All you can eat: is food supply unlimited in a colonially breeding bird?

Abstract

Food availability is generally considered to determine breeding site selection and therefore plays an important role in hypotheses explaining the evolution of colony formation. Hypotheses trying to explain why birds join a colony usually assume that food is not limited, whereas those explaining variation in colony size suggest that food is under constraint. In this study, we investigate the composition and amount of food items not eaten by the nestlings and found in nest burrows of colonially nesting European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster). We aimed to determine whether this unconsumed food is an indicator of unlimited food supply, the result of mistakes during food transfer between parents and chicks or foraging selectivity of chicks. Therefore, we investigated the amount of dropped food for each nest in relation to reproductive performance and parameters reflecting parental quality. Our data suggest that parents carry more food to the nest than chicks can eat and, hence, food is not limited. This assumption is supported by the facts that there is a positive relationship between dropped food found in a nest and the number of fledglings, nestling age, and chick health condition and that the amount of dropped food is independent of colony size. There is variation in the amount of dropped food within colonies, suggesting that parent foraging efficiency may also be an important determinant. Pairs nesting in the center of a colony performed better than those nesting on the edge, which supports the assumption that quality differences between parents are important as well. However, dropped food cannot be used as an indicator of local food availability as (1) within-colony variation in dropped food is larger than between colony variation and, (2) the average amount of dropped food is not related to colony size.

References Belskaja, G. S. 1976. O reproduktivnom cykle i pitanii zolotistoj shurky v Turkmenii. Ornitologija 12:105–111. Bonnot, T. W., J. J. Millspaugh, and M. A. Rumble. 2009. Multi-scale nest-site selection by black-backed woodpeckers in outbreaks of mountain pine beetles. Forest Ecol. Manag. 259:220–228. Brown, C. R. 1986. Cliff swallow colonies as information centers. Science 234:83–85. Brown, C. R. 1988. Enhanced foraging efficiency through information centers: a benefit of coloniality in cliff swallows. Ecology 69:602–613. Brown, C. R., and M. B. Brown. 1996. Coloniality in the Cliff Swallow. The effect of group size on social behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Brown, C. R., and M. B. Brown. 2001. Avian coloniality: progress and problems. Pp. 1–82 in V. Nolan Jr, C. F. Thompson, eds. Current ornithology, vol. 16. Plenum Press, New York. Brown, C. R., M. B. Brown, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Nest placement relative to food and its influence on the evolution of avian coloniality. Am. Nat. 139:205–217. Brown, C. R., M. B. Brown, and K. R. Brazeal. 2008. Familiarity with breeding habitat improves daily survival in colonial cliff swallows. Anim. Behav. 76:1201–1210. Burger, J. 1985. Habitat selection in temperate marsh-nesting birds. Pp. 253–281 in M. L. Cody, ed. Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA. Carpenter, F. L. 1975. Bird haematocrits: effects of high altitude and strength of flight. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 50A:415–417. Cramp, S. 1985. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, IV. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. Cunningham, C. J., M. G. Courage, and T. P. Quinn. 2013. Selecting for the phenotypic optimum: size-related trade-offs between mortality risk and reproductive output in female sockeye salmon. Funct. Ecol. 27:1233–1243. Danchin, E., and R. H. Wagner. 1997. The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:342–347. Davies, S., and P. Deviche. 2014. At the crossroads of physiology and ecology: food supply and the timing of avian reproduction. Horm. Behav. 66:41–55. Douglas, D. J. T., D. M. Evans, and S. M. Redpath. 2008. Selection of foraging habitat and nestling diet by Meadow Pipits Anthus pratensis breeding on intensively grazed moorland. Bird Study 55:290–296. Drobyshev, I., M. Niklasson, M. J. Mazerolle, and Y. Bergeron. 2014. Reconstruction of a 253-year long mast record of European beech reveals its association with large scale temperature variability and no long-term trend in mast frequencies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 192–193:9–17. Ekman, J. 1989. Group size in dominance-structured populations. Ornis Scand. 20:86–88. Fretwell, S. D., and H. L. Jr Lucas. 1970. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta. Biotheor. 19:1–36. Furness, R. W., and T. R. Birkhead. 1984. Seabird colony distributions suggest competition for food supplies during the breeding season. Nature 311:655–656. Gessaman, J. A., J. A. Johnson, and S. W. Hoffmann. 1986. Haematocrits and erythrocyte numbers for Cooper's and sharp-shinned hawks. Condor 98:95–96. Gibbs, J. P., S. Woodward, M. L. Hunter, and A. E. Hutchinson. 1987. Determinants of great blue heron colony distribution in coastal Maine. Auk 10:38–47. Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N., and K. M. Bauer. 1980. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas Vol. 9. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden. Gori, D. F. 1988. Colony-facilitated foraging in Yellow-headed Blackbirds: experimental evidence for information transfer. Ornis Scand. 19:224–230. Grant, R. A., E. A. Chadwick, and T. Halliday. 2009. The lunar cycle: a cue for amphibian reproductive phenology? Anim. Behav. 78:349–357. Greene, E. 1987. Individuals in an Osprey colony discriminate between high and low quality information. Nature 329:239–241. Griffin, L. R., and C. J. Thomas. 2000. The spatial distribution and size of rook (Corvus frugilegus) breeding colonies is affected by both the distribution of foraging habitat and intercolony competition. Proc. R. Soc. B 267:1146–1467. Gustafsson, L., D. Nordling, M. S. Andersson, B. C. Sheldon, and A. Qvarnström. 1994. Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 346:323–331. Harrison, G. J., and L. R. Harrison. 1986. Clinical avian medicine and surgery. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, London, Toronto. Helbig, A. 1982. The feeding ecology of a pair of European Bee-eaters (Merops apiaster) in northwestern Germany. Vogelwelt 103:161–175. Herényi, M., L. Z. Garamszegi, R. Hargitai, G. Hegyi, B. Rosivall, E. Szöllosi, et al. 2014. Laying date and polygyny as determinants of annual reproductive success in male collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis): a long-term study. Naturwissenschaften 101:305–312. Hoi, H., and M. Hoi-Leitner. 1997. An alternative route to coloniality in the bearded tit: females pursue extra-pair fertilizations. Behav. Ecol. 8:113–119. Hoi, H., A. Darolova, C. König, and J. Kristofík. 1998. The relation between colony size, breeding density and ectoparasite loads of adult European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster). Ecoscience 5:156–163. Hoi, H., C. Hoi, J. Kristofik, and A. Darolova. 2002. Reproductive success decreases with colony size in the European bee-eater. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 14:99–110. Hoi, H., A. Kristin, F. Valera, and C. Hoi. 2004. Clutch enlargement in Lesser Gray Shrikes (Lanius minor) in Slovakia when food is superabundant: a maladaptive response? Auk 121:557–564. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in Brewer′s Blackbirds (Euphagus cyanocephalus). Ecology 49:682–694. Horváth, G., M. H. Fischer, and T. Székely. 1992. The delivery of surplus prey to the nest by a pair of Bee-eaters (Merops apiaster). Ornis Hung. 2:11–16. Ille, R., and H. Hoi. 1995. Factors influencing fledgling survival in the Marsh Warbler Acrocephalus palustris: food and vegetation density. Ibis 137:586–589. Kerth, G., and K. Reckardt. 2003. Information transfer about roosts in female Bechstein's bats: an experimental field study. Proc. R. Soc. B 270:511–515. Koenig, L. 1959. Die Brutfürsorge des heimischen Bienenfressers. Mitt. Biol. Stat. Wilhelminenberg 2:50–54. Krištín, A. 1994. Breeding biology and diet of the bee-eater (Merops apiaster) in Slovakia. Biologia 49:273–279. Krištofík, J., P. Mašán, and Z. Šustek. 1996. Ectoparasites of bee-eater (Merops apiaster) and arthropods in its nests. Biologia 51:557–570. Lack, D. 1968. Ecological adaptation for breeding in birds. Methuen, London. Lessells, C. M., and P. T. Boag. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121. Lessells, C. M., M. I. Avery, and J. R. Krebs. 1994. Nonrandom dispersal of kin: why do European Bee-eaters (Merops apiaster) brothers nest close together? Behav. Ecol. 5:105–113. Minias, P., K. Kaczmarek, T. Janiszewski, and Z. Wojciechowski. 2011. Spatial variation in clutch size and egg size within a colony of Whiskered Terns (Chlidonias hybrida). Wilson J. Ornithol. 123:486–491. Mitrus, C. 2006. The influence of male age and phenology on reproductive success of the red-breasted flycatcher (Ficedula parva Bechst.). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 43:358–365. Møller, A. P. 1987. Advantages and disadvantages of coloniality in the Swallows, Hirundo rustica. Anim. Behav. 35:819–832. Morse, D. H. 1980. Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London. Mowat, G., D. C. Heard, and C. J. Schwarz. 2013. Predicting grizzly bear density in western North America. PLoS ONE 8:e82757. Økland, B., A. M. Liebhold, O. N. Bjørnstad, N. Erbilgin, and P. Krokene. 2005. Are bark beetle outbreaks less synchronous than forest Lepidoptera outbreaks? Oecologia 146:365–372. Petrescu, A., and C. Adam. 2001. Interspecific relations in the populations of Merops apiaster L. (Aves: Coraciiformes) of Southern Romania. Trav. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Grigore Antipa 43:305–322. Randík, A. 1961. Príspevok k postembryonálnemu vývoju včelárika zlatého (Merops apiaster L.). Folia Zool. 10:59–67. Reichhof, J. H. 2014. Ornis. Das Leben der Vögel. C. H. Beck Verlag, München. Richner, H., and P. Heeb. 1995. Is the information center hypothesis a flop? Adv. Study Behav. 24:1–45. Richner, H., and P. Heeb. 1996. Communal life: honest signaling and the recruitment center hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. 7:115–118. Shields, W. M., J. R. Crook, M. L. Hebbletwaithe, and S. S. Wiles-Ehmann. 1988. Ideal free coloniality in the Swallows. Pp. 189–228 in C. N. Slobodchikoff, ed. The ecology of social behaviour. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Smith, P. A., H. G. Gilchrist, and J. N. M. Smith. 2007. Effects of nest habitat, food, and parental behavior on shorebird nest success. Condor 109:15–31. Svensson, L. 1992. Identification guide to European passerines. British Trust for Ornithology, Stockholm. Ursprung, J. 1979. Zur Ernährungsbiologie ostösterreichischer Bienenfresser (Merops apiaster). Egretta 22:4–17. Van Klink, R., F. S. Mandema, J. P. Bakker, and J. M. Tinbergen. 2014. Foraging site choice and diet selection of Meadow Pipits Anthus pratensis breeding on grazed salt marshes. Bird Study 61:101–110. Vergara, P., J. I. Aguirre, and M. Fernández-Cruz. 2007. Arrival date, age and breeding success in white stork Ciconia ciconia. J. Avian Biol. 38:573–579. Ward, P., and A. Zahavi. 1973. The importance of certain assemblages of bird as information centers for food-findings. Ibis 115:517–534. Wiens, J. A. 1989. The ecology of bird communities. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K. Zahavi, A., and A. Zahavi. 1997. The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.