Abstract
Background
Statins inhibit proliferative signalling in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and their use is associated with better survival in observational studies. The present study was undertaken to examine the feasibility of assessing adjuvant statin therapy in patients with operable OAC in a phase III RCT.
Methods
For this multicentre, double‐blind, parallel‐group, randomized, placebo‐controlled feasibility trial, adults with OAC (including Siewert I–II lesions) who had undergone oesophagectomy were centrally allocated (1 : 1) to simvastatin 40 mg or matching placebo by block randomization, stratified by centre. Participants, clinicians and investigators were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients received treatment for up to 1 year. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention, drug absorption, adherence, safety, quality of life, generalizability and survival.
Results
A total of 120 patients were assessed for eligibility at four centres, of whom 32 (26·7 per cent) were randomized, 16 in each group. Seven patients withdrew. Participants allocated to simvastatin had lower low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 3 months (adjusted mean difference −0·83 (95 per cent c.i. −1·4 to −0·22) mmol/l; P = 0·009). Median adherence to medication was greater than 90 per cent between 3 and 12 months' follow‐up. Adverse events were similar between the groups. Quality‐of‐life data were complete for 98·3 per cent of questionnaire items. Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and aspirin use were more prevalent in the non‐randomized group, whereas tumour site, stage and grade were similar between groups. Survival estimates were imprecise.
Conclusion
This RCT supports the conduct and informs the design considerations for a future phase III trial of adjuvant statin therapy in patients with OAC. Registration number: ISRCTN98060456 (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Clark, A B 1 ; Walton, S 2 ; Lewis, M P 3 ; Kumar, B 3 ; Cheong, E C 3 ; Warren, H 4 ; Kadirkamanathan, S S 5 ; Parsons, S L 6 ; Dresner, S M 7 ; Sims, E 1 ; Jones, M 1 ; Hammond, M 1 ; Flather, M 1 ; Loke, Y K 1 ; Swart, A M 1 ; Hart, A R 1 1 Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
2 Cancer Research Team and, Norwich, UK
3 Department of General Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
4 Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, UK
5 Department of General Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, Chelmsford, UK
6 Department of Surgery, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
7 Department of General Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK





