A Mechanical Model of Gas Drainage Borehole Clogging under Confining Pressure and Its Application

Abstract

In the context of environmental protection, a low concentration of methane, when emitted into the atmosphere, can increase the greenhouse effect; the results of analyses on global warming potential (GWP) suggest that the greenhouse effect of methane (CH4) is 25 times greater than that of carbon dioxide (CO2) [3,4]. [...]gas drainage and utilization in methane-rich coal seams has significance for, among other things, safety, energy saving and environmental protection. In 2015, the total CBM production was 18 billion cubic meters, of which the ground-well drainage production was only 4.4 billion cubic meters and the underground gas drainage volume was 13.6 billion cubic meters. [...]gas drainage in coal mines has become a combination of underground gas drainage and ground-well drainage [12]. According to the conditions of the drilling process, a mechanics model of the corresponding clogging segments in boreholes is established. The thickness of the coal seam varies from 0 to 18.88 m. Many drilling accidents have been recorded, such as drill pipe sticking, breaks in drill pipes and loss of drill pipes. Because of the frequent changes in the coal seam’s thickness, it is easy to bend a drill’s path into roof or floor rocks with an actual depth of only 30 to 50 m, which is far below the designed value. 5.2.

1. Introduction

Coal-bed gas (CBM) refers to the absorbed and the free methane gas in a coal bed. In coal mining, methane is a harmful gas and is responsible for most cases of mining disaster that involve gas [1]. As an energy resource, methane is a kind of clean energy and can be used in civilian or industrial gas applications [2]. In the context of environmental protection, a low concentration of methane, when emitted into the atmosphere, can increase the greenhouse effect; the results of analyses on global warming potential (GWP) suggest that the greenhouse effect of methane (CH₄) is 25 times greater than that of carbon dioxide (CO₂) [3,4]. Therefore, gas drainage and utilization in methane-rich coal seams has significance for, among other things, safety, energy saving and environmental protection. [5,6]. The tendency in coal mining has been to develop deeper underground, where coal seams have the “three high and two low” characteristic; namely, high geostress, high gas content, high gas pressure, low strength and low permeability [7,8]. The coal seam permeability is less than 0.1 md in many mining areas, which has led to long gas drainage cycles, low gas drainage efficiencies, high material losses and indirect delays in coal seam mining progress and has brought about great economic losses for the coal mining industry [9,10]. Protective coal seams mining and relief-pressure gas drainage are the main methods for controlling the occurrence of disasters that involve gas. For a single coal seam with a coal and gas outburst that does not have protective coal seams, the gas is pre-drained by drilling a borehole down and across the seam [5]. Ground-well drainage has been applied in a coal and gas outburst mine under complicated geological conditions and the investment cost was found to be high and the drainage effect not ideal [11]. In 2015, the total CBM production was 18 billion cubic meters, of which the ground-well drainage production was only 4.4 billion cubic meters and the underground gas drainage volume was 13.6 billion cubic meters. Therefore, gas drainage in coal mines has become a combination of underground gas drainage and ground-well drainage [12].

Boreholes are the premise of gas drainage in underground mines [13,14]. The quantity of material removed during a borehole’s construction is huge in coal seams with a coal outburst, and, in many regional boreholes’ construction, the quantity of material that was removed was more than 0.3 m/t (the length of the constructed borehole for every ton of coal mined). Coal seams with an outburst of coal give priority to class III crushed coal (Protodyakonov coefficient f = 0.25~0.5) and class IV mylonite coal (Protodyakonov coefficient f < 0.3) [15]. In the process of drilling a borehole, significant deformation in the borehole’s wall can occur and it can easily collapse to form a “drilling cave” [16,17] that is caused by the ground stress, gas pressure and tectonic stress. When, in the discharge of the drilling operation, there is a space shrinkage, the resistance to movement of the drill cuttings will increase and the cuttings can easily accumulate to form a clogging segment of a certain length. If the borehole’s internal fluid pressure reaches the system’s air pressure maximum and the clogging segment is not dredged, then the drilling operation will not be able to continue [18]. Due to the low strength of soft coal, a rheological phenomenon appears around the borehole in the process of drilling. Therefore, the confining pressure p_i is formed between the clogging segment and the borehole’s wall. Considering the confining pressure p_i in the analysis means that it will more closely reflect actual working conditions. In this paper, we analyze the mechanical characteristics of clogging segments in gas drainage boreholes under the confining pressure. Then, a mechanical model of clogging segments is used to evaluate and optimize a drilling field construction.

