It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
A monophyletic group of dinoflagellates, called ‘dinotoms’, are known to possess evolutionarily intermediate plastids derived from diatoms. The diatoms maintain their nuclei, mitochondria, and the endoplasmic reticulum in addition with their plastids, while it has been observed that the host dinoflagellates retain the diatoms permanently by controlling diatom karyokinesis. Previously, we showed that dinotoms have repeatedly replaced their diatoms. Here, we show the process of replacements is at two different evolutionary stages in two closely related dinotoms, Durinskia capensis and D. kwazulunatalensis. We clarify that D. capensis is a kleptoplastic protist keeping its diatoms temporarily, only for two months. On the other hand, D. kwazulunatalensis is able to keep several diatoms permanently and exhibits unique dynamics to maintain the diatom nuclei: the nuclei change their morphologies into a complex string-shape alongside the plastids during interphase and these string-shaped nuclei then condense into multiple round nuclei when the host divides. These dynamics have been observed in other dinotoms that possess permanent diatoms, while they have never been observed in any other eukaryotes. We suggest that the establishment of this unique mechanism might be a critical step for dinotoms to be able to convert kleptoplastids into permanent plastids.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
3 Marine and Continental Waters Program, Institute for Food and Agricultural Research and Technology, Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Catalonia, Spain
4 Marine and Continental Waters Program, Institute for Food and Agricultural Research and Technology, Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Catalonia, Spain; Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
5 Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, West Pomerania, Poland
6 Department of Gene Function and Phenomics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Sizuoka, Japan
7 Department of Biological Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan