It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Circular electron positron colliders, such as the CEPC and FCC-ee, have been proposed to measure Higgs boson properties precisely, test the Standard Model, search for physics beyond the Standard Model, and so on. One of the important goals of these colliders is to measure the W boson mass with great precision by taking data around the W-pair production threshold. In this paper, the data-taking scheme is investigated to maximize the achievable precisions of the W boson mass and width with a threshold scan, when various systematic uncertainties are taken into account. The study shows that an optimal and realistic data-taking scheme is to collect data at three center-of-mass energies and that precisions of 1.0 MeV and 3.4 MeV can be achieved for the mass and width of the W boson, respectively, with a total integrated luminosity of ab and several assumptions of the systematic uncertainty sources.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Nankai University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.216938.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9878 7032)
2 INFN, sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy (GRID:grid.470216.6)
3 IRFU, CEA, Universite Paris-Saclay, Paris, France (GRID:grid.5583.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 8025)
4 National Central University, Department of Physics and Center for High Energy and High Field Physics, Tao yuan, Taiwan (GRID:grid.37589.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0532 3167)
5 Yantai University, Department of Physics, Yantai, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.440761.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 9030 0162)
6 Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.418741.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0632 3097)
7 South China Normal University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.263785.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7397)
8 University of Michigan, Department of Physics, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
9 Sun Yat-sen University, School of Physics, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.12981.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2360 039X)