It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Statisticians have wrestled with the question of sample size in exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis for decades, some looking at total N, some at the ratio of subjects to items. Although many articles attempt to examine this issue, few examine both possibilities comprehensively enough to be definitive. This study examines a previously published data set to examine whether N or subject to item ratio is more important in predicting important outcomes in PCA. The results indicate an interaction between the two, where the best outcomes occur in analyses where large Ns and high ratios are present.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer




