Content area
Full Text
This note proposes one adjustment to Matthew Rabin's (1993) insightful model, which defines a "fairness equilibrium" and demonstrates some general implications of fairness on game theory and economics. One of the general implications of his model is "Proposition 5 states essentially that as material payoffs become large, the players' behavior is dominated by material self-interest. In particular, players will play only Nash equilibria if the scale of payoffs is large enough." As the utility function is written, he is correct. However, in the present article it is shown that if the relationship between material- and fairness-based utility is generalized, fairness becomes a normal good as stakes move from very high to very very high. When...