1. Introduction
Due to the adverse health effects of NO2 [1], monitoring ambient NO2 concentrations as well as NO2 emissions from vehicles is of interest for citizens, researchers, and legislative purposes [2,3,4,5]. WHO recommends an hourly mean of 200μg/m−3(106.4ppb) and an annual mean of 40μg/m−3(21.3 ppb) not to be exceeded [1]. A variety of sensing principles exist for the sensing of NO2. For example, electrochemical and metal oxide sensors are low-cost, but lack sensitivity, selectivity, and long-term stability [6]. On the other hand, chemiluminescence detectors are expensive and large in size, but offer reliable measurements and are commonly used to measure NO2 concentrations for legislative purposes [5]. Further, optical sensors exist, which provide high spectral selectivity by choosing a light source that matches one or more absorption bands of NO2. Among those are photoacoustic and photothermal sensing concepts.
Photoacoustic spectroscopy uses intensity or wavelength modulated light sources, which match one ore more absorption bands of the gas of interest, exciting transitions into higher molecular energy levels. Subsequent collisional deactivation leads to the production of a fast decaying thermal and a propagating, slowly decaying acoustic wave [7]. The detection of the acoustic wave, usually after acoustically resonant amplification, is utilized in photoacoustic spectroscopy [8,9,10] and quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy [11,12,13,14].
This work focuses on an interferometric detection scheme, where the temperature change is measured by a refractive index change, induced by the absorption-based heating. As an excitation source, we use an intensity modulated 450 nm laser. The generated refractive index change is measured by means of a fiber-coupled Fabry–Pérot interferometer as the sensing element. Previous publications have demonstrated noise equivalent absorptions of1.3×10−7cm−1W/Hzwith intensity modulation for NO2 (equal to 700ppb for 30 mW average laser power) [15] and1.8×10−6cm−1W/Hz [16] or7.5×10−9cm−1W/Hz [17], with wavelength modulation for detection of SO2 . Similar normalized noise equivalent absorptions (NNEAs) can be achieved with microstructured hollow-core fibers in combination with photothermal interferometry [18,19]. The response of hollow-core fiber gas sensors, however, is diffusion limited and response times for long, high-sensitivity fibers are usually limited to several tens of seconds [18,20]. Exceptions with response times down to 3 s and detection limits of7.4×10−5 cm−1 for methane have been reported for short fibers [18,21], but lacking statements about the laser power coupled into the fiber prohibit a comparison to other methods.
In this work, we demonstrate sensing of NO2 by photothermal interferometry, utilizing a membrane-free optical microphone as interferometer. The1σdetection limit for 1sintegration time is 348 ppb, equal to a normalized noise equivalent absorption of7.5×10−8cm−1W/Hz. The work is meant to demonstrate the advantages of photothermal interferometry for NO2, such as miniaturization potential of the sensing volume, fast response times, and a robust setup.
2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Photothermal Interferometry
In this work, photothermal interferometry (PTI) is realized with a fiber-coupled Fabry–Pérot interferometer (FPI). Intensity modulation of the 450 nm excitation laser produces a thermal wave, with a temperature change directly proportional to the concentration of NO2 [22]. The thermal wave is heavily damped, and is therefore only observed close to the probe beam [7]. The local heating leads to a change in refractive indexΔn , described by the Clausius–Mosotti equation [22], withΔTtemperature rise andTabsabsolute temperature of the gas:
Δn=−(n−1)ΔTTabs.
Due to the constant gas flow through the cell, incremental heating of the gas sample due to the excitation laser can be neglected and constant absolute temperature of the gas can be assumed in our experiments. Hence, the detected change in refractive index is directly proportional to the NO2 concentration within the FPI cavity.
The FPI used for this work measures the intensity of the reflected probe laser. The reflected intensityIr is given by [23]
Ir=Ii1−11+Fsin2(δ/2),
whereIiis the incident intensity and F is the finesse of the mirrors. The phase shiftδdepends on the refractive index in the cavity n, the distance between the mirrors d, and the wavelengthλas
δ=4πndλ.
Changes in n change the phase shiftδand, thus, the reflected intensityIr.
