It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Flowstone speleothem growth beneath Mount Arthur, New Zealand shows a clear relationship to vegetation density and soil development on the surface above. Flowstone does not currently form beneath sub-alpine Nothofagus forest above ca. 1000–1100 m altitude but U-Th dating shows it has formed there during past intervals of warmer-than-present conditions including an early–mid Holocene optimum and the last interglacial from ca. 131–119 ka. Some flowstones growing beneath ca. 600 m surface altitude, currently mantled with dense broadleaf-podocarp forest, grew during full glacial conditions, indicating that local tree line was never below this altitude. This implies that Last Glacial Maximum annual temperature was no more than ca. 4 °C cooler than today. Flowstone growth appears to be a robust indicator of dense surface vegetation and well-developed soil cover in this setting, and indicates that past interglacial climates of MIS 7e, 5e, the early–mid Holocene and possibly MIS 5a were more conducive to growth of trees than was the late Holocene, reflecting regional temperature changes similar in timing to Antarctic temperature changes. Here, flowstone speleothem growth is a sensitive indicator of vegetation density at high altitude, but may respond to other factors at lower altitudes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
2 School of Geography, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); Laboratoire EDYTEM, CNRS, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Université Grenoble Alpes, Chambéry, France (GRID:grid.5388.6)
3 Laboratoire EDYTEM, CNRS, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Université Grenoble Alpes, Chambéry, France (GRID:grid.5388.6); School of Geography, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
4 Environmental Research Institute, School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (GRID:grid.49481.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0408 3579)
5 Croatian Geological Survey, Sachsova 2, Zagreb, Croatia (GRID:grid.454296.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2228 4671)




