Abstract
The spatial distribution and density of different weed species were monitored during a long-term survey over a period of 9 years on a 5.8 ha arable field and related to soil properties. Weed seedlings were determined every year in spring on a regular grid with 429 observation points (15 × 7.5 m; net study area = 4 ha). Dominant weed species were Chenopodium album, Polygonum aviculare, Viola arvensis and different grass weeds, clearly dominated by Alopecurus myosuroides. A non-invasive electromagnetic induction survey was conducted to evaluate available water capacity directly in the field at high spatial resolution. Further soil properties were evaluated following the minimum-invasive approach with soil sampling and subsequent mid-infrared spectroscopy. Plant available nutrients were analysed with conventional lab methods. Redundancy analysis served to describe the effect of soil properties, different years and field crops on weed species variability. Seven soil properties together explained 30.7% of the spatial weed species variability, whereas 28.2% was explained by soil texture, available water capacity and soil organic carbon. Maps for site-specific weed management were created based on soil maps. These maps permit several benefits for precision crop protection, such as a better understanding of soil–weed inter-relations, improved sampling strategies and reduction in herbicide use.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Hbirkou Christine 2 ; Dicke Dominik 3 ; Gerhards, Roland 4 ; Welp Gerhard 1 1 University of Bonn, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) – Soil Science and Soil Ecology, Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.10388.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2240 3300)
2 University of Bonn, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) – Soil Science and Soil Ecology, Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.10388.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2240 3300); Federal Office for Agriculture and Food, Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.423734.5)
3 University of Bonn, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) – Crop Science, Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.10388.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2240 3300); Regional Administrative Authority Gießen, Plant Protection Service Hesse, Wetzlar, Germany (GRID:grid.10388.32)
4 University of Hohenheim, Department of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, Stuttgart, Germany (GRID:grid.9464.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2290 1502)