2.2. Experimental Setup
For this work, a commercial optical microphone was used as detector, which consists of a fiber-coupled FPI cavity, machined as a rigid structure, which offers low sensitivity to mechanical vibrations [24]. The FPI is formed by a machined opening with semitransparent mirror surfaces, each approximately1.5mm ×1.5mm in size, which are facing parallel to each other at a distance of approximately3.3mm. A 1550nm probe laser of 1 mW optical power is reflected back and forth between the mirrors, and the reflected intensity is measured [24]. The probe laser is of approximately Gaussian shape, with 205μm full width at half maximum within the cavity, and the reflectivity of the etalon mirrors is in the range of 0.6 [25]. The commercial microphone head comes with protective membranes covering the cavity, which were removed to allow for a free gas exchange and an overlap of the probe and excitation beams (cf. Figure 1).
The optical microphone is placed in a 3D-printed cell with a sample volume smaller than 9cm3 (Figure 1). The cell was optimized with multiphysical simulations to suppress unwanted acoustic resonances. The beam of the excitation laser (blue) is focused through a window and horizontally centered to cross the probe laser of the optical microphone at the position of maximum intensity. A neutral density (ND) filter is mounted opposite the window to attenuate the excitation beam. A 40 mW continuous-wave optical power laser module (Laser Components GmbH, Olching, Germany: FLEXPOINT® Dot Laser Module) with 450 nm wavelength serves as excitation laser. At this wavelength, NO2 yields high absorption with little cross-sensitivity to other gases. Also, this wavelength is above the photodissociation threshold [26].
The experimental setup allows to study the sensor response for different concentrations of NO2, flow rates, and modulation frequencies. This is shown in Figure 2. Gas mixtures were produced with a temperature stabilized custom gas diluter based on binary weighted critical orifices [27], which offer low uncertainties over a broad range of dilution ratios. The NO2 gas cylinder contains a mixture of NO2 and synthetic air (Messer Austria GmbH, Gumpoldskirchen, Austria:19.2ppm NO2), which was further diluted with synthetic air (Messer Austria GmbH: Synthetic Air, Scientific). The flow rate to the PTI cell is controlled by a mass flow controller (MFC; Vögtlin, Aesch, Switzerland: Model GSC-B).
The signal from the optical microphone control unit (XARION Laser Acoustics GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Eta 250 Ultra—settings: Cutoff frequency 100 Hz, gain 20 dB) is recorded with a data acquisition card (National Instruments, Austin, TX, United States: Model PXI-6281) at 250 ksps and post-processed on a personal computer (PC). The same chassis carrying the PXI-6281 also houses a function generator (National Instruments: Model PXI-5402). The function generator provides the square-wave modulation signal (duty cycle 50%) for the excitation laser. The PTI signal is filtered with a digital lock-in amplifier, realized in LabVIEW code on a PC, with an integration time of 1s. Due to the high sampling rate and limited buffer size of the DAQ card, data acquisition and modulation is stopped and restarted after each measurement to obtain a constant phase relation.
To investigate the sensitivity of the FPI and the signal to mechanical vibrations, the sensor was mounted on a platform connected to an electrodynamic shaker (TIRA GmbH, Schalkau, Germany: TIRAvib S502). Applied vertical accelerations and vibration spectral densities were measured with a piezoelectric accelerometer (PCB Piezotronics Inc., Depew, NY, United States: 333B30) placed next to the cell mounting, as shown in Figure 3. In this configuration the operating sensor was exposed to two different broadband quasi-random vibration distributions over the frequency range of 1 Hz–500 Hz—characteristic for highway truck vibration exposure [28]—to test mobile operation of the PTI sensor. The sensor was exposed to the acceleration spectra at different root mean square accelerations for several minutes and signal noise was recorded at multiple points in time. Additionally, the sensor was accelerated sinusoidally and maximum tolerable vertical accelerations (insignificantly increased signal noise) at a range of frequencies between 10 Hz and 300 Hz were determined. Due to the low anticipated effect on the noise level, the interferometer interrogation unit was not exposed to the vibrations.
