It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Advances in phenology (the annual timing of species’ life-cycles) in response to climate change are generally viewed as bioindicators of climate change, but have not been considered as predictors of range expansions. Here, we show that phenology advances combine with the number of reproductive cycles per year (voltinism) to shape abundance and distribution trends in 130 species of British Lepidoptera, in response to ~0.5 °C spring-temperature warming between 1995 and 2014. Early adult emergence in warm years resulted in increased within- and between-year population growth for species with multiple reproductive cycles per year (n = 39 multivoltine species). By contrast, early emergence had neutral or negative consequences for species with a single annual reproductive cycle (n = 91 univoltine species), depending on habitat specialisation. We conclude that phenology advances facilitate polewards range expansions in species exhibiting plasticity for both phenology and voltinism, but may inhibit expansion by less flexible species.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Thomas, Chris D 1
; Roy, David B 2
; Beaumont, Mark A 3 ; Bell, James R 4 ; Brereton, Tom 5 ; Bridle, Jon R 3 ; Dytham, Calvin 1
; Fox, Richard 5
; Gotthard, Karl 6
; Hoffmann, Ary A 7 ; Martin, Geoff 8 ; Middlebrook, Ian 5 ; Nylin, Sӧren 6 ; Platts, Philip J 9
; Rasteiro, Rita 3
; Saccheri, Ilik J 10 ; Villoutreix, Romain 10 ; Wheat, Christopher W 6 ; Hill, Jane K 1
1 Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK
2 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK
3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
4 Rothamsted Insect Survey, Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK
5 Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, UK
6 Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
7 Department of Zoology and Genetics, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
8 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
9 Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK
10 Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK




