An evolutionary perspective on leaf economics: phylogenetics of leaf mass per area in vascular plants

Abstract

In plant leaves, resource use follows a trade-off between rapid resource capture and conservative storage. This “worldwide leaf economics spectrum” consists of a suite of intercorrelated leaf traits, among which leaf mass per area, LMA, is one of the most fundamental as it indicates the cost of leaf construction and light-interception borne by plants. We conducted a broad-scale analysis of the evolutionary history of LMA across a large dataset of 5401 vascular plant species. The phylogenetic signal in LMA displayed low but significant conservatism, that is, leaf economics tended to be more similar among close relatives than expected by chance alone. Models of trait evolution indicated that LMA evolved under weak stabilizing selection. Moreover, results suggest that different optimal phenotypes evolved among large clades within which extremes tended to be selected against. Conservatism in LMA was strongly related to growth form, as were selection intensity and phenotypic evolutionary rates: woody plants showed higher conservatism in relation to stronger stabilizing selection and lower evolutionary rates compared to herbaceous taxa. The evolutionary history of LMA thus paints different evolutionary trajectories of vascular plant species across clades, revealing the coordination of leaf trait evolution with growth forms in response to varying selection regimes.

References Ackerly, D. D., and R. Nyffeler. 2004. Evolutionary diversification of continuous traits: phylogenetic tests and application to seed size in the california flora. Evol. Ecol. 18:249–272. Anderson, C. L., K. Bremer, and E. M. Friis. 2005. Dating phylogenetically basal eudicots using rbcL sequences and multiple fossil reference points. Am. J. Bot. 92:1737–1748. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161:105–121. Bell, C. D., D. E. Soltis, and P. S. Soltis. 2010. The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. Am. J. Bot. 97:1296–1303. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B 57:289. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. 2004. The evolution of supertrees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:315–322. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, and A. I. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745. Bremer, K., E. M. Friis, and B. Bremer. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic dating of asterid flowering plants shows early cretaceous diversification. Syst. Biol. 53:496–505. Bromham, L., M. Woolfit, M. S. Y. Lee, and A. Rambaut. 2002. Testing the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies. Evolution 56:1921–1930. Butler, M. A., and A. A. King. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164:683–695. Cantino, P. D., J. A. Doyle, S. W. Graham, W. S. Judd, R. G. Olmstead, D. E. Soltis, et al. 2007. Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon 56:822–846. Chaw, S.-M., C. L. Parkinson, Y. Cheng, T. M. Vincent, and J. D. Palmer. 2000. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97:4086–4091. Cornelissen, J. H. C., S. Lavorel, E. Garnier, S. Diaz, N. Buchmann, D. E. Gurvich, et al. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51:335–380. Cornwell, W. K., M. Westoby, D. S. Falster, R. G. FitzJohn, B. C. O'Meara, M. W. Pennell, et al. 2014. Functional distinctiveness of major plant lineages. J. Ecol. 102:345–356. Díaz, S., J. Hodgson, K. Thompson, M. Cabido, J. Cornelissen, A. Jalili, et al. 2004. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J. Veg. Sci. 15:295–304. Davies, T. J., T. G. Barraclough, M. W. Chase, P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and V. Savolainen. 2004. Darwin's abominable mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 101:1904–1909. Davies, J., E. M. Wolkovich, N. J. B. Kraft, N. Salamin, J. M. Allen, T. R. Ault, et al. 2013. Phylogenetic conservatism in plant phenology. J. Ecol. 101:1520–1530. Diniz-Filho, J. A. 2001. Phylogenetic autocorrelation under distinct evolutionary processes. Evolution 55:1104–1109. Donovan, L. A., H. Maherali, C. M. Caruso, H. Huber, and H. de Kroon. 2011. The evolution of the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:88–95. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1–15. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160:712–726. Garland, T., and R. Diaz-Uriarte. 1999. Polytomies and phylogenetically independent contrasts: examination of the bounded degrees of freedom approach. Syst. Biol. 48:547–558. Garnier, E., and G. Laurent. 1994. Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species. New Phytol. 128:725–736 Gittleman, J., and M. Kot. 1990. Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Zool. 39:227–241. Grime, J. 2001. Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester and New York. Grime, J., K. Thompson, R. Hunt, J. Hodgson, J. Cornelissen, I. Rorison, et al. 1997. Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79:259–281. Hansen, T. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341–1351. Hansen, T. F., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404–1417. IPNI. 2008. International Plant Names Index. Available at http://www.ipni.org/index.html. (accessed 8 December 2008). Jacobs, B. F., J. D. Kingston, and L. L. Jacobs. 1999. The origin of grass-dominated ecosystems. Ann. Missouri Botanical Garden 86:590–643. Janssen, T., and K. Bremer. 2004. The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800+ rbcL sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146:385–398. Kattge, J., S. Díaz, S. Lavorel, I. C. Prentice, P. Leadley, G. Bönisch. et al. 2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Glob. Change Biol. 17:2905–2935. Kerkhoff, A. J., W. F. Fagan, J. J. Elser, B. J. Enquist. et al. 2006. Phylogenetic and growth form variation in the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus in the seed plants. Am. Nat. 168:E103–E122. Kraft, N. J. B., W. K. Cornwell, C. O. Webb, and D. D. Ackerly. 2007. Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. Am. Nat. 170:271–283. Lambers, H., and H. Poorter. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23:187–261. Lanfear, R., S. Y. W. Ho, J. T. Davies, A. T. Moles, L. Aarssen, N. G. Swenson, et al. 2013. Taller plants have lower rates of molecular evolution. Nat. Comm. 4:1879. Leebens-Mack, J., T. Vision, E. Brenner, J. E. Bowers, S. Cannon, M. J. Clement, et al. 2006. Taking the first steps towards a standard for reporting on phylogenies: minimum information about a phylogenetic analysis (MIAPA). OMICS 10:231–237. Losos, J. B. 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol. Lett. 11:995–1003. Moles, A. T., D. D. Ackerly, C. Webb, J. Tweddle, J. Dickie, and M. Westoby. 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science 307:576–580. Moles, A. T., D. I. Warton, L. Warman, N. G. Swenson, S. W. Laffan, A. E. Zanne, et al. 2009. Global patterns in plant height. J. Ecol. 97:923–932. Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884. Paradis, E., and J. Claude. 2002. Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. J. Theor. Biol. 218:175–185. Pierce, S., G. Brusa, I. Vagge, and B. E. L. Cerabolini. 2013. Allocating CSR plant functional types: the use of leaf economics and size traits to classify woody and herbaceous vascular plants. Funct. Ecol. 27:1002–1010. Poorter, H., U. Niinemets, L. Poorter, I. J. Wright, and R. Villar. 2009. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol. 182:565–588. Reich, P. B., M. B. Walters, and D. S. Ellsworth. 1997. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 94:13730–13734. Reich, P. B., I. J. Wright, and C. H. Lusk. 2007. Predicting leaf physiology from simple plant and climate attributes: a global GLOPNET analysis. Ecol. Appl. 17:1982–1988. Ricklefs, R. E., and S. S. Renner. 1994. Species richness within families of flowering plants. Evolution 48:1619–1636. Rothwell, G. W., L. Grauvogel-Stamm, and G. Mapes. 2000. An herbaceous fossil conifer: gymnospermous ruderals in the evolution of Mesozoic vegetation. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 156:139–145. Smith, S. A., and M. J. Donoghue. 2008. Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 322:86–89. Smith, A. R., K. M. Pryer, E. Schuettpelz, P. Korall, H. Schneider, and P. C. Wolf. 2006. A classification for extant ferns. Taxon 55:705–731. Smith, S. A., J. M. Beaulieu, A. Stamatakis, and M. J. Donoghue. 2011. Understanding angiosperm diversification using small and large phylogenetic trees. Am. J. Bot. 98:404–414. Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above species level. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA. Stevens, P. F. 2001. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 7, May 2006. Webb, C., D. Ackerly, and S. Kembel. 2007. Phylocom. Version 3.41. Available at http://www.phylodiversity.net/phylocom/. (accessed 17 February 2009). Westoby, M., D. Falster, A. T. Moles, P. Vesk, and I. J. Wright. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:125–159. Wikström, N., and P. Kenrick. 2001. Evolution of lycopodiaceae (Lycopsida): estimating divergence times from rbcL gene sequences by use of nonparametric rate smoothing. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19:177–186. Wikström, N., V. Savolainen, and M. W. Chase. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 268:2211–2220. Wright, I. J., P. B. Reich, M. Westoby, D. D. Ackerly, Z. Baruch, F. Bongers, et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827. Zanne, A. E., D. C. Tank, W. K. Cornwell, J. M. Eastman, S. A. Smith, R. G. FitzJohn, et al. 2013. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature, doi: 10.1038/nature12872.