3. Results 3.1. Influence of Flow Rate on Sensor Noise
The selection of the flow rate is a balance of response time and detection limit, as higher flow rates offer faster gas exchange rates, but are associated to higher flow noise, which negatively effect the detection limit. Figure 4 shows the noise spectrum of the flow noise, measured by the optical microphone without the excitation laser being switched on. The noise spectrum was calculated as the Welch power spectral density estimate with a0.5sHanning window. The flow rate was varied between0.2slpm and 4 slpm. Only a slight increase in noise is seen up to flow rates of 1 slpm, but higher flow rates significantly increase present1/fα noise [29] and are accompanied by flow-rate-dependent tonal noise.
Due to the small cell volume of less than 9 cm3, a flow rate of0.5slpm with a nominal gas exchange rate of ≈1 s/cell volume was considered sufficient with a 1sintegration time, and was used in the subsequent measurements.
3.2. Selection of the Optimal Modulation Frequency
From Figure 4, the additional presence of flow-rate-independent noise around 800 Hz is visible, and a higher modulation frequency should be chosen. However, as the photothermal signal is inversely proportional to the modulation frequency [22], a low modulation frequency is desired. Therefore, the signal with19.2ppm NO2 (black circles) and the background noise with synthetic air (blue diamonds) was recorded with the lock-in amplifier for different modulation frequencies (Figure 5a). The inverse signal strength of the photothermal signal can nicely be seen (black circles). To find the optimal modulation frequency, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated (black dots in Figure 5b). Due to the variation in the calculated SNR values, a moving average filter was applied (blue curve) and a modulation frequency of1.4kHz, in the region where best results were achieved, was selected.
3.3. Limit of Detection and Long Term Stability
The linearity of the PTI sensor was confirmed by applying concentrations ranging from 606ppbto19.2ppm NO2 to the sensor. The PTI signal, as a function of applied NO2 concentration, is shown in Figure 6. Each data point was averaged for approximately 40 values, i.e., 40 s. All signals are background-corrected with respect to their phase. The sensitivity was determined to be(0.149±0.002)mV/ppm−1from a weighted linear regression. The coefficient of determination for the fit isR2=0.999.
Long-term stability was investigated by calculating the Allan deviation for the signal at constant flow of synthetic air. The corresponding plot is shown in Figure 7. Even though the sensor was mounted on an optical table without vibration isolation, no interferences from mechanical vibrations were observed, due to the rigid structure of the FPI.
From Figure 7, it can be seen that the1σdetection limit is 348ppbfor 1saveraging time. The detection limit can be further improved to 75ppb(10s) and 26ppb(100s), by using longer averaging times. The increase in standard deviation after approximately 200s , and the therefore limited maximum integration time, stems from the laser module, which is not temperature stabilized (cf. Appendix A). This, however, could be easily improved by changing to a temperature stabilized laser. The optical microphone itself uses a feedback current to stabilize the wavelength of the probe laser to maintain a steady operating point, i.e., compensating for slow temperature and pressure changes [24].
The normalized noise equivalent absorption was calculated by assuming a Gaussian wavelength distribution around 450 nm with FWHM of0.5 nm, and using the corresponding absorption coefficient from the HITRAN database [30]. For 1sintegration time of the lock-in amplifier, this corresponds to an NNEA of7.5×10−8cm−1W/Hz.
Low sensitivity of the PTI sensor to mechanical vibrations is essential for mobile applications and is usually hard to achieve for interferometric setups. Results of the vibration analysis, however, suggest low sensitivity of the proposed interferometric sensor concept, due to the rigid structure of the FP cavity. Figure 8a shows the applied acceleration spectral densities in the frequency range of interest and, for comparison purposes, a military standard vibration schedule for highway truck vertical vibration exposure, often used for commercial product testing (MIL-STD-810H, Method 514.8C-I [28]). The peak visible at 50 Hz in both spectra is noise at the power line frequency, amplified by the accelerometer amplifier, and has to be disregarded from the acceleration spectrum. Although a strong mechanical resonance of the setup is excited near 150 Hz for vibrations up to 500 Hz (black curve), the measured signal noise level only increases marginally from 30μV to 40μV. During application of the low-frequency vibration spectrum with components up to 100 Hz (yellow curve), no changes in the measured noise level were observed and the noise remained at the background level.