2. Objective of the Study

Through the observation of a borehole at a mine site using a borescope, the borehole is shown to have different features in different positions that indicate failure. As shown in Figure 1a, the borehole’s wall is intact and only a few irregular fissures can be observed. As shown in Figure 1b, a transition area with more damage can be observed along the direction of the red arrow, where the destroyed space extends deeply down the borehole’s wall. As shown in Figure 1c,d, the damage to borehole’s wall is serious and obvious spalling-holes can be observed.

For a drilling operation with an air power discharge, the deformation and destruction of the borehole lead to the shrinkage of the discharge space, resulting in an increase in the drill cuttings’ movement resistance and a pressure loss in the air system. The drill cuttings will accumulate as a result of factors such as shrinkage in the borehole’s wall, unstable air pressure and large blocks of coal. However, a clog will form if the abovementioned factors cannot be kept under control, as shown in Figure 2. The clogging segment L is formed by large particles of coal and rock. When the discharge power reaches the maximum pressure P_max of the air system, there is no way to dredge the clogging segment and the drilling operation will terminate. Therefore, the formation of clogging segments in boreholes is an important reason for why it is difficult to drill in soft coal seams. The objectives of this study include:

(1)

Establishing a clogging segment under confining pressure mechanics model that can be used to analyze the influence of a borehole’s parameters on a borehole clog.

(2)

Evaluating the improvement in a drilling scheme using the clogging segment mechanics model.

3. Clogging Segment Mechanics Model

As shown in Figure 3, once a clogging segment has formed in a borehole, the borehole’s wall will show an obvious rheological phenomenon under the geostress, tectonic stress and gas pressure. Then, the coal around borehole’s wall will continue to be deformed. When the deformation becomes evident, the borehole’s wall will squeeze the clogging segment. As a result, the additional force p_i will form in the interface between the clogging segment and the borehole’s wall.

As shown in Figure 3, once the clogging segment has formed, a frictional resistance appears around the clogging segment under a combination of the air pressure p and the confining pressure p_i, the properties of which are as follows:

(1)

The frictional resistance is formed by the coal cinder gravity of the clogging segment.

(2)

Lateral pressure is formed on the two contact surfaces of the clogging segment according to the air pressure p, which includes the lateral pressure p_c1 between the surface of the clogging segment and the drill pipe’s outside surface and the lateral pressure p_c2 between the surface of the clogging segment and that of the borehole’s wall.

(3)

The formation of frictional resistance also depends partly on the confining pressure p_i.

According to the conditions of the drilling process, a mechanics model of the corresponding clogging segments in boreholes is established. The borehole’s angle ranges from −π/2 to π/2, the upward borehole’s angle ranges from 0 to π/2, the horizontal borehole’s angle is equal to 0 and the downward borehole’s angle ranges from −π/2 to 0.

Figure 4 shows the mechanical model of a clogging segment in an upward borehole, according to the stress state of the clogging segment, where L is the clogging segment’s length, θ is the borehole’s angle, D is the borehole’s diameter and d is the drill pipe’s diameter. The air pressure in the clogging segment is denoted as p₁. The air pressure outside the clogging segment (atmospheric pressure) is denoted as p₂. The confining pressure around the borehole is denoted p_i. As the borehole deformation mechanism is very complex, some simplifications and assumptions are introduced, as follows:

(1)

The cross-section of boreholes is circular.

(2)

The medial axis of the drill pipe coincides with that of the borehole, regardless of the bending of the drill pipe in the borehole.

Once a clogging segment is formed, the lateral pressure p_c1 appears on the interface between the drill pipe and the clogging segment under the effect of the air pressure p₁ and the lateral pressure p_c2 is formed on the interface between the clogging segment and the borehole’s wall.

3.1 Stress Analysis of a Clogging Segment

(1) The frictional resistance caused by gravity

The frictional resistance caused by gravity has two main parts, as shown in Figure 4. One part is the gravity induced by the cuttings in the space between the blue dotted lines. The other part is the gravity induced by the cuttings other than those in the space mentioned. Setting an infinitesimal length for the drilling segment dL, F₁ is the total friction resistance caused by gravity. So, the equation for the frictional resistance F₁ caused by gravity can be expressed as:

_F1=_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)dL

where S_r is the cross-sectional area of coal cuttings around the drill pipe, S_d is the dotted line area above the drill pipe, L is the length of the clogging segment, ρ_b is the density of the accumulated coal in the clog, f₁ is the friction factor between the clogging segment and the surface of the drill pipe and f₂ is the friction factor between the clogging segment and borehole’s wall.

(2) The frictional resistance caused by lateral pressure

As shown in Figure 4, after a clogging segment is formed, the lateral pressure p_c1 and the lateral pressure p_c2 appear where the clogging segment interfaces with the drill pipe and the borehole’s wall under the effect of the axial air pressure p₁. So, the equation for the frictional resistance F₂ caused by lateral pressure can be expressed as:

_F2=(_f1d+_f2D)kpπdL

where p is the axial air pressure around the clogging segment in the borehole, k is the lateral pressure coefficient and D is the diameter of the borehole.

(3) The frictional resistance caused by the confining pressure p_i

As shown in Figure 4, the frictional resistance F₃ is formed by the confining pressure p_i on the interface between the drill pipe and the clogging segment. The equation for the frictional resistance F₃ caused by the confining pressure p_i can be expressed as:

_F3=(_f1d+_f2D)_piπdL

3.2. Equation for the Mechanics of a Clogging Segment

Based on Equations (1)–(3) and according to the stress analysis of the clogging segment, a load balance equation is established with a clogging segment as the research object:

_Srdp=_F1+_F2+_F3

where,

_Srdp=_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)dL+(_f1d+_f2D)kpπdL+(_f1d+_f2D)_piπdL

where,

dL=_Sr(_f1d+_f2D)kpπ+(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)dp

_∫0L1dL=_∫0LSr(_f1d+_f2D)kpπ+(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)dp

For the same construction site, once the drilling design scheme has been selected, the parameters D, d, ρ_b, f, θ, and k are seen as constants. Most of the time, the confining pressure p_i does not change much around a clogging segment in a borehole during its construction. At the same time, regardless of the increase in the confining pressure p_i that is caused by creeping coal, the boundary conditions will be such that p equals to p₂ when L is 0 and when the clogging segment length is L, p = p₁, namely:

L=_∫P2P1Sr(_f1d+_f2D)kpπ+(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)dp

L=_Sr(_f1d+_f2D)kπln(_f1d+_f2D)kπ_p1+(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)(_f1d+_f2D)kπ_p2+(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)

When a clogging segment is formed, the air pressure p₂ outside the clogging segment is the same as the atmospheric pressure. Taking the atmospheric pressure as the referential parameter (p₂ = 0), the air pressure p₁ inside the clogging segment is determined by the compressed air system for discharging drill cuttings. Therefore, Equation (9) can be expressed as:

L=_Sr(_f1d+_f2D)kπln(_f1d+_f2D)kπp+(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)

(_f1d+_f2D)kπp(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)=^{e(_f1d+_f2D)kπ_SrL}−1

Based on Equation (11), the borehole dredging pressure p can be expressed as:

p=[^{e(_f1d+_f2D)kπ_SrL}−1][(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)](_f1d+_f2D)kπ

3.3. The Critical Length of a Clogging Segment

Based on Equation (12), the corresponding dredging pressure p has a positive correlation with the length of the clogging segment, L. When the dredging pressure reaches its maximum, P_max, the critical length of the clogging segment, L₀, can be obtained. In other words, the clogging segment cannot be dredged once the value of L is larger than that of the clogging segment’s critical length L₀. Based on Equation (12), the critical length of a clogging segment, L₀, can be expressed as:

_L0=_Sr(_f1d+_f2D)kπln(_f1d+_f2D)kπ_Pmax+_f2D_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)(_f1d+_f2D)_piπ+_ρbg(_Sdcosθ_f1+(_Sr−_Sd)cosθ_f2−_Srsinθ)

4. The Influence of the Borehole’s Parameters on Borehole Clogging 4.1. The Method of Analysis and Basic Parameters

4.1.1. The Method of Analysis

Based on Equation (12), the equation that models a clogging segment involves important parameters in drilling construction, such as the borehole’s diameter D, the drill pipe’s diameter d, the accumulation density of drill cuttings ρ_b, the friction factor f₁ between the coal clogging segment and the drill pipe’s surface, the friction factor f₂ between the coal clogging segment and the borehole’s wall, the drilling construction angle θ and the lateral pressure coefficient k.

At the same time, the confining pressure p_i on the clogging segment induced by borehole shrinkage was also considered in the model. Therefore, based on Equation (12), the influence of the above parameters on borehole clogging can be analyzed. In this paper, our analysis is focused on the borehole’s angle θ and the confining pressure p_i.

4.1.2. Basic Parameters

(1) The accumulation density, ρ_b

The accumulation density of drill cuttings depends mainly on the kind of coal. For example, the accumulation density of anthracite varies from 700 to 1000 kg/m³, the accumulation density of bituminous coal varies from 800 to 1000 kg/m³, the accumulation density of lignite varies from 600 to 800 kg/m³ and the accumulation density of peat varies from 290 to 500 kg/m³. Considering the compaction effect of drill cuttings on coal, the accumulation density of coal will increase but it generally will not exceed the coal tamping density [19,20]. The coal tamping density is generally in the range of 900 to 1200 kg/m³. Therefore, the average coal accumulation density ρ_b ranges from 600 to 1100 kg/m³.

(2) The lateral pressure coefficient, k

The ratio of radial stress to axial pressure is known as the lateral pressure coefficient k. When a borehole is clogged, radial stress is generated from a combination of the axial air pressure and the gravity of the clogging segment. Ideally, the lateral pressure coefficient k would be determined using the internal friction angle of the drill cutting particles, also known as the active Rankine coefficient [21]. The formula for calculating the lateral pressure coefficient can be expressed as:

k=1−sinϕ1+sinϕ=t^g2(π4−ϕ2)

Based on experimental research, Xie Benming et al. [22] found the lateral pressure coefficient value that was calculated using the Rankine coefficient to be less than the actual value. They modified Equation (14) as follows:

k=1.1(1−sinϕ)

According to the coal’s type and granularity, the internal friction angle of coal commonly ranges from 25° to 35°, while the lateral pressure coefficient k ranges from 0.4 to 0.7.

(3) The frictional coefficient f

The frictional coefficient comprises the friction factor f₁ between the coal clogging segment and the surface of the drill pipe and the friction factor f₂ between the coal clogging segment and the borehole’s wall. The friction factor f₁ mainly depends on the type of drill pipe, as shown in Figure 5. When using a circular pipe, the friction coefficient will be smaller and f₁ may vary from 0.1 to 0.2. When using a spiral-ribbed drill pipe, the friction coefficient’s range will be higher: up to 0.3~0.5. Meanwhile, the friction factor f₂ between the clogging segment and the borehole’s wall mainly depends on the situation of the borehole’s wall, which is generally in the range of 0.2~0.6. However, the friction factor f₂ shows an obvious increasing trend when the borehole’s wall is destroyed.

(4) The borehole and drill pipe diameters

The diameter of a drill pipe is typically ⌀63.5 mm, ⌀73 mm, or ⌀89 mm, while those of the drill bits that are equipped by Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts are ⌀89 mm, ⌀94 mm, ⌀113 mm and ⌀133 mm for middle–hard coal seams [23]. At the same time, alloyed drill bits with diameters of ⌀120 mm, ⌀130 mm and ⌀153 mm are used for soft coal and soft rock. In field drilling construction, the value of the borehole’s diameter will be decreased due to borehole shrinkage and disturbances to the drill pipe. As a result, the diameter of a borehole is smaller than that of the drill bit in zones with serious borehole wall shrinkage, while the opposite situation obtains in zones with borehole wall expansion. On average, the diameter D of a borehole ranges from 90 mm to 160 mm.

4.2. The Relationship between the Dredging Pressure p and the Length of the Clogging Segment L

Assuming that the borehole’s diameter D is 120 mm, the drill pipe’s diameter d is 73 mm, the friction factor f₁ is 0.1, the friction factor f₂ is 0.3, the lateral pressure coefficient k is 0.5, the coal accumulation density ρ_b is 800 kg/m³ and the confining pressure p_i is 0 Pa, the dredging pressure p can be expressed as the corresponding equations that are based on Equation (12). When θ equals 5°, the borehole’s dredging pressure p can be expressed as:

p=106(^e9.55L−1)

When θ equals −5°, the borehole’s dredging pressure p can be expressed as:

p=249(^e9.55L−1).

Based on Equations (16) and (17), the relationship of fit between the dredging pressure p and the clogging segment’s length L is as shown in Figure 6.

Based on an analysis of Figure 6, the following conclusions can be drawn:

(1)

The dredging pressure is not sensitive to the clogging segment’s length when it is less than 0.6 m. However, it shows a dramatic increase with the growth of the length of the clogging segment when it is greater than 0.6 m. Once L increases to 1.0 m, the corresponding dredging pressure is more than 1.2 MPa, which will be a significant burden on a compressed-air pipe system underground. So, it will be difficult to efficiently drill the borehole if the clogging segment is not dredged in time when the clogging segment’s length is under 1.0 m with an angle of 5°.

(2)

For the downward borehole’s construction, the corresponding pink curve lies to the left of the blue curve, which shows that the demand for dredging pressure for the downward borehole is much larger than that for the upward borehole when dredging a clogging segment of the same length. So, upward boreholes should be given high priority in actual engineering operations.

4.3. The Influence of the Borehole’s Angle on Borehole Clogging

Setting the length of the clogging segment to be L = 0.6 m, while keeping the other parameters the same as in the preceding section, the dredging pressure p can be expressed as the corresponding equations that are based on Equation (12). When p_i equals 0 Pa, the borehole’s dredging pressure p can be expressed as:

p=5.47×¹⁰⁴cosθ−2.52×¹⁰⁵sinθ.

When p_i equals 1000 Pa, the borehole’s dredging pressure p can be expressed as:

p=6.13×¹⁰⁵+5.47×¹⁰⁴cosθ−2.52×¹⁰⁵sinθ.

Based on Equations (18) and (19), the relationship of fit between the dredging pressure p and the borehole’s angle is as shown in Figure 7.

Based on an analysis of Figure 7, the following conclusions can be drawn:

(1)

For the upward borehole’s construction, the dredging pressure falls rapidly as the borehole’s angle increases from 0 to π/2. For p_i = 0 Pa, the dredging pressure reaches 0 Pa when the corresponding borehole angle is 12.3°. So, the clogging segment could be dredged by gravity without the need for air pressure when the angle is over 12.3°. For p_i = 1000 Pa, affected by the confining pressure, the minimum dredging pressure falls to A₀ (π/2, 3.61 × 10⁵), which means that the minimum dredging pressure is 0.361 MPa when θ is π/2. So, the confining pressure plays a negative role in the dredging of drill cuttings.

(2)

For the construction of the horizontal borehole, the intersection points of the corresponding dredging pressure with the virtual axis along the two lines (p_i = 0 Pa, p_i = 1000 Pa) are B (0, 5.47 × 10⁴) and B₀ (0, 6.67 × 10⁵), respectively. The maximum dredging pressure of the clogging segment is 0.667 MPa and the air pressure in the majority of the pipeline is greater than the maximum dredging pressure. Therefore, for the construction of the horizontal borehole under such conditions, the clogging segment in the borehole could be dredged easily if it does not grow.

(3)

For the construction of the downward borehole with the angle range of −π/2~0, the dredging pressure reaches its maximum at D (−1.357, 2.57 × 10⁵) and D₀ (−1.357, 8.7 × 10⁵) along the two lines, respectively. So, it can be concluded that the corresponding dredging pressure will increase as the borehole’s angle increases from −π/2 to −77.7°. However, it will decrease as the borehole’s angle increases from −77.7° to 0°.

4.4. The Influence of the Confining Pressure on Borehole Clogging

Based on the influence of the borehole’s angle θ to borehole clogging, the confining pressure around the clogging segment plays a leading role in the growth of the borehole’s dredging pressure. In order to analyze the influence of the confining pressure around a clogging segment on the clogging segment, the confining pressure p_i was set at 1000 Pa, 2000 Pa and 3000 Pa and the other parameters were kept the same as in the preceding section. When p_i equals 1000 Pa, the dredging pressure p can be expressed as the corresponding equations that are based on Equation (12):

p=6.13×¹⁰⁵+5.47×¹⁰⁴cosθ−2.52×¹⁰⁵sinθ.

When p_i equals 2000 Pa, the borehole dredging pressure p can be expressed as:

p=1.23×¹⁰⁶+5.47×¹⁰⁴cosθ−2.52×¹⁰⁵sinθ.

When p_i equals 3000 Pa, the borehole dredging pressure p can be expressed as:

p=1.84×¹⁰⁶+5.47×¹⁰⁴cosθ−2.52×¹⁰⁵sinθ.

