It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Soil microbial communities are suitable soil ecosystem health indicators due to their sensitivity to management practices and role in soil ecosystem processes. Presently, information on structural and functional differentiation of bacterial communities in post-coal mining reclamation soils of South Africa is sparse. Here, bacterial communities in three post-coal mining reclamation soils were investigated using community-level physiological profiling (CLPP), enzyme activities, and next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. Inferences were drawn in reference to adjacent unmined soils. CLPP-based species diversity and proportionality did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) whereas activities of β-glucosidase, urease and phosphatases were significantly (P < 0.05) influenced by site and soil history (reclaimed vs unmined). Bacterial communities were influenced (PERMANOVA, P < 0.05) by soil history and site differences, with several phylotypes differentially abundant between soils. Contrastingly, predicted functional capabilities of bacterial communities were not different (PERMANOVA, P > 0.05), suggesting redundancy in bacterial community functions between reclamation and unmined soils. Silt content, bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, Na and Ca significantly influenced soil bacterial communities. Overall, results indicate that bacterial community structure reflects underlying differences between soil ecosystems, and suggest the restoration of bacterial diversity and functions over chronological age in reclamation soils.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 North-West University, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Potchefstroom, South Africa (GRID:grid.25881.36) (ISNI:0000 0000 9769 2525); Climate and Water, Arcadia, Agricultural Research Council-Institute for Soil, Pretoria, South Africa (GRID:grid.25881.36); Universite Laval, Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (IBIS), Quebec City, Canada (GRID:grid.23856.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8390)
2 North-West University, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Potchefstroom, South Africa (GRID:grid.25881.36) (ISNI:0000 0000 9769 2525)
3 Universite Laval, Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (IBIS), Quebec City, Canada (GRID:grid.23856.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8390); Universite Laval, Centre for Forest Research, Faculty of Forestry, Geography and Geomatics, Quebec City, Canada (GRID:grid.23856.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8390)
4 North-West University, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Potchefstroom, South Africa (GRID:grid.25881.36) (ISNI:0000 0000 9769 2525); Climate and Water, Arcadia, Agricultural Research Council-Institute for Soil, Pretoria, South Africa (GRID:grid.25881.36)