It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
To evaluate the inter-observer and inter-vendor reliability of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in the musculoskeletal system.
Methods
This prospective study included six healthy volunteers three men (mean age: 42; range: 31–52 years) and three women (mean age: 36; range: 30–44 years).
Each subject was scanned using different 3 Tesla magnetic resonance scanners from three different vendors at three different sites bilaterally. First, the intra-class correlation coefficient was used to determine between-observers agreement for overall measurements and clinical sites. Next, between-group comparisons were made through the nonparametric Friedman’s test. Finally, the Bland–Altman method was used to determine agreement among the three scanner measurements, comparing them two by two.
Results
A total of 792 measurement were calculated. ICC reported high levels of agreement between the two observers. ICC related to MD, FA, and RD measurements ranged from 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.90) to 0.95 (95% CI 0.94–0.96), from 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.88) to 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96), and from 0.89 (0.85–0.90) to 0.92 (0.90–0.94).
No statistically significant inter-vendor differences were observed. The Bland–Altmann method confirmed a high correlation between parameter values.
Conclusion
An excellent inter-observer and inter-vendor reliability was found in our study.
Key points
Diffusion tensor imaging shows excellent inter-observer reliability.
Diffusion tensor imaging shows excellent inter-vendor reliability.
Quantitative results in musculoskeletal application of diffusion tensor imaging are reproducible in all the three magnetic resonance scanners.
DTI, as a reproducible magnetic resonance sequence, can be used for a quantitative evaluation of muscle microstructures during daily practice.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Clinica di Radiologia EOC IIMSI, Lugano, Switzerland; Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
2 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.417776.4)
3 Clinica di Radiologia EOC IIMSI, Lugano, Switzerland (GRID:grid.417776.4)
4 Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262); Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6)
5 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.417776.4); University of Milano, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.4708.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 2822)
6 Clinica di Radiologia EOC IIMSI, Lugano, Switzerland (GRID:grid.4708.b)