Based on Equations (20)–(22), the curves fitting the relationship between the borehole’s angle θ and the dredging pressure p under different confining pressures are shown in Figure 8. As the confining pressure p_i increases (p_i = 1000 Pa, p_i = 2000 Pa, p_i = 3000 Pa), the corresponding curve moves upward along the longitudinal axis and the amount of increase in the corresponding dredging pressures is 6.13 × 10⁵ Pa, 1.23 × 10⁵ Pa and 1.84 × 10⁵ Pa, respectively. Indeed, the minimum value of dredging pressure is more than 1.0 MPa when p_i = 2000 Pa. It would be difficult for some of China’s pipelines to meet this requirement. Additionally, there is a high risk of borehole clogging for those coal mines that have soft coal seams.

In order to address the difficulties with drilling in soft coal seams, drill rigs with high power and high torque have been introduced but little success has been reported. As mentioned above, in the process of drilling, when clogging occurs in a borehole with a certain confining pressure in the clogging segment, it will be difficult to dredge, which will force the drilling operation to terminate. Visibly, after a clogging segment has formed, a certain confining pressure p_i is formed between the clogging segment and the borehole’s wall due to the effect of the ground stress, the gas pressure, the tectonic stress and the rheological phenomenon for coal. The formation of the confining pressure p_i is one of the important factors that causes further difficulty in dredging clogging segments in boreholes.

5. The Engineering Application 5.1. The Method for Evaluating the Drilling Scheme

The flow diagram for the mechanical model of borehole clogging in the engineering application is shown in Figure 9.

The Bai Ping coal mine is located in the east of Dengfeng City, Henan Province, China. The construction site is at the 21,001 working face, 320 m away from the stopping line. The depth of the coal seam is 450 m on average, the coal seam’s sturdiness coefficient is 0.15 and the primitive gas content is 5.5 m³/t. The thickness of the coal seam varies from 0 to 18.88 m. Many drilling accidents have been recorded, such as drill pipe sticking, breaks in drill pipes and loss of drill pipes. Because of the frequent changes in the coal seam’s thickness, it is easy to bend a drill’s path into roof or floor rocks with an actual depth of only 30 to 50 m, which is far below the designed value.

5.2. Optimization of the Drilling Scheme

5.2.1. Analysis of the Mine’s Current Drilling Process

At present, a ZDY3200 drill rig with a ⌀73 mm × 1 m round drill pipe and a ⌀94 mm three-wing carbide drill bit is being applied in the Bai Ping mine. Based on the theory of fluid dynamics, the hydraulic diameter can be calculated by d_H = D − d = 94 mm − 73 mm = 21 mm and the width of the annular space for discharge is only 10.5 mm. The basic parameters of the drilling technology are shown in Table 1.

The dredging pressure p can be expressed as the corresponding equations that are based on Equation (12)

p=2055.35(^e20.25L−1).

Based on Equation (23), the curve fitting the relation between the dredging pressure p and the clogging segment’s length L is shown in Figure 10.

The highest air pressure at the construction site is P_max = 0.85 MPa at present. Based on Equation (13), the critical clogging segment length is L₀ = 0.3 m. It can be concluded that when the clogging segment length L is greater than 0.3 m, the clogging segment will not be dredged in time.

5.2.2. Improvement of the Drilling Process’s Design

Based on the analysis of the current drilling process, the following plans to improve the drilling process have been put forward:

(1)

Reducing the drilling speed. Before the plans were put forward, the drilling speed was 0.5 m/min. As a result, a large number of drill cuttings was output into the soft coal seam, resulting in frequent borehole clogging, pipe sticking and breaks in drill pipes. Therefore, in order to reduce the probability of borehole clogging, the drilling speed was reduced to 0.4 m/min.

(2)

Increasing the drill pipe’s diameter to enlarge the discharge space. The drill bit was changed to a ⌀120 mm three-wing carbide bit.

(3)

Applying a ribbed drill pipe. Based on fluid dynamics principles, the discharge space could be indirectly enlarged by reducing the hydraulic diameter d_H of the ribbed drill pipe, which is defined as follows:

_dH=4AS=π^D2−4_SPπD+_CP

where A is the cross-sectional area of the flow; S is the circumference of the contact area between the fluid and the solid in the flow section; S_P is the cross-sectional area of the drill pipe; and C_P is the circumference of the pipe’s cross-section.

