Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Black carbon (BC) aerosols have been widely recognized as a vital climate forcer in the atmosphere. Amplification of light absorption can occur due to coatings on BC during atmospheric aging, an effect that remains uncertain in accessing the radiative forcing of BC. Existing studies on the absorption enhancement factor (Eabs) have poor coverage on both seasonal and diurnal scales. In this study, we applied a recently developed minimum R squared (MRS) method, which can cover both seasonal and diurnal scales, for Eabs quantification. Using field measurement data in Guangzhou, the aims of this study are to explore (1) the temporal dynamics of BC optical properties at seasonal (wet season, 31 July–10 September; dry season, 15 November 2017–15 January 2018) and diel scales (1 h time resolution) in the typical urban environment and (2) the influencing factors onEabs temporal variability. Mass absorption efficiency at 520 nm by primary aerosols (MAEp520) determined by the MRS method exhibited a strong seasonality (8.6 m2 g-1 in the wet season and 16.8 m2 g-1 in the dry season). Eabs520 was higher in the wet season (1.51±0.50) and lower in the dry season (1.29±0.28). Absorption Ångström exponent (AAE470660) in the dry season (1.46±0.12) was higher than that in the wet season (1.37±0.10). Collective evidence showed that the active biomass burning (BB) in the dry season effectively altered the optical properties of BC, leading to elevated MAE, MAEp and AAE in the dry season compared to those in the wet season. Diurnal Eabs520 was positively correlated with AAE470660 (R2=0.71) and negatively correlated with the AE33 aerosol loading compensation parameter (k) (R2=0.74) in the wet season, but these correlations were significantly weaker in the dry season, which may be related to the impact of BB. This result suggests that during the wet season, the lensing effect was more likely dominating the AAE diurnal variability rather than the contribution from brown carbon (BrC). Secondary processing can affect Eabs diurnal dynamics. The Eabs520 exhibited a clear dependency on the ratio of secondary organic carbon to organic carbon (SOC/OC), confirming the contribution of secondary organic aerosols toEabs; Eabs520 correlated well with nitrate and showed a clear dependence on temperature. This new finding implies that gas–particle partitioning of semivolatile compounds may potentially play an important role in steering the diurnal fluctuation of Eabs520. In the dry season, the diurnal variability in Eabs520 was associated with photochemical aging as evidenced by the good correlation (R2=0.69) between oxidant concentrations (Ox=O3+NO2) and Eabs520.

Details

Title
Amplification of black carbon light absorption induced by atmospheric aging: temporal variation at seasonal and diel scales in urban Guangzhou
Author
Jia Yin Sun 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Wu, Cheng 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Wu, Dui 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Cheng, Chunlei 1 ; Li, Mei 1 ; Li, Lei 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Deng, Tao 3 ; Yu, Jian Zhen 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Li, Yong Jie 5 ; Zhou, Qianni 1 ; Liang, Yue 1 ; Sun, Tianlin 1 ; Lang, Song 1 ; Cheng, Peng 1 ; Yang, Wenda 1 ; Chenglei Pei 6 ; Chen, Yanning 7 ; Cen, Yanxiang 8 ; Nian, Huiqing 8 ; Zhou, Zhen 1 

 Institute of Mass Spectrometry and Atmospheric Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China; Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Online Source Apportionment System of Air Pollution, Guangzhou 510632, China 
 Institute of Mass Spectrometry and Atmospheric Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China; Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Online Source Apportionment System of Air Pollution, Guangzhou 510632, China; Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, CMA, Guangzhou 510080, China 
 Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, CMA, Guangzhou 510080, China 
 Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China; Division of Environment and Sustainability, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China; Atmospheric Research Center, HKUST Fok Ying Tung Research Institute, Guangzhou 511400, China 
 Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau, China 
 State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Guangzhou Environmental Monitoring Center, Guangzhou 510030, China 
 Guangzhou Environmental Monitoring Center, Guangzhou 510030, China 
 Guangzhou Hexin Analytical Instrument Company Limited, Guangzhou 510530, China 
Pages
2445-2470
Publication year
2020
Publication date
2020
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
ISSN
16807316
e-ISSN
16807324
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2366571948
Copyright
© 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.