A fundamental study revisited: Quantitative evidence for territory quality in oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) using GPS data loggers

Abstract

A fundamental study by Ens et al. (1992, Journal of Animal Ecology, 61, 703) developed the concept of two different nest-territory qualities in Eurasian oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus, L.), resulting in different reproductive successes. “Resident” oystercatchers use breeding territories close to the high-tide line and occupy adjacent foraging territories on mudflats. “Leapfrog” oystercatchers breed further away from their foraging territories. In accordance with this concept, we hypothesized that both foraging trip duration and trip distance from the high-tide line to the foraging territory would be linearly related to distance between the nest site and the high tide line. We also expected tidal stage and time of day to affect this relationship. The former study used visual observations of marked oystercatchers, which could not be permanently tracked. This concept model can now be tested using miniaturized GPS devices able to record data at high temporal and spatial resolutions. Twenty-nine oystercatchers from two study sites were equipped with GPS devices during the incubation periods (however, not during chick rearing) over 3 years, providing data for 548 foraging trips. Trip distances from the high-tide line were related to distance between the nest and high-tide line. Tidal stage and time of day were included in a mixing model. Foraging trip distance, but not duration (which was likely more impacted by intake rate), increased with increasing distance between the nest and high-tide line. There was a site-specific effect of tidal stage on both trip parameters. Foraging trip duration, but not distance, was significantly longer during the hours of darkness. Our findings support and additionally quantify the previously developed concept. Furthermore, rather than separating breeding territory quality into two discrete classes, this classification should be extended by the linear relationship between nest-site and foraging location. Finally, oystercatcher′s foraging territories overlapped strongly in areas of high food abundance.

References Armonies, W., & Reise, K. (1999). On the population development of the introduced razor clam Ensis americanus near the island of Sylt (North Sea). Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 52, 291–300. Bates, D. & Maechler, M. (2009) lme4: linear mixed-eVects models using S4 classes. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html Boersma, P. D., & Rebstock, G. A. (2009). Foraging distance affects reproductive success in Magellanic penguins. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 375, 263–275. Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, H. H., & White, J.-S. (2008). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 127–135. Bruinzeel, L. W., van de Pol, M., & Trierweiler, C. (2006). Competitive abilities of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) occupying territories of different quality. Journal of Ornithology, 147, 457–463. Brzorad, J. N., Maccarone, A. D., & Stone, H. M. (2015). A telemetry-based study of great egret (Ardea alba) nest-attendance patterns, food-provisioning rates, and foraging activity in Kansas, USA. Waterbirds, 38, 162–172. de Vlas, S. J., Bunskoeke, A. E. J., Ens, B., & Hulscher, J. B. (1996). Tidal changes in the choice of Nereis diversicolor or Macoma balthica as main prey species in the diet of the oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus. Ardea, 84A, 105–116. Ens, B. J., Kersten, M., Brenninkmeijer, A., & Hulscher, J. B. (1992). Territory quality, parental effort and reproductive success of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus). Journal of Animal Ecology, 61, 703–715. Ens, B. J., van de Pol, M., & Goss-Custard, J. D. (2014). Chapter eight – The study of career decisions: Oystercatchers as social prisoners. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 46, 343–420. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2011) ArcGIS v. 10. Redlands, CA: ESRI. Faraway, J. J. (2006). Extending the linear model with R. Generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heg, D., Ens, B. J., van der Jegd, H. P., & Bruinzeel, L. W. (2000). Local dominance and territorial settlement of nonbreeding oystercatchers. Behaviour, 137, 473–530. Hull, C. L., Kaiser, G. W., Lougheed, C., Lougheed, L., Boyd, S., & Cooke, F. (2001). Intraspecific variation in commuting distance of marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus): Ecological and energetic consequences of nesting further inland. The Auk, 118, 1036–1046. Hulscher, J. B. (1996). Food and feeding behaviour. In J. D. Goss-Custard (Ed.), The oystercatcher. From individuals to populations (pp. 7–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hulsman, K., Zalucki, M. P., & Iedema, A. (1996). Searching behavior and diet of oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus pairs feeding in their territories. Ardea, 84A, 131–139. Kersten, M. (1996). Time and energy budgets of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus occupying territories of different quality. Ardea, 84A, 291–310. Kersten, M., & Visser, W. (1996). Food intake of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus by night measured with an electronic nest balance. Ardea, 84A, 57–72. Leopold, M. F., van Elk, J. F., & van Heezik, Y. M. (1996). Central place foraging in oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus: Can parents that transport mussels Mytilus edulis to their young profit from size selection? Ardea, 84A, 311–325. Paiva, V., Geraldes, P., Rodrigues, I., Melo, T., Melo, J., & Ramos, J. A. (2015). The foraging ecology of the endangered Cape Verde shearwater, a sentinel species for marine conservation off West Africa. PLoS ONE, 10, e0139390. Phillips, R., Xavier, J. C., & Croxall, J. P. (2003). Effects of satellite transmitters on albatrosses and petrels. The Auk, 120, 1082–1090. R Development Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org Schwagmeyer, P. L., & Mock, D. W. (2008). Parental provisioning and offspring fitness: Size matters. Animal Behaviour, 75, 291–298. Schwemmer, P., & Garthe, S. (2011). Spatial and temporal patterns of habitat use by Eurasian oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) in the eastern Wadden Sea revealed using GPS data loggers. Marine Biology, 158, 541–550. Schwemmer, P., Güpner, F., Adler, S., Klingbeil, K., & Garthe, S. (2016). Modelling small-scale foraging habitat use in breeding Eurasian oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) in relation to prey distribution and environmental predictors. Ecological Modelling, 320, 322–333. Shamoun-Baranes, J., Bom, R., van Loon, E. E., Ens, B. J., Oosterbeek, K., & Bouten, W. (2012). From sensor data to animal behaviour: An oystercatcher example. PLoS ONE, 7, e37997. Shoji, A., Aris-Brosou, S., Fayet, A., Padget, O., Perrins, C., & Guilford, T. (2015). Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: Empirical evidence supported by a simple model. Journal of Experimental Biology, 218, 2116–2123. Sitters, H. (2000) The role of night-feeding in shorebirds in an estuarine environment with specific reference to mussel-feeding oystercatchers. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford. Sutherland, W. J. (1982). Do oystercatchers select the most profitable cockles? Animal Behaviour, 30, 857–861. Swennen, C., Leopold, M. F., & Bruijn, L. L. M. (1989). Time-stressed oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, can increase their intake rate. Animal Behaviour, 38, 8–22. van de Pol, M., Bakker, T., Saaltink, D.-J., & Verhulst, S. (2006a). Rearing conditions determine offspring survival independent of egg quality: A cross-foster experiment with oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus). Ibis, 148, 203–210. van de Pol, M., Bruinzeel, L. W., Heg, D., van der Jeugd, H. P., & Verhulst, S. (2006b). A silver spoon for a golden future: Long-term effects of natal origin on fitness prospects of oystercatchers. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 616–626. van Oers, K., Kohn, G. M., Hinde, C. A., & Naguib, M. (2015). Parental food provisioning is related to nestling stress response in wild great tit nestlings: Implications for the development of personality. Frontiers in Zoology, 12(Suppl 1), S10. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/12/S1/S10 Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S. New York, NY: Springer. Whiteside, M. A., Sage, R., & Madden, J. R. (2015). Diet complexity in early life affects survival in released pheasants by altering foraging efficiency, food choice, handling skills and gut morphology. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84, 1480–1489. Whittingham, M. J., Stephens, P. A., Bradbury, R. B., & Freckleton, R. P. (2006). Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 1182–1189. Wilson, R. P., Pütz, K., Peters, G., Culik, B., Scolaro, J. A., Charrassin, J.-B., & Ropert-Coudert, Y. (1997). Long-term attachment of transmitting and recording devices to penguins and other seabirds. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 101–106.