Consumption of minimally processed foods as protective factors in the genesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Brazil

Abstract

Background

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common cancer, and two-fifths of cases could be avoided by changing lifestyle and eating habits.

Methods

This multicenter case-control study was conducted under the International Consortium on Head and Neck Cancer and Genetic Epidemiology, coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. This consortium evaluated associations between minimally processed food consumption and the risk of HNC in three Brazilian states.

Results

We evaluated 1740 subjects (847 cases and 893 controls). In multiple analyses including recognized risk factors for HNC, the consumption of apples and pears was associated with reduced risks of oral cavity and laryngeal cancers; the consumption of citrus fruits and fresh tomatoes was associated with a reduced risk of oral cavity cancer; the consumption of bananas was associated with a reduced risk of oropharynx cancer; the consumption of broccoli, cabbage, and collard greens was associated with reduced risks of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers; and the consumption of carrots and fresh fruits was associated with a reduced risk of hypopharyngeal cancer.

Conclusions

The consumption of a heathy diet rich in fruits and vegetables was associated with a reduced risk of HNC. Public policies, including government subsidies, are essential to facilitate logistical and financial access to minimally processed foods, thereby strengthening environments that promote healthy behavior.

About the Authors:

Olívia Perim Galvão De Podestá

Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Postgraduate Program in Sciences of Fundação Antônio Prudente, Cancer Center of A.C.Camargo, São Paulo—SP / BR

Stela Verzinhasse Peres

Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Postgraduate Program in Sciences of Fundação Antônio Prudente, Cancer Center of A.C.Camargo, São Paulo—SP / BR

Luciane Bresciani Salaroli

Roles Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Graduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória—ES / BR

Monica Cattafesta

Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Graduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória—ES / BR

José Roberto Vasconcelos De Podestá

Roles Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Women's Cancer Association Santa Rita de Cássia Hospital, Vitória—ES / BR

Sandra Lúcia Ventorin von Zeidler

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Postgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória—ES / BR

José Carlos de Oliveira

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Association to Combat Cancer in Goiás Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiânia—GO / BR

Luiz Paulo Kowalski

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Postgraduate Program in Sciences of Fundação Antônio Prudente, Cancer Center of A.C.Camargo, São Paulo—SP / BR

Mauro Kasuo Ikeda

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Postgraduate Program in Sciences of Fundação Antônio Prudente, Cancer Center of A.C.Camargo, São Paulo—SP / BR

Paul Brennan

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France

Maria Paula Curado

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Postgraduate Program in Sciences of Fundação Antônio Prudente, Cancer Center of A.C.Camargo, São Paulo—SP / BR

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8172-2483

Introduction

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world, accounting for approximately 6% of all malignancies [1]. The National Cancer Institute of Brazil predicts the occurrence of approximately 31,980 HNC cases in each year of the 2018–2019 biennium, including 14,700 cases in the oral cavity and 7670 cases in the larynx, both of which are more frequent in men [2].

Risk factors for cancers of the mouth, larynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx include alcohol consumption, smoking, human papillomavirus infection, and a nutrient-poor diet [3–9]. Approximately two-fifths of the most common neoplasms may be avoided by lifestyle and dietary modifications [10], and the combination of smoking and alcohol consumption is responsible for almost 80% of the risk of HNC [11]; however, diet is important in the genesis of these tumors, as certain foods play protective roles due to their bioactive compounds and modulators [11–15]. Vegetables and fruits provide micronutrients, dietary fiber, and phytochemicals [8,10], reducing the risk of malignant neoplasias of the oral cavity, larynx, and pharynx [13–15] due to their regulation of the expression and activity of transcription factors, growth factors, inflammatory mediators, and cell cycle intermediates [16].

Minimally processed foods are viewed as protective and include fruits, raw greens, vegetables, roots, seeds, and tubers, as well as some animal products. They are classified according to the extent of processing to increase shelf and storage lives, facilitate or diversify cooking preparation, and/or modify flavor [17]. This food group, according to the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population, should be the basis of a nutritionally balanced, tasty, culturally appropriate diet and for the promotion of a socially and environmentally sustainable food system [17,18]. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate minimally processed food consumption and the risk of developing cancer of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx.

Material and methods

This multicenter case-control study was part of the International Consortium on Head and Neck Cancer and Genetic Epidemiology Study coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Patients were recruited from July 2011 to July 2017 from the Association to Combat Cancer at the Goiás Hospital Araújo Jorge (Goiânia, GO), the A.C. Camargo Cancer Center Hospital (São Paulo, SP) and the Women's Association to Combat Cancer at Santa Rita de Cássia Hospital (Vitória, ES). The study was approved by the Committee on Ethics in Research in Human Beings of the Araujo Jorge Goiania Hospital and the Antônio Prudente Foundation Cancer Hospital of A.C. Camargo Cancer Center (no. 1670/12b), and by the National Council of Research Ethics (no. 16525/2011). The research followed the precepts of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients diagnosed with epidermoid carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx, or hypopharynx who were 18–80 years of age were considered to be eligible. Patients treated previously for cancer, those with more than one tumor, and those with clinical and mental conditions preventing them from responding appropriately to the questionnaire were excluded. All cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were confirmed by histology and classified according to the third revision of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology [19].

Case-control matching

Cases were paired independently with controls according to age and sex. The cases and controls were paired at a ratio of 1:2 for cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx, and at a ratio of 1:3 for hypopharyngeal cancer. Individual participating centers selected hospital or population sources of the controls. Controls in São Paulo were recruited from cancer prevention campaigns, those in Goiânia were patients recruited from hospitals in the state public network that did not specialize in oncology, and controls in Vitoria were non-consanguine companions of patients with cancer. The hospital controls were selected from patients with a restricted set of chronic diseases and other conditions not associated with alcohol or tobacco use (endocrine/metabolic, genitourinary, skin, subcutaneous/musculoskeletal tissue, gastrointestinal, eye/ear/mastoid, and nervous system diseases; trauma; circulatory disorders; indications for minor or plastic surgery; low back pain; and urinary tract infections).

Covariates

The sociodemographic characteristics recorded were self-reported race/skin color ("white" and "non-white") and education level ("illiterate," "elementary school," "high school," and "higher education"). Sex and age group ("less than 60 years" and "greater than or equal to 60 years") were paired variables.

Alcohol consumption was classified as "never drank," "former drinker," and "current drinker." Smoking was classified as "never smoked," "former smoker," and "current smoker."

Oral hygiene was investigated by physical exam (by a trained professional, dentist or head and neck surgeon) and categorized as "good," "reasonable," or "bad," and nutritional status was characterized using the body mass index [BMI; weight (kg) / height (m)2]. For adults (18–59 years), BMIs < 18.5 kg/m2 were classified as low, BMIs of 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 were classified as normal, and BMIs ≥ 25 kg/m2 were taken to indicate overweight [20]; for patients aged > 60 years [21], these categories were defined by BMIs < 23 kg/m2, 23.0–28.0 kg/m2, and >28 kg/m2, respectively.

The habit of consuming minimally processed foods was evaluated according to participants’ reported consumption of the following food items/groups: all vegetables (except potatoes), with the subgroups of raw greens and vegetables; broccoli, cabbage, and collard greens (cruciferous vegetables); and carrots; and all fresh fruit items, with the subgroups of natural fruit juices; apples and pears; citrus fruits (oranges, lemons, and tangerines); fresh tomatoes; and bananas; and rice and beans. The frequency of consumption of these foods was classified as "never or <once a month," "1 to 3 times a month," "1 to 2 times a week," "on most days but not every day," and "every day"; for patients with hypopharyngeal cancer, consumption was classified as "<3 times a month," "1 to 2 times a week" and "almost every day or more" for multiple modeling. The consumption of rice and beans was classified as "do not consume rice and beans or consume little," "consume rice and consume little beans," "consume little rice and consume more beans," and "consume rice and beans almost daily."

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed descriptively by calculating means of absolute and relative frequencies, and applying measures of central tendency and dispersion. The chi-squared test was applied to verify associations between the covariates (sociodemographic, clinical, lifestyle, and nutritional characteristics) and the outcome of cancer. The endpoints considered were the presence of oral cavity, oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer, respectively.

Univariate binary logistic regression analysis (S1 Table) and unconditional binary multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to obtain odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Covariables that presented significant p values (<0.050) and those with p values < 0.200 were included in multiple modeling. A stepwise technique was used, with testing from the lowest to the highest p value. The final model was built with the following assumptions: 1) no change in ORs > 10%; 2) improvement in accuracy by 95% CI; 3) total degrees of freedom allowed for each outcome variable; and 4) quality of the final model, determined by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Food covariates were considered adjustments, with control for the confounding variables of sex and age; alcohol consumption in the oral cavity and hypopharyngeal outcomes. For the outcome of oropharyngeal cancer, the interaction between smoking and alcohol consumption was examined, given the change in magnitude of the event. For hypopharyngeal cancer, modeling was performed separately for sociodemographic/lifestyle and food variables because of the small number of incident cases (n = 43).

A significance level of 5% (p < 0.05) was used. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 23.0.

Results

We recruited 1825 cases and controls initially, of which were excluded by 82 had unspecified HNC, one individual was excluded for being <18 years old, and two for having had received prior treatment for HNC, resulting in a final sample of 1740 subjects (847 cases and 893 controls), including 398 cases of oral cavity cancer, 249 cases of oropharyngeal cancer, 157 cases of laryngeal cancer, and 43 cases of hypopharyngeal cancer.

For all cancers studied, cases and controls differed significantly in terms of educational level, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, and oral hygiene; low educational levels, low weight, smoking, alcohol consumption, and poor oral hygiene were more prevalent among cases. A difference in race/skin color between cases and controls was identified only for the oral cavity (Table 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of cases with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (n = 847) and healthy controls (n = 893).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220067.t001

The consumption of minimally processed foods was associated inversely with cancer of the oral cavity, larynx, pharynx, and hypopharynx (Table 2). The consumption of natural juice and citrus fruits was not associated with hypopharyngeal cancer, and the consumption of rice and beans was not associated with any HNC cancer.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Consumption of minimally processed foods by patients with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers (n = 847) and healthy controls (n = 893).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220067.t002

Oral cavity cancer

Past and current smoking increased the risk of oral cavity cancer occurrence, with ORs of 1.54 (95% CI 1.01–2.34, p = 0.043) and 7.17 (95% CI 4.42–11.12, p < 0.001), respectively, compared with individuals who never smoked. Participants with poor/bad oral hygiene were twice as likely to have oral cavity cancer as were those with good hygiene (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.34–3.42, p = 0.002).

Compared with illiterate participants, those who had completed primary education were 60% less likely to have oral cavity cancer (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23–0.71, p = 0.002), and those with high-school educations were 75% less likely to have this cancer type (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12–0.46, p < 0.001). Subjects who self-reported their race/skin color as non-white had a 58% lesser chance of having oral cavity cancer than were those who identified themselves as white (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30–0.59, p < 0.001). Individuals with low weights had a 3.78 times greater chance of having oral cavity cancer than did those with excess weight (OR 3.78, 95% CI 2.40–5.96, p < 0.001).

Greater consumption of minimally processed foods was associated with a reduced chance of having oral cavity cancer. The consumption of apples and pears on most days reduced this chance by 59% (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22–0.76, p = 0.004), and everyday consumption reduced the chance by 66% (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17–0.71, p = 0.004). Citrus fruit consumption reduced the risk by up to 66% (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17–0.66, p = 0.002). The consumption of fresh tomatoes every day reduced the chance of having oral cavity cancer by 72% (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14–0.56, p < 0.001; Table 3).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Associations of lifestyle and dietary habits with oral cavity cancer, as determined by multiple binary logistic regression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220067.t003

Oropharyngeal cancer

Current smoking and alcohol consumption increased the chance of having oropharyngeal cancer by 18 times compared with never smoking or drinking (OR 18.26, 95% CI 8.19–40.73, p < 0.001). Compared with individuals who never smoked or drank, ORs for oropharyngeal cancer were 4.79 (95% CI 2.24–10.22, p < 0.0001) among individuals who formerly smoked or drank, 3.07 (95% CI 1.34–7.03, p = 0.008) among those who currently smoked but never drank, and 16.22 (95% CI 6.93–37.95, p < 0.001) among former drinkers who currently smoked.

Individuals with poor/bad oral hygiene were twice as likely to have oropharyngeal cancer as were those with good oral hygiene (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.13–3.89, p = 0.022). Individuals of non-white race/skin color had half the chance of having oropharyngeal cancer as did those who identified as white (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32–0.77, p = 0.002). Low-weight individuals were 4.11 times more likely (95% CI 2.19–7.72, p < 0.001) and overweight subjects were 52% less likely (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30–0.77, p = 0.002) to have oropharyngeal cancer than were those with normal BMIs.

The consumption of bananas every day reduced the odds of having oropharyngeal cancer by 77% compared with never consuming bananas (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09–0.55, p = 0.001; Table 4).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Associations of lifestyle and dietary habits with oropharyngeal cancer, as determined by multiple binary logistic regression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220067.t004

Laryngeal cancer

Former and current smoking increased the odds of having laryngeal cancer by 3.93 (95% CI 1.88–8.24, p < 0.001) and 8.18 (95% CI 3.61–18.55, p < 0.001) times, respectively, compared with never smoking. Alcohol consumption in the past increased the chance of having this cancer by 2.23 times (95% CI 1.10–4.54, p = 0.027) relative to never drinking. Compared with normal-weight subjects, those with low weights had an approximately three times greater chance (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.46–5.71, p < 0.001), and overweight subjects had a 54% lesser chance (95% CI 0.32–0.97, p = 0.038) of having laryngeal cancer.

Increased consumption of apples and pears reduced the chance of having laryngeal cancer; consumption on most days or every day reduced this chance by 74% (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10–0.66, p = 0.005) compared with rare or no consumption. Consumption of broccoli, cabbage, and/or collard greens on most days and daily reduced the chance of having laryngeal cancer by 79% (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08–0.57, p = 0.002) and 80% (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06–0.66, p = 0.008), respectively (Table 5).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 5. Associations of lifestyle and dietary habits with laryngeal cancer, as determined by multiple binary logistic regression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220067.t005

Hypopharyngeal cancer

Smoking increased the odds of having hypopharyngeal cancer by almost nine times compared with never smoking (OR 8.74, 95% CI 2.32–32.91, p = 0.001). Primary and secondary education levels reduced the chance of having this type of tumor by 91% relative to illiteracy (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01–0.67, p = 0.019 and OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01–0.60, p = 0.013, respectively). Subjects with low weight had 34.87 times the odds (95% CI 6.52–186.66, p < 0.001), and overweight subjects had a 91% lesser chance (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02–0.35, p = 0.001) of having hypopharyngeal cancer than did those with normal BMIs.

Consumption of broccoli, cabbage, and/or collard greens 1–2 times/week decreased the chance of having hypopharyngeal cancer by 69% (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11–0.87, p = 0.026) compared with consumption of these items fewer than 3 times/month. Likewise, carrot consumption decreased the odds of having this tumor type by 86% (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04–0.44, p = 0.001). Consumption of fresh fruits almost every day or more reduced the chance of having hypopharyngeal cancer by 73% (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08–0.96, p = 0.0.042; Table 6).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 6. Associations of lifestyle and dietary habits with hypopharyngeal cancer, as determined by multiple binary logistic regression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220067.t006

Discussion

In this study, we observed that the consumption of minimally processed foods, especially key protective fruits and vegetables (citrus fruits, tomatoes, cruciferous vegetables, apples, pears, and bananas), reduced the chance of having squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Minimally processed foods contribute to the prevention of chronic noncommunicable diseases, as their consumption results in diets with low energy density and low levels of free sugars, unhealthy fats, and salt, as well as large amounts of fiber [22]. Several mechanisms may be involved in the reduction of cancer risk provided by the consumption of these foods, as the nutrients and phytochemicals that they contain may interfere in different stages of carcinogenesis [16,23].

Evidence has accumulated on the prevention of cancer by bioactive components, such as lycopene from tomatoes, isothiocyanates in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, and monoterpenes from citrus fruit [16], and is supported by the findings of the present study. An analysis of 805 cases of oral and pharyngeal cancer showed that the dietary consumption of flavonoids reduced the probability of developing such tumors by 50% [12] because flavonoids regulate the expression and action of several microRNAs in different cancers [16,24,25]. Likewise, the protective effect found for apples and pears is due to the presence of quercetin, which induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [23]. Lycopene, present in tomatoes, has antioxidant actions, inhibiting the growth of tumor cells in humans and preventing the proinflammatory production of interleukin 8 induced by smoking [26,27], which explain the possible associations found in this study. In a pooled analysis of 10 case-control studies, Leoncini et al. [28] found a 40% reduction in the chance of having cancers of the mouth, pharynx, and larynx in individuals with higher carotenoid consumption.

Cruciferous consumption was associated with a reduction in the risk of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers in this study, probably due to the presence of natural sulfur compounds known as glucosinolates, which are a nutritional source of thiocyanates and isothiocyanates [23,29]. These molecules can block the action of carcinogens and suppress the expression of neoplasia in initiated cancer cells [29], facilitating the detoxification and excretion of carcinogens, protecting against oxidative stress, inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells, and increasing apoptosis [23]. In addition to the systemic protective effects of phytochemicals, polyphenols may exert local actions during the chewing of food through contact with tissues, inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells on the surfaces of epithelial cells and thereby preventing cancer of the mouth [30].

Banana consumption was associated with protective effects for oropharyngeal cancer. This fruit contains several bioactive compounds, such as vitamins, phenolic acids, carotenoids, biogenic amines, and phytosterols, which are highly desirable in the diet because they exert antioxidant effects [31,32]. In addition, bananas are widely appreciated in many countries because of their high nutritional value and low cost [33]. Bananas are the most popular fruit in Brazil, being the most consumed food after rice, beans, coffee, bread, salt, and beef [30].

The protective effects of fresh fruits can be explained by the numerous bioactive compounds present in these foods. In addition to attempts to explain the roles of nutrients and phytochemicals in the genesis and prevention of cancer, interest in the study of dietary patterns and their synergistic effects is increasing [7,34–39], as diets rich in anti-inflammatory agents from various dietary sources may help to reduce the risk of cancers of the mouth and pharynx [36,40,41].

Combined food chemoprevention strategies produce "pharmacodynamic synergy," in which the impact of the phytochemical mixture is more prominent than the impacts of isolated phytochemicals [42]. Tseng [43] demonstrated in 2009 that at least 20% of all cancers can be prevented by the consumption of diets rich in vegetables and fruits (>400 g/day), precisely because these types of food contain mixtures of phytochemicals and act synergistically [43,44]. Many experimental and in vitro studies have not produced the same results as studies assessing individuals’ food consumption due to inherent differences between induced laboratory conditions and actual human physiological conditions [37,45].

In an analysis of 14,852 cases of HNC, the International Consortium for the Epidemiology of Head and Neck Cancer (INHANCE) determined that the highest overall intake of fruits, particularly citrus fruits, apples, and pears, led to the lowest risk of this type of cancer (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43–0.62, p < 0.01). Similarly, individuals with higher vegetable intakes had a lower risk of HNC (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49–0.90, p = 0.01). In addition, the consumption of green salads, lettuce, and fresh tomatoes more than 7 times per week was associated with a lower risk of having this type of tumor [34]. Another study with HNC and smoking showed that higher frequencies of fruit and vegetable intake were associated inversely with the risk of this cancer in all age groups [7].

Our study revealed no significant difference in the risk of the cancers examined related to the consumption of rice and beans. In contrast, Marchioni et al. [14] reported that beans protected against oral cancer, with a significant tendency for risk reduction with increased consumption, in a population from São Paulo. The lack of association in the present study may be due to the high intake of these foods overall in the study population, as rice and beans remain the basis of Brazilian diets [46].

Other risk factors for HNC identified in this study were similar to those found in the literature. In a French multicenter study, subjects with HNC had lower educational levels and greater tobacco use and alcohol consumption than did controls [47]. Individual studies that contributed to the INHANCE consortium documented strong associations between the duration and intensity of tobacco and alcohol use and the risk of HNC; smoking cessation reduced this risk, whereas the effect of alcohol withdrawal was not clear [11].

Smokers and heavy drinkers have higher levels of inflammation markers [48,49], and a phytochemical-rich diet may be more effective in these individuals [41,48]. Cruciferous extracts induce the actions of cytoprotective enzymes, such as glucorapanin, which promote the detoxification of carcinogenic chemical agents, including benzene, aldehydes, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons found in tobacco smoke [50].

Nutritional status at diagnosis is associated with low weight status. According to Magnano et al. [51], malnutrition is a typical characteristic of patients with HNC because they underwent progressive and involuntary weight loss even before cancer treatment. In our study, 31.1% (n = 261) of all cases had malnutrition at diagnosis of HNC.

A higher level of education has been deemed a protective factor for HNC [52–55]. The association of low education, low income, and non-white race/skin color with HNC development has been related to the roles of these factors as social determinants of health, lifestyle, and behavioral factors, food choices, and/or psychosocial factors [56]. A higher level of education was a determinant of better-quality diets among patients with cancer [54]; in turn, poor oral hygiene has been associated with a higher risk of HNC [57], as found in our study.

Few studies have been conducted in Brazil to investigate the association between diet and HNC [7,14,58–61]. However, scientific evidence for the relationships between HNC in different locations and some types of food and nutrients remains insufficient or inconsistent. Several factors may explain this situation and can be considered to be limitations of this work, including factors inherent to case-control studies, such as memory bias, the consumption of foods and nutrients associated with cancer many years before cancer onset, and patients’ modification of their diets during the initial (prediagnosis) phases of the disease [62]. However, our data on the protective effects of minimally processed plant foods against HNC are supported by the strengths of associations, consistency of results, and biological plausibility of the findings.

In addition, this study is among the first to assess the effects of protective foods in terms of HNC risk according to the Food Rating Approach for the Brazilian Population [18]. It is also among the largest multicenter studies of the cancers examined conducted in Brazil; participating centers were in three Brazilian states. Other studies that have investigated dietary associations with the risk of HNC in Brazil have used data only from São Paulo [7,14,58,60,61] or Rio de Janeiro [59]. Moreover, the analyses in our study were subdivided by four HNC locations, in an effort to determine whether the protective role of minimally processed foods differed among these locations; in contrast, previous studies have focused only on oral and oropharyngeal cancers [14,58,60,61] or oral and pharyngeal cancers [59].

Conclusions

In multiple analyses adjusted for smoking, alcohol consumption, poor oral hygiene, and low educational level, the consumption of minimally processed foods reduced the chance of HNC development. The consumption of apples and pears was associated with reduced risks of oral cavity and laryngeal cancers; the consumption of citrus fruits and fresh tomatoes was associated with a reduced risk of oral cavity cancer; the consumption of bananas was associated with a reduced risk of oropharynx cancer; the consumption of broccoli, cabbage, and collard greens was associated with reduced risks of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers; and the consumption of carrots and fresh fruits was associated with a reduced risk of hypopharyngeal cancer. The findings of our study support the adoption of preventive measures for HNC that encourage the consumption of minimally processed foods. Incentives may take the form of public education policies and address nutritional status control, oral hygiene, restriction of alcohol consumption, and cessation of tobacco use. The facilitation of access to minimally processed foods through public policies, such as subsidy provision for home and community gardens and free markets, is essential, and will strengthen the development and consolidation of policies that aim to create environments conducive to healthy behavior.

Supporting information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Table. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220067.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to all members of the International Consortium on Head and Neck Cancer and Genetic Epidemiology, coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and to the participating patients and controls.

Citation: Galvão De Podestá OP, Peres SV, Salaroli LB, Cattafesta M, De Podestá JRV, von Zeidler SLV, et al. (2019) Consumption of minimally processed foods as protective factors in the genesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Brazil. PLoS ONE 14(7): e0220067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220067

References

1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective: continuous update project expert report 2018; 2018. [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Database: figshare [Internet]. Available from: https://www.wcrf.org/sites/default/files/Summary-third-expert-report.pdf.

2. Brazil. Estimating 2018: Incidence of cancer in Brazil / National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva, coordination of prevention and surveillance. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2018.

3. Curado MP, Boyle P. Epidemiology of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma not related to tobacco or alcohol. Curr Opin Oncol. 2013;25: 229–234. pmid:23511666

4. de Munter L, Maasland DH, van den Brandt PA, Kremer B, Schouten LJ. Vitamin and carotenoid intake and risk of head-neck cancer subtypes in the Netherlands Cohort Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102: 420–432. pmid:26156734

5. Young D, Xiao CC, Murphy B, Moore M, Fakhry C, Day TA. Increase in head and neck cancer in younger patients due to human papillomavirus (HPV). Oral Oncol. 2015;51: 727–730. pmid:26066977

6. Rettig EM D'Souza G. Epidemiology of head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24: 379–396. pmid:25979389

7. Toporcov TN, Znaor A, Zhang ZF, Yu GP, Winn DM, Wei Q, et al. Risk factors for head and neck cancer in young adults: a pooled analysis in the INHANCE consortium. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44: 169–185. pmid:25613428

8. Kawakita D, Lee YA, Turati F, Parpinel M, Decarli A, Serraino D, et al. Dietary fiber intake and head and neck cancer risk: a pooled analysis in the international head and neck cancer epidemiology consortium. Int J Cancer. 2017;141: 1811–1821. pmid:28710831

9. Beynon RA, Lang S, Schimansky S, Penfold CM, Waylen A, Thomas SJ, et al. Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking at diagnosis of head and neck cancer and all-cause mortality: results from head and neck 5000, a prospective observational cohort of people with head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2018;143: 1114–1127. pmid:29607493

10. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective: continuous update project expert report 2007; 2007. [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Database: figshare [Internet]. Available from: wcrf.org/int/research-we-fund/continuous-update-project-cup/second-expert-report.

11. Winn DM, Lee YC, Hashibe M, Boffetta P. The INHANCE consortium: toward a better understanding of the causes and mechanisms of head and neck cancer. Oral Dis. 2015;21: 685–693. pmid:25809224

12. Rossi M, Garavello W, Talamini R, Negri E, Bosetti C, Dal Maso L, et al. Flavonoids and the risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer: a case-control study from Italy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16: 1621–1625. pmid:17684136

13. Bradshaw PT, Siega-Riz AM, Campbell M, Weissler MC, Funkhouser WK, Olshan AF. Associations between dietary patterns and head and neck cancer: the Carolina head and neck cancer epidemiology study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175: 1225–1233. pmid:22575416

14. Marchioni DML, Fisberg RM, Filho JFDG, Kowalski LP, Carvalho B, Abrahão M, et al. Dietary factors and oral cancer: a case control study in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, Brazil. Cad Public Health. 2007;23: 553–564.

15. Sun L, Subar AF, Bosire C, Dawsey SM, Kahle LL, Zimmerman TP, et al. Dietary flavonoid intake reduces the risk of head and neck but not esophageal or gastric cancer in US men and women. J Nutr. 2017;147: 1729–1738. pmid:28724656

16. Nosrati N, Bakovic M, Paliyath G. Molecular mechanisms and pathways as targets for cancer prevention and progression with dietary compounds. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18: 2050.

17. Monteiro C, Cannon G, Levy R, Moubarac J, Jaime P, Martins A. NOVA. The star shines bright. World Nutr. 2016;7: 28–38.

18. Brazilian Ministry of Health. Dietary guidelines for the Brazilian population. Available in Portuguese, and in Spanish and english translations. Brasília: Ministry of Health; 2014.

19. World Health Organization, Fritz A, e C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, et al. International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

20. World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory. Overweight and Obesity. 2000. [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Database: figshare [Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/overweight/en/.

21. Pan American Health Organization, Division of Promotion and Protection of Health (HPP). Multicentric Health Beinestar and Aging Survey (SABE) in Latin America the Caribbean: Preliminary Report [Internet]. In: XXXVI Meeting of the Health Research Advisory Committee; 9–11 Jun 2001. 2001 [cited Jan 15]. Available from: www.opas.org/program/sabe.htm.

22. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac JC, Levy RB, Louzada MLC, Jaime PC. The UN decade of nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21: 5–17. pmid:28322183

23. Niedzwiecki A, Roomi MW, Kalinovsky T, Rath M. Anticancer efficacy of polyphenols and their combinations. Nutrients. 2016;8: E552. pmid:27618095

24. Cui J, Zhou B, Ross SA, Zempleni J. Nutrition, microRNAs, and human health. Adv Nutr. 2017;8: 105–112. pmid:28096131

25. Ross SA, Davis CD. MicroRNA, nutrition, and cancer prevention. Adv Nutr. 2011;2: 472–485. pmid:22332090

26. Sakhi AK, Bohn SK, Smeland S, Thoresen M, Smedshaug GB, Tausjo J, et al. Postradiotherapy plasma lutein, alpha-carotene, and beta-carotene are positively associated with survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nutr Cancer. 2010;62: 322–328. pmid:20358469

27. Aghajanpour M, Nazer MR, Obeidavi Z, Akbari M, Ezati P, Kor NM. Functional foods and their role in cancer prevention and health promotion: a comprehensive review. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7: 740–769. pmid:28469951

28. Leoncini E, Edefonti V, Hashibe M, Parpinel M, Cadoni G, Ferraroni M, et al. Carotenoid intake and head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis in the international head and neck cancer epidemiology consortium. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31: 369–383. pmid:25930054

29. Zamora-Ros R, Beraud V, Franceschi S, Cayssials V, Tsilidis KK, Boutron-Ruault MC, et al. Consumption of fruits, vegetables and fruit juices and differentiated thyroid carcinoma risk in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) study. Int J Cancer. 2018;142: 449–459. pmid:28688112

30. Chang HP, Sheen LY, Lei YP. The protective role of carotenoids and polyphenols in patients with head and neck cancer. J Chin Med Assoc. 2015;78: 89–95. pmid:25306067

31. Lim YY, Lim TT, Tee JJ. Antioxidant properties of several tropical fruits: a comparative study. Food Chem. 2007;103: 1003–1008.

32. Singh B, Singh JP, Kaur A, Singh N. Bioactive compounds in banana and their associated health benefits—a review. Food Chem. 2016;206: 1–11. pmid:27041291

33. Fungo R, Pillay M. β-Carotene content of selected banana genotypes from Uganda. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10: 5423–5430.

34. Chuang SC, Jenab M, Heck JE, Bosetti C, Talamini R, Matsuo K, et al. Diet and the risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis in the INHANCE consortium. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23: 69–88.

35. Bradbury KE, Appleby PN, Key TJ. Fruit, vegetable, and fiber intake in relation to cancer risk: findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100 Suppl 1: 394S–398S.

36. Shivappa N, Hebert JR, Rosato V, Garavello W, Serraino D, La Vecchia C. Inflammatory potential of diet and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer in a large case-control study from Italy. Int J Cancer. 2017;141: 471–479. pmid:28340515

37. Zubair H, Azim S, Ahmad A, Khan MA, Patel GK, Singh S, et al. Cancer chemoprevention by phytochemicals: nature's healing touch. Molecules. 2017;22: 395.

38. Alam MN, Almoyad M, Huq F. Polyphenols in colorectal cancer: current state of knowledge including clinical trials and molecular mechanism of action. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018: 4154185. pmid:29568751

39. Kapinova A, Kubatka P, Golubnitschaja O, Kello M, Zubor P, Solar P, et al. Dietary phytochemicals in breast cancer research: anticancer effects and potential utility for effective chemoprevention. Environ Health Prev Med. 2018;23: 36. pmid:30092754

40. Galvao-Moreira LV, da Cruz MC. Oral microbiome, periodontitis and risk of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2016;53: 17–19. pmid:26684542

41. Mazul AL, Shivappa N, Hebert JR, Steck SE, Rodriguez-Ormaza N, Weissler M, et al. Proinflammatory diet is associated with increased risk of squamous cell head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2018;143: 1604–1610.

42. Ullah M, Ahmad A. Critical dietary factors in cancer chemoprevention. Switzerland: Springer; 2016.

43. Tseng M. Diet, cancer and public health nutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12: 737–738. pmid:19454137

44. World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations. Expert report on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. WHO technical report series 916. Geneva: WHO/FAO; 2003.

45. Subbaramaiah K, Sue E, Bhardwaj P, Du B, Hudis CA, Giri D, et al. Dietary polyphenols suppress elevated levels of proinflammatory mediators and aromatase in the mammary gland of obese mice. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013;6: 886–897.

46. Costa LML, Martins AP, Canella DS, Baraldi LG, Levy RB, Claro RM, et al. Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49: 38. pmid:26176747

47. Radoi L, Paget-Bailly S, Cyr D, Papadopoulos A, Guida F, Tarnaud C, et al. Body mass index, body mass change, and risk of oral cavity cancer: results of a large population-based case-control study, the ICARE study. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24: 1437–1448. pmid:23677332

48. Aldaham S, Foote JA, Chow HH, Hakim IA. Smoking status effect on inflammatory markers in a randomized trial of current and former heavy smokers. Int J Inflam. 2015;2015: 439396. pmid:26366318

49. Volpato S, Pahor M, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Guralnik JM, Kritchevsky SB, et al. Relationship of alcohol intake with inflammatory markers and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in well-functioning older adults: the health, aging, and body composition study. Circulation. 2004;109: 607–612. pmid:14769682

50. Bauman JE, Zang Y, Sen M, Li C, Wang L, Egner PA, et al. Prevention of carcinogen-induced oral cancer by sulforaphane. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2016;9: 547–557.

51. Magnano M, Mola P, Machetta G, Maffeis P, Forestiero I, Cavagna R, et al. The nutritional assessment of head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272: 3793–3799. pmid:25534287

52. Conway DI, Brenner DR, McMahon AD, Macpherson LM, Agudo A, Ahrens W, et al. Estimating and explaining the effect of education and income on head and neck cancer risk: INHANCE consortium pooled analysis of 31 case-control studies from 27 countries. Int J Cancer. 2015;136: 1125–1139. pmid:24996155

53. Bryere J, Menvielle G, Dejardin O, Launay L, Molinie F, Stucker I, et al. Neighborhood deprivation and risk of head and neck cancer: a multilevel analysis from France. Oral Oncol. 2017;71: 144–149. pmid:28688682

54. Kane K, Ilic S, Paden H, Lustberg M, Grenade C, Bhatt A, et al. An evaluation of factors predicting diet quality among cancer patients. Nutrients. 2018;10: E1019. pmid:30081543

55. Stanford-Moore G, Bradshaw PT, Weissler MC, Zevallos JP, Brennan P, Anantharaman D, et al. Interaction between known risk factors for head and neck cancer and socioeconomic status: the carolina head and neck cancer study. Cancer Causes Control. 2018;29: 863–873. pmid:30069657

56. Krieger N. Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30: 668–677. pmid:11511581

57. Hashim D, Sartori S, Brennan P, Curado MP, Wunsch-Filho V, Divaris K, et al. The role of oral hygiene in head and neck cancer: results from international head and neck cancer epidemiology (INHANCE) consortium. Ann Oncol. 2016;27: 1619–1625. pmid:27234641

58. Marchioni DM, Gattas GJ, Curioni OA, Carvalho MB. Interaction between dietary intake and GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in head and neck cancer risk: a case-control study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27: 379–387. pmid:21359474

59. Toledo ALAD, Koifman RJ, Koifman S, Marchioni DML. Dietary patterns and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer: a case-control study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2010;26: 135–142. pmid:20209217

60. Toporcov TN, Biazevic MG, Rotundo LD, de Andrade FP, de Carvalho MB, Brasileiro RS, et al. Consumption of animal-derived foods and mouth and oropharyngeal cancer. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;32: 185–191. pmid:23183558

61. Toporcov TN, Tavares GE, Rotundo LD, Vaccarezza GF, Biazevic MG, Brasileiro RS, et al. Do tobacco and alcohol modify protective effects of diet on oral carcinogenesis? Nutr Cancer. 2012;64: 1182–1189. pmid:23163847

62. Gonzalez CA, Riboli E. Diet and cancer prevention: where we are, where we are going. Nutr Cancer. 2006;56: 225–231. pmid:17474869