Content area

Abstract

Levallois technology is a hallmark of many Middle and Late Pleistocene stone artifact assemblages, but its definition has been much debated. Here we use three-dimensional photogrammetry to investigate the geometric variation among Levallois and discoidal core technologies. We created models of experimental and archaeological stone artifact assemblages to quantitatively investigate the morphologies of Levallois and discoidal core technologies. Our results demonstrate that technological characteristics of Levallois technology can be distinguished from discoidal variants by analyzing the relative volumes and angles of the two flaking surfaces. We apply these methods to a random subset of Middle Paleolithic cores from Skhūl (Israel) and show that, overall, the Skhūl archaeological sample falls in range with the experimental Levallois sample. This study advocates the investigation of core technology on a spectrum to elucidate particular reduction trajectories while maintaining visible outliers and dispersion within an assemblage. Our quantified approach to studying centripetal core technology broadly is particularly applicable in studies related to forager mobility strategy and raw material use. Ultimately, the methods developed here can be used across temporal and geographic boundaries and facilitate attribute-based inter-site comparisons.

Details

Title
Evaluating prepared core assemblages with three-dimensional methods: a case study from the Middle Paleolithic at Skhūl (Israel)
Author
Ranhorn, Kathryn L 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Braun, David R 2 ; Biermann Gürbüz, Rebecca E 3 ; Greiner, Elliot 4 ; Wawrzyniak, Daniel 5 ; Brooks, Alison S 6 

 Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge, MA, USA 
 Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA; Archaeology Department, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa 
 Department of Anthropology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Amherst, NY, USA 
 Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 
 Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA 
 Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA; Human Origins Program, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA 
Pages
3225-3238
Publication year
2019
Publication date
Jul 2019
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
18669557
e-ISSN
18669565
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2258162245
Copyright
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.