Abstract
Adaptive divergence and speciation may happen despite opposition by gene flow. Identifying the genomic basis underlying divergence with gene flow is a major task in evolutionary genomics. Most approaches (e.g., outlier scans) focus on genomic regions of high differentiation. However, not all genomic architectures potentially underlying divergence are expected to show extreme differentiation. Here, we develop an approach that combines hybrid zone analysis (i.e., focuses on spatial patterns of allele frequency change) with system‐specific simulations to identify loci inconsistent with neutral evolution. We apply this to a genome‐wide SNP set from an ideally suited study organism, the intertidal snail Littorina saxatilis, which shows primary divergence between ecotypes associated with different shore habitats. We detect many SNPs with clinal patterns, most of which are consistent with neutrality. Among non‐neutral SNPs, most are located within three large putative inversions differentiating ecotypes. Many non‐neutral SNPs show relatively low levels of differentiation. We discuss potential reasons for this pattern, including loose linkage to selected variants, polygenic adaptation and a component of balancing selection within populations (which may be expected for inversions). Our work is in line with theory predicting a role for inversions in divergence, and emphasizes that genomic regions contributing to divergence may not always be accessible with methods purely based on allele frequency differences. These conclusions call for approaches that take spatial patterns of allele frequency change into account in other systems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK; Current address: IST Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
3 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK
4 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
5 Department of Marine Sciences ‐ Tjärnö, University of Gothenburg, Strömstad, Sweden
6 CEES (Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
7 Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
8 Department of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
9 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK; Department of Marine Sciences ‐ Tjärnö, University of Gothenburg, Strömstad, Sweden





