It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Various quantum applications can be reduced to estimating expectation values, which are inevitably deviated by operational and environmental errors. Although errors can be tackled by quantum error correction, the overheads are far from being affordable for near-term technologies. To alleviate the detrimental effects of errors on the estimation of expectation values, quantum error mitigation techniques have been proposed, which require no additional qubit resources. Here we benchmark the performance of a quantum error mitigation technique based on probabilistic error cancellation in a trapped-ion system. Our results clearly show that effective gate fidelities exceed physical fidelities, i.e., we surpass the break-even point of eliminating gate errors, by programming quantum circuits. The error rates are effectively reduced from (1.10 ± 0.12) × 10−3 to (1.44 ± 5.28) × 10−5 and from (0.99 ± 0.06) × 10−2 to (0.96 ± 0.10) × 10−3 for single- and two-qubit gates, respectively. Our demonstration opens up the possibility of implementing high-fidelity computations on a near-term noisy quantum device.
Quantum error mitigation promises to improve expectation values’ estimation without the resource overhead of quantum error correction. Here, the authors test probabilistic error cancellation using trapped ions, decreasing single- and two-qubit gates’ error rates by two and one order of magnitude respectively.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Lu, Yao 1 ; Zhang, Kuan 2 ; Chen, Wentao 1 ; Li, Ying 3
; Jing-Ning, Zhang 4 ; Kim, Kihwan 1
1 Tsinghua University, Center for Quantum Information, Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178)
2 Tsinghua University, Center for Quantum Information, Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178); Huazhong University of Science and Technology, MOE Key Laboratory of Fundamental Physical Quantities Measurements, Hubei Key Laboratory of Gravitation and Quantum Physics, PGMF and School of Physics, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.33199.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7223)
3 Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33)
4 Tsinghua University, Center for Quantum Information, Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178); Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33)