The cross-sectional area of the ribbed drill pipe is S_P = 0.002665 m² and the cross-sectional circumference of the ribbed pipe is C_P = 0.20599 m. So, it can be calculated based on Equation (24) that the hydraulic diameter is d_H = 0.059 m. The equivalent diameter of the ribbed pipe is d = 0.061 m. The other parameters of the drilling technology remain the same as those in Table 1. The dredging pressure p can be expressed as the corresponding equations that are based on Equation (12):

p=2077.31(^e13.56L−1).

Combining Equations (25) and (23), the comparison of the p–L characteristic curves between the improved design and the previous scheme is shown in Figure 11.

It can be found from Figure 11 that the characteristic curve of the improved drilling technique lies to the right of that of the previous scheme. The critical clogging length of the improved design is L₀ = 0.44 m, 0.14 m longer than that of the previous drilling scheme. So, it is obvious that there will be a lower risk of borehole clogging.

5.3. Industrial Test

Sixty-one boreholes along the coal seam were drilled using the previous scheme at the test site. The sum depth of the boreholes was 4606 m and the total drilling time was 38 days with an average speed of 121 m/day. Meanwhile, 66 boreholes were drilled along the coal seam using the improved design scheme at the same test site. The sum depth of the boreholes was 5910 m and the total drilling time was about 35 days. The average depth of the boreholes was 89.5 m and the average speed was 169 m/day. The drilling depth had been improved by 18.5% on average and the drilling efficiency had been improved by 39.7%. Figure 12 shows the boreholes numbered sequentially corresponding to the depth data. The requested depth of the boreholes was 90 m. Under the previous scheme, about 25 boreholes reached the design depth, the success rate of which is 41%. Under the improved design scheme, 49 boreholes reached the design depth, the success rate of which is 74% and the deepest borehole was found to be 113 m in length.

6. Conclusions

A mechanical model of clogging segments is established that considers the confining pressure p_i that surrounds a borehole. A function for the dredging pressure p and the clogging segment’s length L was derived and the effect of the clogging segment’s length L and the borehole’s angle θ on borehole clogging was discussed.

(1)

For soft coal seams, the confining pressure p_i plays a leading role in borehole clogging. The higher the confining pressure, the greater the probability that borehole clogging will occur. The confining pressure is the key factor for borehole clogging and results in a shallow depth and low drilling efficiency in the process of drilling in soft coal seams. Therefore, giving priority to prevention, the discharge pressure should be monitored over time and the discharge space should be expanded, to prevent the formation of long clogging segments.

(2)

Based on the mechanical model of clogging segments, the drilling scheme that was previously used in the Bai Ping coal mine was evaluated and optimized. The results show that the highest air pressure at the construction site is P_max = 0.85 MPa and the critical clogging segment length is L₀ = 0.3 m, so a clogging segment will not be dredged in time to apply the previous drilling techniques. Accordingly, we put forward the following measures: a reduction in drilling speed from 0.5 m/min to 0.4 m/min, an increase in drill bit diameter from ⌀94 mm to ⌀120 mm and replacing the round drill pipe with a ribbed drill pipe. A p–L equation for the improved drilling technique was established and the results show that the characteristic curve of the improved drilling technique lies to the right of that of the previous scheme, the critical clogging length has been increased from 0.3 m to 0.44 m and the risk of borehole clogging has been lowered.

(3)

The results of the field test show that, under the improved scheme, the drilling depth and the drilling efficiency have been improved by 18.5% and 39.7%, respectively. So, the improved drilling technology scheme, which has been developed based on the new mechanical model, is more effective than the previous scheme.

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

[Image omitted. See PDF.]

Borehole Angle (°)	Borehole Diameter (m)	Drill Pipe Diameter (m)	Lateral Pressure Coefficient	Confining Pressure (Pa)	Friction Factor f1	Friction Factor f2
5	0.094	0.073	0.5	1000	0.1	0.3

Author Contributions

Y.W. developed the model and wrote the paper; Z.Y. contributed to the engineering application section; and Z.W. contributed to the introduction section.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 41872188] and Natural Science Funds of Henan Province [Grant No. 182300410126] and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 2017M621876].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

References

1. Wang, L.; Cheng, L.-B.; Cheng, Y.-P.; Yin, G.-Z.; Xu, C.; Jin, K.; Yang, Q.-L. Characteristics and evolutions of gas dynamic disaster under igneous intrusions and its control technologies. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2014, 18, 164-174.

