Furthermore, only the 13 most informative markers were needed to achieve maximum differentiation. This simple, effective method provides robust and accurate genotypic data which allows for more efficient resource management (e.g. tackling mislabeling, conserving valuable genetic material, parentage analysis, genetic diversity studies), thus contributing to an increased knowledge on the genetic background of cacao worldwide. Notably, the described method can easily be integrated in other laboratories for a wide range of objectives and organisms.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Research unit Molecular Biology, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
2 Research unit Molecular Biology, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Laboratory of Food Technology and Engineering (FTE), Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
3 Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
4 Laboratory of Food Technology and Engineering (FTE), Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
5 Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Bioinformatics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
6 Research unit Molecular Biology, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium