Permanent education for good practices in the prevention of pressure injury: aImost-experiment

Abstract

Objective: To verify the effectiveness of the educational intervention through the evaluation of nurses' knowledge about prevention of pressure injury. Method: A quasiexperimental study with a single group, carried out with 95 nurses from a teaching hospital in the interior of Minas Gerais, in August and September 2017. As a teaching strategy, the active methodology and hybrid teaching were used, based on the reference of the Method of the Arch of Charles Maguerez. Data were collected from a validated instrument, called the Pieper Knowledge Test, and analyzed by descriptive statistics and Student's t-test with significance level of p <0.001. Results: The mean number of correct answers obtained by the nurses was 78.8% in the pre-test and 88.8% in the post-test, and the difference was statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: The educational intervention developed was effective, since it contributed to the improvement of nurses' knowledge.

Headnote

ABSTRACT

Objective: To verify the effectiveness of the educational intervention through the evaluation of nurses' knowledge about prevention of pressure injury. Method: A quasiexperimental study with a single group, carried out with 95 nurses from a teaching hospital in the interior of Minas Gerais, in August and September 2017. As a teaching strategy, the active methodology and hybrid teaching were used, based on the reference of the Method of the Arch of Charles Maguerez. Data were collected from a validated instrument, called the Pieper Knowledge Test, and analyzed by descriptive statistics and Student's t-test with significance level of p <0.001. Results: The mean number of correct answers obtained by the nurses was 78.8% in the pre-test and 88.8% in the post-test, and the difference was statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: The educational intervention developed was effective, since it contributed to the improvement of nurses' knowledge.

Descriptors: Pressure Ulcer; Nursing; Patient Safety; Continuing Education; Secondary Prevention.

RESUMO

Objetivo: Verificar a efetividade da intervençâo educativa por meio da avaliaçâo do conhecimento dos enfermeiros sobre prevençâo de lesâo por pressâo. Método: Estudo quase-experimental com um único grupo, realizado com 95 enfermeiros de um hospital de ensino do interior de Minas Gerais, nos meses de agosto e setembro de 2017. Como estrategia de ensino, utilizou-se a metodologia ativa e o ensino híbrido, baseado no referencial do Método do Arco de Charles Maguerez. Os dados foram coletados a partir de um instrumento validado, denominado Teste de Conhecimento de Pieper, e analisados por estatística descritiva e teste t de Student com nivel de significancia de p <0,001. Resultados: A média de acertos obtida pelos enfermeiros foi de 78,8% no pré-teste e 88,8% no pósteste, sendo a diferença estatisticamente significativa (p < 0,001). Conclusäo: A intervençâo educativa desenvolvida foi efetiva, uma vez que contribuiu para o aprimoramento do conhecimento dos enfermeiros.

Descritores: Lesâo por Pressâo; Enfermagem; Segurança do Paciente; Educaçâo Continuada; Prevençâo de Doenças.

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Verificar la efectividad de la intervención educativa por medio de la evaluación del conocimiento de los enfermeros sobre prevención de lesión por presión. Método: Estudio cuasi-experimental con un solo grupo, realizado con 95 enfermeros de un hospital de enseñanza del interior de Minas Gerais, en los meses de agosto y septiembre de 2017. Como estrategia de enseñanza, se utilizó la metodología activa y la enseñanza híbrida , basado en el referencial del Método del Arco de Charles Maguerez. Los datos fueron recolectados a partir de un instrumento validado, denominado Test de Conocimiento de Pieper, y analizados por estadística descriptiva y test t de Student con nivel de significancia de p <0,001. Resultados: La media de aciertos obtenidos por los enfermeros fue de 78,8% en el pre-test y 88,8% en el post-test, siendo la diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p <0,001). Conclusión: La intervención educativa desarrollada fue efectiva, ya que contribuyó para el perfeccionamiento del conocimiento de los enfermeros.

Descriptores: Úlcera por Presión; Enfermería; Seguridad del Paciente; Educación Continua; Prevención de Enfermedades.

