It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Using offshore geodetic observations, we show that a segment of the North Anatolian Fault in the central Sea of Marmara is locked and therefore accumulating strain. The strain accumulation along this fault segment was previously extrapolated from onshore observations or inferred from the absence of seismicity, but both methods could not distinguish between fully locked or fully creeping fault behavior. A network of acoustic transponders measured crustal deformation with mm-precision on the seafloor for 2.5 years and did not detect any significant fault displacement. Absence of deformation together with sparse seismicity monitored by ocean bottom seismometers indicates complete fault locking to at least 3 km depth and presumably into the crystalline basement. The slip-deficit of at least 4 m since the last known rupture in 1766 is equivalent to an earthquake of magnitude 7.1 to 7.4 in the Sea of Marmara offshore metropolitan Istanbul.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
2 GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany; University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
3 Laboratoire Géosciences Océan, Université de Brest and CNRS, Plouzané, France
4 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, INRA, Coll France, CEREGE, Aix-en-Provence, France
5 Faculty of Mines, Department of Geology, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
6 Laboratoire LIENSs, Université de la Rochelle and CNRS, La Rochelle, France; GFZ Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
7 Laboratoire LIENSs, Université de la Rochelle and CNRS, La Rochelle, France
8 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
9 Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Department of Geodesy, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
10 Institut Français de Recherche pour l’Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Département Ressources Physiques et Ecosystèmes de Fond de Mer, Unité des Géosciences Marines, Plouzané, France