2. Hamawand, I.; Yusaf, T.; Hamawand, S.G. Coal seam gas and associated water: A review paper. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 22, 550-560.

3. Zou, Q.; Lin, B.; Zheng, C.; Hao, Z.; Zhai, C.; Liu, T.; Liang, J.; Yan, F.; Yang, W.; Zhu, C. Novel integrated techniques of drilling-slotting-separation-sealing for enhanced coal bed methane recovery in underground coal mines. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 26, 960-973. [Green Version]

4. Zhou, H.; Zhang, R.; Cheng, Y.; Dai, H.; Ge, C.; Chen, J. Methane and coal exploitation strategy of highly outburst-prone coal seam configurations. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 23, 63-69.

5. Liu, H.; Cheng, Y. The elimination of coal and gas outburst disasters by long distance lower protective seam mining combined with stress-relief gas extraction in the Huaibei coal mine area. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 27, 346-353.

6. Karacan, C.Ö.; Ruiz, F.A.; Cotè, M.; Phipps, S. Coal mine methane: A review of capture and utilization practices with benefits to mining safety and to greenhouse gas reduction. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2011, 86, 121-156.

7. Tian, S.; Jiang, C.; Xu, L.; Yang, D.; Tang, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, X. A study of the principles and methods of quick validation of the outburst-prevention effect in the process of coal uncovering. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 30, 276-283.

8. Hao, Z.; Zhou, C.; Lin, B.; Pang, Y.; Li, Z. Pressure-relief and permeability-increase technology of high liquid-solid coupling blast and its application. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2014, 24, 45-49.

9. Lu, P.; Yuan, L.; Cheng, H.; Xue, J.; Liu, Z.; Tong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cai, R.; Deng, Z. Theory and experimental studies of enhanced gas drainage in the high-gas face of low permeability coal multi-seams. J. China Coal Soc. 2010, 35, 580-585.

10. Wang, Y.; Zhai, X.; Sun, Y. Reasonable parameters study on grooved drill pipe used in drilling outburst coal seam. J. China Coal Soc. 2011, 36, 304-307.

11. Li, D.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S. Experimental and numerical simulation study on fracturing through interlayer to coal seam. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2014, 21, 386-396.

12. Yuan, L. Theory of pressure relieved gas extraction and technique system of integrated coal production and gas extraction. J. China Coal Soc. 2009, 34, 1-8.

13. Tang, J.; Lu, Y.; Ge, Z.; Xia, B.; Sun, H.; Du, P. A new method of combined rock drilling. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2014, 24, 1-6.

14. Szlązak, N.; Obracaj, D.; Swolkień, J. Methane drainage from roof strata using an overlying drainage gallery. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 136, 99-115.

15. Fang, X.; Geng, Y.; Wang, M. Kilometer directional drilling: Simultaneous extraction of coal and gas from a high gas coal seam. J. China Univ. Min. Technol. 2012, 41, 885-892.

16. Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhai, X. Analysis on reasons of drilling difficulty in soft and outburst coal seam. J. China Coal Soc. 2012, 37, 117-121.

17. Liu, C.; Zhou, F.; Yang, K.; Xiao, X.; Liu, Y. Failure analysis of borehole liners in soft coal seam for gas drainage. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2014, 42, 274-283.

18. Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Z.; Song, W. Mechanical characteristic of borehole clogging drilling in soft and outburst coal seam. J. China Coal Soc. 2015, 40, 119-125.

19. Bai, J.; Li, N.; Zhong, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Xi, B.; Liu, H. Effect of bulk density of coking coal on Audibert-Arnu dilatation. J. China Coal Soc. 2012, 37, 332-335.

20. Shi, S.; Lei, Y.; Cao, S.; Zhang, K.; Wu, Q.; Li, F. Influence of the bulk density of coal charge on the performance of stamp coking coke. J. Wuhan Univ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 34, 285-288.

21. Dai, X.; Gu, D. Theoretical analysis and calculation of lateral pressure coefficient in granular materials. Nonferr. Met. 1992, 44, 19-23.

22. Xie, B.; Zhu, C.; Cui, D. Theoretical analysis and experimental study on pressure of silo. J. Liaoning Tech. Univ. 2007, 26, 226-227.

23. Yao, N.; Sun, R.; Ye, G. Equipment and technology of borehole construction for gas drainage in China underground mines. Coal Sci. Technol. 2008, 36, 12-16.