INTRODUCTION

Pressure ulcers (PU) are one of the main adverse events found in health services, being one of the most common consequences of long stay in hospitals(1). According to the American National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)(2), the PU is a damage in the skin and/or underlying tissues, usually over a bony prominence, resulting from isolated or combined pressure with shear forces and/or friction, as well as from microclimate, nutrition, perfusion and tissue conditions. Its occurrence is associated not only with care failures, but also with the factors inherent in the individual cared for, which increases the risks of developing the injury®.

A study(4) carried out in a university hospital with 77 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) pointed that the incidence of PU was 22%. Other studies(5-6) showed incidence of PU ranging from 25.8% to 50%. The high incidence is directly related to the patients' high risk of developing the PU, according to the Braden scale(7), and the first week of hospitalization is the period in which most of the injuries arise(8).

Considered a persistent health problem, the PU causes patients and their families to suffer, generates cost and increases the workload of the nursing teams that play a central role in care(3). In this regard, adopting preventive measures to reduce its occurrence is important, since it is considered a key indicator of care quality®. Among the nursing care actions for prevention of PU, one highlights the importance of decubitus change, whose benefit is to decompress areas over bony prominences®.

It is essential that nurses seek constant improvement in its practices to implement measures aimed at identifying risk factors of PU, so that the integrity of the patient's skin during the period of hospitalization can be maintained and thus a good quality care can be provided™.

In this context, the continuing education aimed at the nursing staff is an important action in health services, because it allows updating the professionals' knowledge and improving care. Still, it assists in the transformation of reality through the articulation between the theory and practice appplied by workers, mediated by institutional policies that support these actions™.

Regarding the new pedagogical tendencies, active methodology is one of the possible strategies for training critical-reflective professionals, that is, co-responsible for the production of their own learning process, from the observation of social reality, understanding of the problem through scientific-theoretical basis and raising o9f hypothesis to solve the problems identified™.

In addition, digital technologies have provided changes in education, which can be observed with the creation of several modalities of distance learning, including hybrid teaching, combining classroom activities and distance educational activities, focused on values, skills and knowledge construction™.

Therefore, hybrid education is defined as the union of two models of learning: the classroom model, in which the process occurs in the classroom; and the online model, which uses digital technologies to promote education. One can consider that both of these learning environments become complementary, because the subject interacts with the group, intensifying the exchange of experiences that occurs in the classroom™.

Considering that, the question that guided this study was: How effective is the educational intervention on nurses' knowledge regarding the prevention of PU?

OBJETIVE

To verify the effectiveness of educational intervention by assessing nurses' knowledge on pressure ulcer preventive measures.

METHOD

Ethical aspects

This study is part of the project entitled "Continuing education as a strategy of training and management for quality and safety in nursing care'j approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of a university. The data collection tools were applied after signing of the informed consent form (ICF). Anonymity was guaranteed, since the participants were identified by a number.

Study design

It is a quasi-experimental study with a single group, conducted in a large teaching hospital, which offers high-complexity care, located in Minas Gerais.

Inclusion criteria

The population of this study consisted of nurses of the aforementioned institution, totaling 178 professionals. The inclusion criteria were: to work as an outreach nurse at a hospital and to be enrolled in the educational intervention. Nurses who were on leave or medical license/maternity leave were excluded from this study. The non-probabilistic sample was composed of 95 nurses, after losses: professionals who were enrolled but did not attend the educational intervention; and professionals who did not attend all stages of the educational intervention. Figure 1 shows the sample loss.

These professionals were recruited from the inscription for participation in the course on prevention of PU, offered by the service of education in nursing (SEE) of the institution, according to goal of the Strategic Director Plan (PDE) for the biennium 2017-2018.

Study protocol

The educational intervention, performed in August and September 2017, was guided by the problematization method, based on the Method of the Arch by Charles Maguerez, consisting of five steps: observation of reality, key points, theorizing, hypotheses of solution and application to reality(12). Figure 2 shows the steps of the educational intervention adopted, based on the Arch of Maguerez:

Paulo Freire advocates the problematizing education(14), based on the inseparability of the contexts and the life stories in the training of subjects, arguing that the learner's previous knowledge must be respected and exploited. In addition, the author reveals that teaching is not the transference of knowledge, but the creation of possibilities for its own production or development; for this purpose, the stimulus to curiosity and active stance are the tools used, encouraging the critical analysis of reality.

