Evaluating ecosystem processes in willow short rotation coppice bioenergy plantations

Abstract

Despite a growing body of research linking bioenergy cultivation to changing patterns of biodiversity, there has been remarkably little interest in how bioenergy plantations affect key ecosystem processes underpinning important ecosystem services. In this study, we compare how the processes of predation by ground arthropods and litter decomposition varied between Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) willow bioenergy plantations and alternative land-uses: arable and set-aside (agricultural land taken out of production). We deployed litter bags to measure variation in decomposition, and a prey removal assay coupled with pitfall traps and direct searches to investigate variation in predation pressure. Decomposition rate was higher in willow SRC and set-aside than in cereal crops. Willow SRC had the highest abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropod predators, but land-use had no detectable influence on predation of fly pupae or the combined activity-density of the two principal Coleoptera families (carabids and staphylinids). Overall, our study demonstrates that the conversion of arable land to SRC may have implications for the rate of some, but not all, ecosystem processes, and highlights the need for further research in this area.

References Ameixa O, Kindlmann P (2008) Agricultural policy-induced landscape changes: effects on carabid abundance and their biocontrol potential. European Journal of Entomology, 105, 467–476. Amichev BY, Kurz WA, Smyth C, van Rees KCJ (2012) The carbon implications of large-scale afforestation of agriculturally marginal land with short-rotation willow in Saskatchewan. Global Change Biology: Bioenergy, 4, 70–87. Balog A, Markó V, Imre A (2009) Farming system and habitat structure effects on rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) assembly in Central European apple and pear orchards. Biologia, 64, 343–349. Bengtsson J, Nilsson SG, Franc A, Menozzi P (2000) Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 132, 39–50. Birkhofer K, Bezemer TM, Bloem J et al. (2008) Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: Implications for soil quality, biological control and productivity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40, 2297–2308. Björkman C, Bommarco R, Eklund K, Höglund S (2004) Harvesting disrupts biological control of herbivores in a short-rotation coppice system. Ecological Applications, 14, 1624–1633. Cunningham MD, Bishop JD, Mckay HV, Sage RB(2004) ARBRE monitoring-ecology of short rotation coppice. The Game Conservancy Trust report for DTI, DTI publication URN 04/1079. Curry JP, Byrne D, Schmidt O (2002) Intensive cultivation can drastically reduce earthworm populations in arable land. European Journal of Soil Biology, 38, 127–130. Danielsen F, Beukema H, Burgess ND et al. (2009) Biofuel plantations on forested lands: double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate. Conservation Biology, 23, 348–358. Dauber J, Purtauf T, Allapach A, Frisch J, Voigtländer K, Volkmar W (2005) Local vs. landscape control on diversity: a test using surface-dwelling soil macroinvertebrates of differing mobility. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 14, 213–221. Dauber J, Jones MB, Stout JC (2010) The impact of biomass crop cultivation on temperate biodiversity. Global Change Biology: Bioenergy, 2, 289–309. Don A, Osborne B, Hastings A, Skiba U et al. (2012) Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon, Global Change Biology: Bioenergy, 4, 372–391, doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x. Doncaster CP, Davey AJH (2007) Analysis of variance and covariance: how to choose and construct models for the life sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN-13: 9780521684477. Fargione JE, Plevin RJ, Hill JD (2010) The ecological impact of biofuels. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 41, 351–377. Fayle TM, Turner EC, Snaddon JL, Chey VK, Chung AYC, Eggleton P, Foster WA (2010) Oil palm expansion into rain forest greatly reduces ant biodiversity in canopy, epiphytes and leaf-litter. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 337–345. Fletcher RJ, Robertson BA, Evans J, Doran PJ, Alavalapati JRR, Schemske DW (2011) Biodiversity conservation in the era of biofuels: risks and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 161–168. Forup ML, Henson KSE, Craze PG, Memmott J (2008) The restoration of ecological interactions: plant-pollinator networks on ancient and restored heathland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 742–752. Fountain MT, Thomas RS, Brown VK, Gange AC, Murray PJ, Symondson WOC (2009) Effects on nutrient and insecticide treatments on invertebrate numbers and predation on slugs in an upland grassland: a monoclonal antibody-based approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 131, 145–153. Gardiner MA, Tuell JK, Isaacs R, Gibbs J, Ascher JS, Landis DA (2010) Implications of three biofuel crops for beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. Bioenergy Research, 3, 6–19. Garthwaite DG, Barker I, Parrish G, Smith L, Chippindale C, Pietravalle S (2011) Pesticide usage survey report 235, Arable crops in Great Britain 2010. DEFRA, SEERAD. Available at: http://www.fera.defra.gov.uk/plants/pesticideUsage/documents/arable2006.pdf (accessed 10 December 2012) Hartwood JD, Phillips SW, Lello J et al. (2009) Invertebrate biodiversity affects predator fitness and hence potential to control pests in crops. Biological Control, 51, 499–506. Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 191–218. Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ et al. (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35. IEA Bioenergy (2009) Bioenergy-A sustainable and reliable energy source: a review of status and prospects, report for IEA. Available at: http://www.ieabioenergy.com/LibItem.aspx?id=6479 (accessed 1 December 2012). Kazakou E, Violle C, Roumet C, Pintor C, Gimenez O, Garnier E (2009) Litter quality and decomposability of species from a Mediterranean succession depend on leaf traits but not on nitrogen supply. Annals of Botany, 104, 1151–1161. Landis DA, Werling BP (2010) Arthropods and biofuel production systems in North America. Insect Science, 17, 220–236. Lang A (2000) The pitfalls of pitfalls: a comparison of pitfall traps catches and absolute density estimates of epigeal invertebrates predators in arable land. Anzeiger für Schälingskunde, 73, 99–106. Lavelle P, Decaèns T, Aubert M et al. (2006) Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, S3–S15. Lewis JGE (1964) The food and reproductive cycles of the centipedes lithobius Variegatus and Lithobius Forficatus in Yorkshire woodland. Journal of Zoology, 144, 269–284. Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. BioScience, 56, 311–323. Lovei GL, Sunderland KD (1996) Ecology and behaviour of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 231–256. Lys JA (1995) Observation of epigeic predators and predation on artificial prey in a cereal field. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 75, 265–272. Makeschin F (1994) Effects of energy forestry on soils. Biomass and Bioenergy, 6, 63–79. Meehan TD, Hurlbert AH, Gratton C (2010) Bird communities in future bioenergy landscapes of the upper midwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 18533–18538. Menalled FD, Lee JC, Landis DA (1999) Manipulating carabid beetle abundance alters prey removal rates in corn fields. BioControl, 43, 441–456. Menz MHM, Phillips RD, Winfree R, Kremen C, Aizen MA, Johnson SD, Dixon KW (2011) Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends in Plant Science, 16, 4–12. Minor MA, Cianciolo JM (2007) Diversity of soil mites (Acari: Oribatida, Mesostigmata) along a gradient of land use types in New York. Applied Soil Ecology, 35, 140–153. Moonen AC, Bàrberi P (2008) Functional biodiversity: an agroecosystem approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 127, 7–21. Rowe RL, Street N, Taylor G (2009) Indentifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 271–290. Rowe RL, Hanley ME, Goulson D, Clarke D, Doncaster CP, Taylor G (2011) Potential benefits of commercial willow short rotation coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 325–336. Sage RB (2008) High invertebrate biodiversity in willow short rotation coppice can be protected when controlling chrysomelid pest by using a spatially targeted insecticide application. Proceeding of the crop protection in Northern Britain. 33–38 Sage RB, Tucker K (1998) Integrated crop management of SRC plantation to maximise crop value, wildlife benefits and other added value opportunities. The Game Conservancy Trust report for DTI. DTI publication ETSU B/W2/00400. Sage RB, Cunningham MD, Boatman N (2006) Birds in willow short-rotation coppice compared to other arable crops in central England and a review of bird census data from energy crops in the UK. Ibis, 148, 184–197. Šlapokas T, Granhall U (1991) Decomposition of willow-leaf litter in a short-rotation forest in relation to fungal colonization and palatability for earthworms. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 10, 241–248. Snyder WE, Snyder GB, Finke DL, Straub CS (2006) Predator biodiversity strengthens herbivore suppression. Ecology Letters, 9, 789–796. Speight MR, Lawton JH (1976) The influence of weed-cover on mortality imposed on artificial prey by predatory ground beetles in cereal fields. Oecologia, 23, 211–233. Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P et al. (2009) Ecological impacts of early 21^st century agricultural change in Europe—a review. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 22–46. Thomas CFG, Brown NJ, Kendall DA (2006) Carabid movement and vegetation density: implications for interpreting pitfall trap data from split-field trials. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 113, 51–61. Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science, 277, 1300–1302. Tylianakis JM, Romo CM (2010) Natural enemy diversity and biological control: making sense of the context-dependency. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 657–668. Tyndall JC, Schulte LA, Hall RB, Grubh KR (2011) Woody biomass in the U.S. cornbelt? constraints and opportunities in the supply. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 1561–1571. Valentine J, Duller CJ, Hinton-Jones M et al. (2009) The development of sustainable heat and power fuelled by biomass from short rotation coppice in Wales. Aberystwyth University Report of the Helyg i Gymru / Willow for Wales 2004-2008 project. Volk TA, Abrahamson LP, Nowak CA, Smart LB, Tharakan PJ, Whitea EH (2006) The development of short-rotation willow in the northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 715–727. Ward D, New T, Yen A (2001) Effects of pitfall trap spacing on the abundance, richness and composition of invertebrate catches. Journal of Insect Conservation, 5, 47–53. Werling BP, Meehan TD, Robertson BA, Gratton C, Landis DA (2011) Biocontrol potential varies with changes in biofuel-crop plant communities and landscape perenniality. Global Change Bioenergy: Biology, 3, 347–356.