Content area

Abstract

Until recently almost all engineering curricula around the country required students to take one or more courses in structured programming. In order to keep up with the contemporary demands in the work o place, a need to use new educational approaches in teaching engineering courses has become essential. In recent years, due to the explosive market of high quality, user friendly, versatile and application-specific software, many programs are in the process of redesigning their requirements within ABET guidelines with regard to programming language and additional applications of specialized problem solving software in individual courses. In this paper, the authors present a study of current requirements and upcoming changes. The issues which prompted the project include inadequate application of traditional computer programming in courses, lack of student interest towards these programming courses, and a difference in attitude of engineering faculty from different degree granting programs. A survey of undergraduate engineering programs around the country is being conducted in order to understand current practices and reflection of future trends. The paper presents the methodology of survey, the profile of the respondents, faculty involvement, and factors influencing their choices of language.

Introduction Computer experience is a vital element of today’s engineering education. Engineering programs throughout the country are trying to keep pace with and stay on top of the constantly changing, upgrading and vastly improving market of computers and software. An important step in implementing, evaluating, or revising any computer ‘training’ in an undergraduate engineering program requires identification of actual customers of the program. Most commonly these customers maybe - students, companies which might hire them, and graduate schools where they may go for further education. Any revision however, must follow the very specific guidelines outlined by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). ABET has specific structured programming requirements for different engineering disciplines. This study will reflect how several engineering schools that used to have a common programming language requirement for all engineering freshrnen are gradually moving towards change. Some are offering different languages to students in different programs, while others are dropping structured programming altogether and trying to make room for more software exposure without increasing the already hefty total credit hours required for graduation. In addition to considering input from the engineering faculty at our home institutions, information was sought from over one hundred ABET accredited engineering programs in the United States, about how structured programming is being handled in their respective programs. This paper describes the findings of the survey to date.

{fig~~ 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘.>+,RIJ?: .

Details

Title
Structured Programming Courses In Engineering Present And Future Trends
Source details
Conference: 1996 Annual Conference; Location: Washington, District of Columbia; Start Date: June 23, 1996; End Date: June 26, 1996
Pages
1.395.1-1.395.4
Publication year
1996
Publication date
Jun 23, 1996
Publisher
American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE
Place of publication
Atlanta
Country of publication
United States
Source type
Conference Paper
Language of publication
English
Document type
Conference Proceedings
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2015-03-10
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
10 Mar 2015
ProQuest document ID
2317679469
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/conference-papers-proceedings/structured-programming-courses-engineering/docview/2317679469/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 1996. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://peer.asee.org/about .
Last updated
2025-11-19
Database
ProQuest One Academic