Hybrid education was a teaching strategy used in the course, in which the nurses had three face-to-face moments (one meeting per week) combined with interactivity in the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) of the university: Moodle. Being a VLE, Moodle is an online education administration system of educational activities aimed at promoting interactivity and learning(15).

The VLE was used throughout the course based on the theme discussed in person, containing classes, videos, materials of the Ministry of Health and scientific articles, forum for group discussion and activities, such as a basis of photos of PU for identification of stages according to the characteristics of the injuries®. All of this sought to involve the participants in active participation, interactivity and solving of daily life problems.

The face-to-face moments included dialogue expository classes and teaching-learning tools based on active methodology. In the first face-to-face meeting, the contents addressed in class included the theme "Pathophysiology and classification of the PU". The tool used by the facilitators was the "situation-problem" which aimed to identify the problems that contribute to a higher incidence of PU in the institution. Then, the participants had seven days for virtual interactivity in the Moodle before the second face-to-face meeting.

In the second face-to-face meeting, the theme was "Welfare quality indicator: monitoring of PU" The tool used was "team-based learning", which assisted in understanding multidimensional problems related to the incidence of PU and the importance of monitoring them. At the end of the meeting, the nurses were encouraged to carry on the activities, by accessing the VLE, for more seven days. The theme of the third and last face-to-face meeting was "Nursing process in the prevention of PU". A "workshop" that considered the structure of the nursing process was done for development of skills to identify the risk of PU and to prescribe precautions. Finally, one more virtual meeting completed the educational intervention. The total workload was 30 hours, being 12 hours in the classroom and 18 hours of distance teaching.

For data collection, two instruments were used: one consisting of sociodemographic data, elaborated by the authors (gender, age, job sector, higher degree of training in the field) and the Pieper Knowledge Test, to assess the participants' level of knowledge of the prevention of PU, composed of 41 questions in form of statements to indicate true (T), false (F) or uncertain (U), validated and adapted to Brazil(16). The right answers are real statements answered as "V" or false ones answered as "F" Each right answer received one point, and no points were assigned to the wrong answers and to questions whose answers were U. The Pieper Knowledge Test, to which nurses answered individually, was administered before and after the educational intervention.

Analysis of results and statistics

The data collected were tabulated in a Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using the statistical software of the program Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 21.0. Descriptive statistics was used to design measures of central tendency, frequencies and dispersion for demographic variables. The Student's t-fesf was used to compare the averages of right answers before and after the educational intervention. The significance level set was p < 0.001.

RESULTS

Ninety-five nurses of the hospital participated in the study, with an average age of 33.47 years, ranging from 23 to 70 years old. Regarding higher degree of training in the field, 12.6% of nurses have only undergraduate course, 73.7% of them have a specialization course; 12.6%, master's degree; and 1.1%, doctorate degree. When considering the average of right answers before the intervention and the professional's training, those having only graduation reached an average of 76.6% right answers; those with specialization, and average of 79.7% right answers; masters, an average of 76.1%; and doctors, an average of 73.2%. Regarding the average of right answers after the intervention, in the above order, 91.9% were graduated; 88.5% were specialists; 87.3%, masters; and 82.9%, doctors.

With regard to another job, only 11.6% of the nurses have more than one job. In relation to the average of right answers, the nurses who have another job reached a score of 81% in the pre-intervention test and, after the training, it increased to 89.7%. The average of right answers of those who have only one job was 78.5% before the intervention, increasing to 88.8% in the final phase of the intervention.

When assessing the nurses' score in the pretest, a variation from 60.9% to 90.2% of right answers (average of 78.8%) was observed, and, in the posttest, the score ranged from 68.3% to 100% (average of 88.8%), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Table 1 shows the results obtained by the nurses by doing the knowledge test before and after the educational intervention.

The nurses answered 100% of questions correctly in the preintervention questionnaire in items 25, 27, 30, 40 and 41, which, in general, address the need for orienting patients and their families about the prevention, causes and risk factors of PU, as well as the reduction in the incidence of PU through educational programs in the institution.