Achieved peak accelerations for sinusoidal vibrations are plotted in Figure 8b together with the measured noise. It can be seen that, for frequencies between 20 Hz and 300 Hz, the PTI sensor was exposed to accelerations at or above0.5g up to1.7g, with the noise level still well within the3σnoise band. At 10 Hz, the large motion amplitude of the electrodynamic shaker was causing a repeated mechanical impulse to the PTI setup, and applied peak accelerations were reduced to prevent impulse excitation.
3.4. Response Time
As short response times are critical for a wide variety of applications, the response of the proposed PTI sensor to steps in concentration was investigated. Repeated steps from synthetic air (zero concentration) to concentrations of19.2ppm NO2 at0.5slpm and 1 s integration time revealed reproducible response times to 90% signal level (τ90) below 3 s; and recovery times to 10% signal level (τ10 ) below 2 s. An exemplary response curve is shown in Figure 9.
4. Discussion and Conclusions
The presented sensor concept, using a compact fiber-coupled Fabry–Pérot interferometer for photothermal spectroscopy, offers a reliable sensing scheme for NO2 with high spectral selectivity and sensitivity. The NNEA was determined to be7.5×10−8cm−1W/Hz , which is lower than previous PTI implementations [15,16], but can still be improved in future realizations, e.g., by applying a balanced detection scheme [17].
QEPAS implementations reach slightly better NNEAs (e.g.,2.5×10−8cm−1W/Hz [10],4.2×10−9cm−1W/Hz [13]) and, compared to conventional PAS implementations, the NNEA is up to a factor 100 worse (7.0×10−10cm−1W/Hz [10]). However, the proposed PTI sensor approach offers the possibility for a much smaller detection volume, capable of faster response times and higher miniaturization potential.
The developed, non-optimized cell has a volume smaller than 9 cm3, for which an integration time of 1scombined with a flow rate of0.5slpm proved to provide a good balance of response time and detection limit. Even though the given cell geometry comprises poorly flushed dead volumes, a response time ofτ90=3sand a recovery time ofτ10=2swere achieved. For applications requiring faster response times, a combination of smaller integration time and higher flow rate can be easily realized. Due to the small size of the optical microphone, the cell volume could be ultimately decreased to the dimensions of the FPI cavity, which is1.5mm×1.5mm×3.3mm≈7.5mm3, without major drawbacks. This is highly advantageous when compared to microstructured hollow-core fiber-based PTI approaches, where long fibers are needed to reach comparable NNEAs. To fully demonstrate the miniaturization potential of the presented method, future research should focus on the downscaling of the cell down to the FPI cavity volume.
On the other hand, applications like environmental monitoring require lower detection limits, at averaging times of up to one hour [5]. In this case, a stabilized laser source could be used, which would enable longer averaging times to improve the detection limit. Additionally, higher laser power could be used to improve the detection limit, as the photothermal signal scales directly with the laser power.
A low sensitivity of the PTI sensor to mechanical vibrations was demonstrated with broadband vibrations in a frequency range similar to vehicular vibration profiles. Although the applied vibration power was below the specified root mean square acceleration ofgrms=1.04gin the cited military vibration test standard, future commercial application possibilities in mobile gas sensing should be realizable with minor improvements in setup stability. This is underlined by the fact that, for sinusoidal vibrations, peak accelerations of1.7g could be applied to the described setup, without significantly increasing signal noise.
Although an expensive lab grade optical microphone was used for the proof of principle experiments, chip-level miniaturization of the sensor is possible, offering interesting potential for large-scale production of the sensor. Possible fields of application include exhaust gas and emission measurements. Furthermore, measurement of different gases can easily be achieved by using excitation lasers of different wavelengths.
[Image omitted. See PDF.]
[Image omitted. See PDF.]
[Image omitted. See PDF.]
[Image omitted. See PDF.]
[Image omitted. See PDF.]
[Image omitted. See PDF.]
[Image omitted. See PDF.]
[Image omitted. See PDF.]; red dotted line). (b) Measured signal noise (black circles) at the applied sinusoidal vertical peak accelerations (blue triangles) for zero air. Horizontal dotted lines mark1σand3σnoise levels."]
[Image omitted. See PDF.]
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.B. and B.L.; methodology, P.B. and B.L.; software, P.B.; validation, P.B., B.L., and A.B.; formal analysis, P.B. and B.L.; investigation, P.B. and B.L.; resources, P.B., B.L., and A.B.; data curation, P.B. and B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, P.B.; writing—review and editing, P.B., B.L., and A.B.; visualization, P.B. and B.L.; supervision, A.B.; project administration, A.B.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Wolfgang Rohringer and Balthasar Fischer from XARION Laser Acoustics GmbH for the constructive discussions. Open access publication is supported by the TU Graz Open Access Publishing Fund.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
PTI photothermal interferometry
PAS photoacoustic spectroscopy
QEPAS quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy
ksps kilosamples per second
NNEA noise normalized equivalent absorption
Appendix A. Drift of the Laser Power
To investigate whether drift is dominated by fluctuations of the laser power, an Allan deviation analysis was carried out. As can be seen in Figure A1, a drift of the laserpower is appearing at the same timescale as the drift of the FPI sensor (around 200s), which indicates that drift is caused by fluctuations of the laser power.
Figure A1.Allan deviation of the laser power as a function of the averaging time.
Figure A1.Allan deviation of the laser power as a function of the averaging time.
1. World Health Organisation. Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide—Global Update 2005; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
2. Wild, R.J.; Dubé, W.P.; Aikin, K.C.; Eilerman, S.J.; Neuman, J.A.; Peischl, J.; Ryerson, T.B.; Brown, S.S. On-road measurements of vehicle NO2/NOx emission ratios in Denver, Colorado, USA. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 148, 182–189.
3. Hagemann, R.; Corsmeier, U.; Kottmeier, C.; Rinke, R.; Wieser, A.; Vogel, B. Spatial variability of particle number concentrations and NOx in the Karlsruhe (Germany) area obtained with the mobile laboratory ‘AERO-TRAM’. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 94, 341–352.
4. Mead, M.I.; Popoola, O.A.M.; Stewart, G.B.; Landshoff, P.; Calleja, M.; Hayes, M.; Baldovi, J.J.; McLeod, M.W.; Hodgson, T.F.; Dicks, J.; et al. The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 70, 186–203.
5. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Off. J. Eur. Union 2008, L 152, 1–44.
6. Castell, N.; Dauge, F.R.; Schneider, P.; Vogt, M.; Lerner, U.; Fishbain, B.; Broday, D.; Bartonova, A. Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? Environ. Int. 2017, 99, 293–302.
7. Miklós, A.; Hess, P.; Bozóki, Z. Application of acoustic resonators in photoacoustic trace gas analysis and metrology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2001, 72, 1937–1955.
8. Kalkman, J.; van Kesteren, H. Relaxation effects and high sensitivity photoacoustic detection of NO2 with a blue laser diode. Appl. Phys. B 2008, 90, 197–200.
9. Yin, X.; Dong, L.; Wu, H.; Zheng, H.; Ma, W.; Zhang, L.; Yin, W.; Jia, S.; Tittel, F.K. Sub-ppb nitrogen dioxide detection with a large linear dynamic range by use of a differential photoacoustic cell and a 3.5 W blue multimode diode laser. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 247, 329–335.
10. Rück, T.; Bierl, R.; Matysik, F.M. Low-cost photoacoustic NO2 trace gas monitoring at the pptV-level. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2017, 263, 501–509.
11. Kosterev, A.A.; Bakhirkin, Y.A.; Curl, R.F.; Tittel, F.K. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. 2002, 27, 1902–1904.
12. Yi, H.; Liu, K.; Chen, W.; Tan, T.; Wang, L.; Gao, X. Application of a broadband blue laser diode to trace NO2 detection using off-beam quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 481–483.
13. Zheng, H.; Dong, L.; Yin, X.; Liu, X.; Wu, H.; Zhang, L.; Ma, W.; Yin, W.; Jia, S. Ppb-level QEPAS NO2 sensor by use of electrical modulation cancellation method with a high power blue LED. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 208, 173–179.
14. Rück, T.; Bierl, R.; Matysik, F.M. NO2 trace gas monitoring in air using off-beam quartz enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS) and interference studies towards CO2, H2O and acoustic noise. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 2462–2471.
15. Campillo, A.J.; Petuchowski, S.J.; Davis, C.C.; Lin, H.B. Fabry-perot photothermal trace detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1982, 41, 327–329.
16. Waclawek, J.P.; Bauer, V.C.; Moser, H.; Lendl, B. 2f-wavelength modulation Fabry-Perot photothermal interferometry. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 28958–28967.
17. Waclawek, J.P.; Kristament, C.; Moser, H.; Lendl, B. Balanced-detection interferometric cavity-assisted photothermal spectroscopy. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 12183–12195.
18. Yang, F.; Jin, W.; Lin, Y.; Wang, C.; Lut, H.; Tan, Y. Hollow-core microstructured optical fiber gas sensors. J. Lightwave Technol. 2016, 35, 3413–3424.
19. Krzempek, K. A Review of Photothermal Detection Techniques for Gas Sensing Applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2826.
20. Wynne, R.M.; Barabadi, B.; Creedon, K.J.; Ortega, A. Sub-Minute Response Time of a Hollow-Core Photonic Bandgap Fiber Gas Sensor. J. Lightwave Technol. 2009, 27, 1590–1596.
21. Hoo, Y.L.; Liu, S.; Ho, H.L.; Jin, W. Fast response microstructured optical fiber methane sensor with multiple side-openings. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2010, 22, 296–298.
22. Davis, C.C.; Petuchowski, S.J. Phase fluctuation optical heterodyne spectroscopy of gases. Appl. Opt. 1981, 20, 2539–2554.
23. Hecht, E. Optics, Global Edition, 5th ed.; Pearson: London, UK, 2017.
24. Preisser, S.; Rohringer, W.; Liu, M.; Kollmann, C.; Zotter, S.; Fischer, B.; Drexler, W. All-optical highly sensitive akinetic sensor for ultrasound detection and photoacoustic imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 2016, 7, 4171–4186.
25. Fischer, B.; Wintner, E. Sound Recording by Laser Interferometry. In Proceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics/International Quantum Electronics Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA, 31 May–5 June 2009; OSA: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; p. JWA64.
26. Roehl, C.M.; Orlando, J.J.; Tyndall, G.S.; Shetter, R.E.; Vazquez, G.J.; Cantrell, C.A.; Calvert, J.G. Temperature Dependence of the Quantum Yields for the Photolysis of NO2 Near the Dissociation Limit. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 7837–7843.
27. Breitegger, P.; Bergmann, A. A Precise Gas Dilutor Based on Binary Weighted Critical Flows to Create NO2 Concentrations. Proceedings 2018, 2, 998.
28. Mil-STD-810H: Department of Defense Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests; US Department of Defense (DoD): Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
29. Herault, J.; Pétrélis, F.; Fauve, S. 1/fα Low Frequency Fluctuations in Turbulent Flows. J. Stat. Phys. 2015, 161, 1379–1389.
30. Vandaele, A.; Hermans, C.; Simon, P.; Carleer, M.; Colin, R.; Fally, S.; Mérienne, M.; Jenouvrier, A.; Coquart, B. Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-section from 42,000 cm−1 to 10,000 cm−1 (238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 1998, 59, 171–184.
Institute of Electronic Sensor Systems, Graz University of Technology, Graz 8010, Austria
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Sensors for the reliable measurement of nitrogen dioxide concentrations are of high interest due the adverse health effects of this pollutant. This work employs photothermal spectroscopy to measure nitrogen dioxide concentrations at the parts per billion level. Absorption induced temperature changes are detected by means of a fiber-coupled Fabry–Pérot interferometer. The small size of the interferometer enables small detection volumes, paving the way for miniaturized sensing concepts as well as fast response times, demonstrated down to 3 s. A normalized noise equivalent absorption of7.5×10−8cm−1W/Hzis achieved. Additionally, due to the rigid structure of the interferometer, the sensitivity to mechanical vibrations is shown to be minor.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer




