It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Over the last decade, an increasing number of studies have used lake sediment DNA to trace past landscape changes, agricultural activities or human presence. However, the processes responsible for lake sediment formation and sediment properties might affect DNA records via taphonomic and analytical processes. It is crucial to understand these processes to ensure reliable interpretations for “palaeo” studies. Here, we combined plant and mammal DNA metabarcoding analyses with sedimentological and geochemical analyses from three lake-catchment systems that are characterised by different erosion dynamics. The new insights derived from this approach elucidate and assess issues relating to DNA sources and transfer processes. The sources of eroded materials strongly affect the “catchment-DNA” concentration in the sediments. For instance, erosion of upper organic and organo-mineral soil horizons provides a higher amount of plant DNA in lake sediments than deep horizons, bare soils or glacial flours. Moreover, high erosion rates, along with a well-developed hydrographic network, are proposed as factors positively affecting the representation of the catchment flora. The development of open and agricultural landscapes, which favour the erosion, could thus bias the reconstructed landscape trajectory but help the record of these human activities. Regarding domestic animals, pastoral practices and animal behaviour might affect their DNA record because they control the type of source of DNA (“point” vs. “diffuse”).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 BioArch-Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK; EDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, Le Bourget du Lac, France
2 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Grenoble, France; Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
3 BioArch-Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK
4 EDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, Le Bourget du Lac, France
5 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Grenoble, France
6 CEREGE, UMR CNRS 7330, IRD 161-Marseille Université, Technopôle de l’Arbois Méditerranée, BP 80, Aix en Provence cedex 4, France
7 Aix-Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France; Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES), Tarragona, Spain; Àrea de Prehistòria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
8 Aix-Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France