Items 5, 13 and 14 of the pre-intervention test had the lowest percentage of right answers (49.5%, 23.1% and 10.5%, respectively), related to massage of areas with hyperemia, use of water-filled or air-filled gloves and of donut cushions to prevent PU. After the training, improvement in those items was observed, since they show a percentage of right answers of 95.8% 89.5%, and 74.7%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Since the incidence of PU in hospitalized patients impacts the quality of the care provided, the adoption of good practices through the improvement in the prevention of PU is necessary. Knowledge is essential to behavior change.

The results of this study indicate that the nurses had previous knowledge of the prevention of PU, considering the average of right answers they scored in the pretest (78.8%), despite some weaknesses found.

A similar1171 study with 40 nursing professionals of an ICU at a university hospital in Manaus identified an average of 51.4% of right answers for nurses in the categories of the Pieper Knowledge Test; thus, verifying knowledge deficit about prevention of Pu, which makes the training of these professionals fundamental.

A study™ conducted in Sweden with 415 participants, among which were nurses and nursing students, suggests the need for an educational program focused on the nursing staff due to the deficiency of knowledge of these professionals about the prevention of PU.

Such weaknesses in the nurses' knowledge impact directly the patient's safety, since it favors the occurrence of undesirable effects of health care, affecting the service quality. Given the scale of the problem, aimed at reducing adverse events and achieving a safe care, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the World Alliance for Patient Safety, encouraging the adoption of the International Patient Safety Goals, among them the prevention of PUs(3).

The nurses answered correctly 100% of the questions of the items describing the importance of orientation about PU and reduction in its incidence through educational programs, namely, the professionals perceive the need for prevention. However, the occurrence of this adverse event is still considered a problem in hospitals, which suggests the prevention methods are not as effective as thought or are not being used properly·191.

The data presented showed the questions the nurses failed to answer more frequently were related to the nursing care that are currently contraindicated in the prevention of PU, such as: massage of areas with hyperemia, use of water-filled or air-filled gloves and of donut cushions to prevent PU. This datum corroborates studies that, when assessing the nurses' knowledge, identified lower percentage of right answers to the same items, demonstrating the importance of updating and in-service training00-211.

The use of hybrid teaching and active methodology as a focus of educational intervention for improvement in nurses regarding the prevention of PU showed satisfactory results, since there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) when considering the average of right answers before and after the intervention (from 78.8% to 88.8%).

Problem-based learning contributes to the applicability of the concepts learned, since it begins with the presentation of a problem and involves discussion and research in group(22). Active methodologies with digital technologies enable better learning through practices, activities, games, problems when compared with the conventional method™, in addition to allowing flexibility for the conduction of the activities, once they help in overcoming the barrier of time and space™.

Still, they provide quick access to a large piece of information by modifying the ways of thinking and developing knowledge; therefore, their role should be considered concerning modifications they cause in the ways of thinking and in behavioral changes of those who use them or are surrounded by them™.

In Brazil, one believes that hybrid teaching is the modality capable of introducing changes in classroom teaching and in distance courses, considering that they favor the students' learning in all aspects041.

The use of outdated techniques for prevention unveils the need for update and affects the nurse's competence profile, since the lack of knowledge reflects in the skills and attitudes of professionals when caring for patients at risk of PU.

In relation to the prevention of PU, knowledge is not enough, we need to improve skills and attitudes, which comprises the three main matrices of competence - knowing, knowing how to do, and wanting to do(25). The knowledge of the prevention of PU is considered a basic content in the nurses' training, and the everyday practice of the competence is the tool for a safe and good quality care(26).

The Pieper Knowledge Test, used in this study, allowed assessing the nurses' cognitive skills regarding the prevention of PU, whereas the attitudinal competencies were addressed in the educational intervention adopted in the course, through the active methodology and hybrid education.

Study limitations walk

This study showed limitations related to the quasi-experimental design with a single group, since it had neither control group nor randomization.

Contributions to the fields of nursing, health or public policy

In regard to the contributions, it enabled the identification of the main knowledge deficits of the nurses on the prevention of PU, besides verifying the effectiveness of the active methodology and hybrid education as tools for continuing education.

In addition, an institutional protocol for the prevention of PU was designed and a report of the study on the main problems contributing to the incidence of PU identified by the nurses who participated in the course was sent to the management of the hospital, as well as the hypotheses of solutions proposed by these professionals to standardize actions and improve the quality of the nursing care provided in the institution. The results found in this study point to the need for investment in the training of professionals through the education services of hospitals.

CONCLUSION

One highlights that the nurses had knowledge on the prevention of PU before the intervention, considering the average of right answers in the pretest (78.8%). However, this study pointed some weaknesses in the knowledge, considering that these professionals still use old-fashioned prevention techniques, which points the need for updating and in-service training.

The educational intervention adopted showed satisfactory results, since no statistically significant difference was found (p < 0.001) when considering the average of right answers before and after the intervention (from 78.8% to 88.8%), which shows the action is effective, once it contributed to improving the nurses' knowledge.

One suggests that new studies adopt the educational strategy presented here and evaluate knowledge acquisition for educational planning. In addition, encouraging the nurses' attitudinal and psychomotor skills in relation to the prevention of PU is necessary, on behalf of patient safety.

Sidebar

How to cite this article:

Campoi ALM, Engel RH, Stacciarini TSG, Cordeiro ALPC, Melo AF, Rezende MP. Permanent education for good practices in the prevention of pressure injury: almost-experiment. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(6):1646-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0778

Corresponding Author:

Ana Laura Mendes Campoi

E-mail: [email protected]

Submission: 10-09-2018 Approval: 03-10-2019

References

REFERENCES

1. Pereira MO, Ludvich SC, Omizzolo JAE. Segurança do paciente: Prevençâo de úlcera por pressâo em unidade de terapia intensiva. Rev Inova Saúde. 2016;5(2):29-44. doi: 10.18616/is.v5i2.3009

2. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP). National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) announces a change in terminology from pressure ulcer to pressure injury and updates the stages of pressure injury [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 May 26]. Available from: http://www. npuap.org/national-pressure-ulcer-advisory-panel-npuap-announces-a-change-in-terminology-from-pressure-ulcer-to-pressure-injuryand-updates-the-stages-of-pressure-injury/

3. Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (ANVISA). Assistencia Segura: Uma Reflexâo Teórica Aplicada a Prática [Internet]. Brasilia; 2013 [cited 2017 Dec 18]. Available from: http://www.saude.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/0SEGURANCA_DO_PACIENTE/Modulo_1AssistenciaSegura.pdf.

4. Borghardt AT, Prado TN, Bicudo SDS, Castro DS, Bringuente MEO. Pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: incidence and associated factors. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69(3):431-8. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167.2016690307i

5. Louro M, Ferreira M, Póvoa P. Avaliaçâo de protocolo de prevençâo e tratamento de úlceras de pressâo. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(3):337-41. doi: 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000300012

6. Fernandes NCS, Torres GV. Incidencia e fatores de risco de úlceras de pressâo em pacientes de unidade de terapia intensiva. Cienc Cuid Saúde. 2008;7(3):304-10. doi: 10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v7i3.6484

7. Paranhos WY, Santos VLCG. Avaliaçâo de risco para úlceras por pressâo por meio da Escala de Braden, na lingua portuguesa. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2018 Jul 09];33(n.esp.):191-206. Available from: http://www.ee.usp.br/reeusp/upload/pdf/799.pdf

8. Matos LS, Duarte NLV, Minetto RC. Incidencia e prevalencia de úlcera por pressâo no CTI de um Hospital Público do DF. Rev Eletr Enf. 2010;12(4):719-26. doi: 10.5216/ree.v12i4.8481

9. Santos CT, Oliveira MC, Pereira AGS, Suzuki LM, Lucena AF. Pressure ulcer care quality indicator: analysis of medical records and incident report. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2013;34(1):111-8. doi: 10.1590/S1983-14472013000100014

10. Lima PR, Damacena DEL, Neves VLS, Campos RBN, Silva FAA, Bezerra SMG. Ocorrencia de lesâo por pressâo em pacientes hospitalizados: uma revisâo integrativa. Rev Uningá Review [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Mar 8];32(1):53-67. Available from: http://revista.uninga.br/index. php/uningareviews/article/view/39/446

11. Cavalcante EFO, Macedo MLAF, Oliveira JSA, Martini JG, Backes VMS. Practice of continuous educations for nursing in health services. Rev Enferm UFPE. 2013;7(2):598-607. doi: 10.5205/reuol.3073-24791-1-LE.0702201335

12. Prado ML, Velho MB, Espindola DS, Sobrinho SH, Backes VMS. Arco de Charles Maguerez: refletindo estrategias de metodologia ativa na formaçâo de profissionais de saúde. Esc Anna Nery. 2012;16(1):172-7. doi: 10.1590/S1414-81452012000100023

13. Bacich L, Tanzi Neto A, Trevisani FM. Ensino hibrido: personalizaçâo e tecnología na educaçâo. Porto Alegre: Penso; 2015.

14. Freire P. Pedagogia da Autonomia: saberes necessários a prática educativa. 25a ed. Sao Paulo: Paz e Terra; 1996.

15. Rostas MHSG, Rostas GR. O Ambiente Virtual de Aprendizagem (MOODLE) como ferramenta auxiliar no processo de ensino aprendizagem: uma questao de comunicaçao. In: Soto U, Mayrink MF, Gregolin IV, organizadoras. Linguagem, Educaçao e Virtualidade: experiencias e reflexöes. Sao Paulo: Cultura Academica; 2009. p. 135-151.

16. Fernandes LM, Caliri MHL, Haas VJ. Efeito de intervençöes educativas no conhecimento dos profissionais de enfermagem sobre prevençao de úlceras pressao. Acta Paul Enferm. 2008;21(2):305-11. doi: 10.1590/S0103-21002008000200012

17. Galvao NS, Serique MAB, Santos VLCG, Nogueira PC. Knowledge of the nursing team on pressure ulcer prevention. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2017;70(2):294-300. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0063

18. Gunningberg L, Mårtensson G, Mamhidir AG, Florin J, Athlin ÅM, Bååth C. Pressure ulcer knowledge of registered nurses, assistant nurses and student nurses: a descriptive, comparative multicentre study in Sweden. Int Wound J. 2013;12(4):462-8. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12138

19. Wong AL, Walia GS, Bello R, Aquino CS, Sacks JM. Pressure ulcer prevalence and perceptions on prevention: a hospital-wide survey of health professionals. J Wound Care. 2018;27(Supl 4):S29-S35. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.Sup4.S29

20. Miyazaki MY, Caliri MHL, Santos CB. Conhecimento dos profissionais de enfermagem sobre prevençao da úlcera por pressao. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2010;18(6):1203-11. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692010000600022

21. Mauricio AB, Lemos DS, Crosewski NI, Roehrs H. Conhecimentos dos profissionais de enfermagem relacionados as úlceras por pressao. Rev Enferm UFSM. 2014;4(4):751-760. doi: 10.5902/2179769211707

22. Souza SC, Dourado L. Aprendizagem baseada em problemas (ABP): um método de aprendizagem inovador para o ensino educativo. Holos. 2015;31(5):182-200. doi: 10.15628/holos.2015.2880

23. Sousa RP Moita FMCSC, Carvalho ABG. Tecnologías digitais na educaçao [Internet]. Campina Grande: EDUEPB;2011 [cited 2018 Jul 09]. Available from: http://www.clam.org.br/bibliotecadigital/uploads/publicacoes/1484_991_sousa-9788578791247.pdf

24. Valente JA. Blended learning e as mudanças no ensino superior: a proposta da sala de aula invertida. Educ Rev. 2014;4(n.esp):79-97. doi: 10.1590/0104-4060.38645

25. Furukawa PO, Cunha ICKO. Da gestao por competencias as competencias gerenciais do enfermeiro. Rev Bras Enferm. 2010;63(6):1061-6. doi: 10.1590/S0034-71672010000600030

26. Moura ECC, Caliri MHL. Simulation for the development of clinical competence in risk assessment for pressure ulcer. Acta Paul Enferm. 2013;26(4):369-75. doi: 10.1590/S0103-21002013000400011