Introduction
Although spinal cord injury (SCI) comprises primary injuries and secondary injuries, the secondary injury plays a more important role in the recovery of neurological function after spinal cord injury. Secondary injury is mainly caused by oxidative stress, immune dysfunction, the occurrence of apoptosis, and autophagy inhibition (Beattie, 2004). In recent years, an increasing number of studies have focused on the neuroprotective effects of drugs with regard to neurological function and mechanisms of action after SCI. For example, rapamycin promotes recovery of neurological function by activating nerve cell autophagy, and melatonin promotes recovery of neurological function by inhibiting oxidative stress and apoptosis (Chen et al., 2013; Naseem and Parvez, 2014). However, the specific molecular mechanisms of functional recovery after SCI and treatment measures have not been clearly stated. In recent years, researchers have questioned the efficacy of methylprednisolone, the first-line therapeutic drug for SCI (Liu et al., 2009; Tesiorowski et al., 2013; Fehlings et al., 2014; Harrop, 2014). Methylprednisolone increases the risk of SCI complications, such as infection, pulmonary embolism, and even death (Hurlbert et al., 2015), which highlights the urgency of a novel treatment strategy for SCI.
Statins are one of the first-line therapeutic drugs for treating diseases such as high cholesterol, coronary atherosclerosis, and atherosclerosis (Komukai et al., 2014; Pordal et al., 2015). The statins mainly comprise atorvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin (Pursnani et al., 2015; Schultz et al., 2015). Some studies have focused on the non-cholesterol-lowering effect of statins. For instance, lovastatin exhibits antioxidant properties, suppresses apoptosis and schwannoma cell differentiation, and induces autophagy (Sane et al., 2010; Abdanipour et al., 2014). Simvastatin activates Wnt signaling in nerve cells, inhibits apoptosis and inflammatory reactions, and accelerates expression of neurotrophic factors (Holmberg et al., 2006; Esposito et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2015a). Atorvastatin works by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. In recent years, the diverse effects of atorvastatin in the central nervous system have been a concern. Atorvastatin inhibits early apoptosis after thoracic SCI and promotes recovery of neurological function (Dery et al., 2009). Atorvastatin also activates autophagy in mesenchymal stem cells via the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway, suppresses apoptosis, and protects cells against injury (Zhang et al., 2012). Some studies have reported that atorvastatin promotes axonal regeneration and nerve growth (Aktas et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2003). Unfortunately, the specific role of atorvastatin on recovery of neurological function after SCI has not been clearly verified.
Autophagy plays an important role in secondary injury after SCI (Goldshmit et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015a). Autophagy is a survival-promoting pathway that captures, degrades, and recycles intracellular proteins and organelles in lysosomes. The autophagosome fuses with a lysosome and the contents are degraded and recycled. The resulting breakdown products are inputs of cellular metabolism for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis (Komatsu et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2012). During the formation of autophagy bodies, light chain 3 (LC3) shifts from the non-esterified form (LC3A) to the esterified form (LC3B). The formation of LC3B leads to the formation of autophagosomes (Kabeya et al., 2000; Chen et al., 2012). Beclin-1 protein is also used as a marker for autophagy (Levine and Kroemer, 2008).
Wang et al. (2015a) showed activated autophagy and inhibited apoptosis after SCI, which led to recovery of neurological function. Therefore, in the present study, we associated atorvastatin with autophagy after SCI, and hypothesized that atorvastatin exerts a neuroprotective effect by influencing autophagy.
Materials and Methods
Animals
A total of 54 male 8-12-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 260-300 g, were purchased from Charles River, Beijing, China (license No. SCXK (Jing) 2012-0001). The rats were housed in individual cages in the Specific Pathogen-Free Animal Experimental Center of Jinzhou Medical University of China under a 12-hour light/dark cycle and in a dry and ventilated room at 23-25°C, with free access to food and water. All surgery was performed under anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize pain and distress in the experimental animals. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the United States National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animal (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1986). The protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Liaoning Medical University of China.
Model establishment and intervention
A total of 54 male rats were equally and randomly allocated to the SCI + atorvastatin (SCI + Ato group), SCI + saline, and sham groups. In the SCI + Ato and SCI + saline groups, rat models of SCI were established using the method described previously (Gao et al., 2015b). In the SCI + Ato group, atorvastatin (5 mg atorvastatin was dissolved in 1 mL saline; 5 mg/kg; Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) was intraperitoneally injected immediately after model establishment. An equal volume of atorvastatin was injected again at 1 and 2 days after SCI (Dery et al., 2009). In the SCI + saline group, saline (1 mL; 1 mL/kg) was intraperitoneally injected at the same time. In the sham group, rats only underwent laminectomy, but did not receive SCI.
Establishing models of SCI
SCI models were established based on the method by Allen (Gao et al., 2015b). The rats were intraperitoneally anesthetized with 10% chloral hydrate (0.3 mL/kg). The T 9/10 spinous process was exposed and clamped with rongeur forceps. After removal of the vertebral plate, the spinal cord was exposed. A 10-g 2-mm diameter impactor was vertically dropped from a 2.5-cm height, which directly impacted the spinal cord at T 9/10 . Congestion at the injury site, rapid contraction, tremor of the lower limbs, and incontinence confirmed successful establishment of the model. Any rats where the model was not established were eliminated from the study. The wound was washed with warm saline, and the tissue was sutured layer by layer. The surface was covered with sterile gauze. After surgery, the rats were housed in the Specific Pathogen-Free Animal Experimental Center of Liaoning Medical University of China, and injected with antibiotics for 3 consecutive days. Urinary bladder massage and extrusion were performed three times daily until autonomic function of urination resumed.
Evaluation of motor function
Motor function was assessed in six rats from each group before surgery, and then 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after surgery using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scale (Basso et al., 1995). The BBB scores ranged from 0 to 21, where 21 = normal and 0 = complete paralysis.
Western blot assay
At 7 days post-injury, the rats were intraperitoneally anesthetized with 10% chloral hydrate 0.3 mL/kg (n = 4 per group). After exposing the spinal cord, a 3-mm spinal cord section from the center of the injury site was collected and lysed with radioimmune precipitation assay buffer, which contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, and 1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay, and samples were diluted to a concentration of 2 μg/μL. Protein samples (40 μg) were then separated by electrophoresis on 12% separation gels. The separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and then blocked with confining liquid (5% skim milk powder and 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS) at room temperature for 2 hours, and incubated overnight at 4°C with hybridization solution-diluted primary antibody: rabbit anti-Beclin-1, LC3B, caspase-9, caspase-3, and β-actin polyclonal antibodies (1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The following day, the membranes were incubated with hybridization solution-diluted secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG; 1:2,000; Abcam) at room temperature for 2 hours. Images were collected using the UVP gel imaging system (UVP, Upland, CA, USA). Gray values of specific bands were measured using the ImageJ2x system (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Results represented the optical density ratio of the target protein to β-actin.
Reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
At 7 days post-injury, the rats were intraperitoneally anesthetized with 10% chloral hydrate 0.3 mL/kg (n = 4 per group). After exposing the spinal cord, a 3-mm spinal cord section from the center of the injury site was collected and total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen, Grand Island, CA, USA). From each sample, 1 μg total RNA was converted to cDNA using the TaKaRa RNA PCRTM Kit (AMV 8) Ver. 3.0. (TaKaRa Bio Inc, Shiga, Japan). With the cDNA serving as a template, the cDNA was amplified in a gradient cycler (Mastercycler Gradient; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) with the following conditions: one cycle of 5 minutes at 94°C; 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C (denaturalization), 30 seconds at 60°C (annealing), and 30 seconds at 72°C (extension); and one cycle of 10 minutes at 72°C (amplification). The sequences of primers used for RT-PCR are shown in [Table 1]. RT-PCR products were electrophoretically separated on agarose gels. Images were collected using the UVP gel imaging system (UVP). Gray values of specific bands were measured using the ImageJ2x system (National Institutes of Health). Results represented the optical density ratio of the target gene to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).{Table 1}
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay
At 7 days post-injury, the rats were intraperitoneally anesthetized with 10% chloral hydrate 0.3 mL/kg (n = 4 per group). The rats were perfused with 0.9% saline and 4% paraformaldehyde. After exposing the spinal cord, a spinal cord tissue (1 cm) section was collected from the center of the injury site. The tissue was then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 days, and dehydrated with 30% sucrose for 3 days. An approximately 3-mm section of the spinal cord proximal to the injury site on the side of the head was sliced into frozen sections using a freezing microtome (Leica CM3050S; Heidelberg, Germany). The sections on the slides were incubated in fixative at room temperature for 20 minutes, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 minutes, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 2 minutes at 4°C, washed twice with PBS, and then incubated with TUNEL staining mixture (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at 37°C in the dark for 1 hour. Afterwards, samples were incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (1:1,000) in the dark for 2 minutes, and mounted with glycerol. Apoptosis was observed using a fluorescence microscope. Apoptotic cells were labeled by TUNEL (red; DNA fragments after apoptosis) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (blue; nucleus). The proportion of TUNEL-positive cells was calculated by the number of apoptotic cells/total number of cells.
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as the mean ± SD, and analyzed using the Graph Prism Program, Version 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance and the least significant difference test were used to compare differences in intergroup data. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Atorvastatin effects on recovery of neurological function after SCI
No significant difference in motor function was detected in any rats prior to model establishment. On day 1 post-injury, rats from the SCI + Ato and SCI + saline groups scored 0 (complete paralysis), and these BBB scores increased with prolonged time. During the two weeks immediately following injury, there was no significant difference in BBB scores between the SCI + Ato group and SCI + saline group (P > 0.05). Between 2 and 6 weeks post-injury, the BBB scores were significantly increased in the SCI + Ato group compared with the SCI + saline group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001; [Figure 1]). {Figure 1}
Effects of atorvastatin on apoptosis in rats with SCI
At 7 days post-injury, western blot assay results revealed increased caspase-9 and caspase-3 expression, respectively, in the SCI + saline group (P < 0.001). Caspase-9 and caspase-3 expression was significantly inhibited in the SCI + Ato group, respectively (P < 0.01, P < 0.001), suggesting that atorvastatin significantly suppressed apoptosis after SCI ([Figure 2]). {Figure 2}
TUNEL results showed significantly more TUNEL-positive cells in the SCI + saline group compared with the sham group (P < 0.001). The number of TUNEL-positive cells was significantly less in the SCI + Ato group than in the SCI + saline group (P < 0.01; [Figure 3]).{Figure 3}
Effects of atorvastatin on autophagy after SCI
At 7 days post-injury, western blot assay and RT-PCR results revealed significantly increased Beclin-1 and LC3B protein and gene expression, respectively, in the SCI + saline group compared with the sham group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001). Compared with the SCI + saline group, Beclin-1 and LC3B protein expression was significantly higher in the SCI + Ato group (P < 0.01, P < 0.001; [Figure 4]). {Figure 4}
Discussion
Results from the present study confirmed that atorvastatin significantly up-regulated Beclin-1 and LC3B gene and protein expression, respectively, after SCI, suggesting that atorvastatin activated autophagy. Atorvastatin also suppressed caspase-9 and caspase-3 expression. Similarly, atorvastatin significantly reduced the proportion of apoptotic cells in the anterior horn of the spinal cord after SCI and promoted cell survival. These results verified that atorvastatin exerted neuroprotective effects after SCI by activating autophagy and inhibiting apoptosis.
To test the effects of atorvastatin on functional recovery of motor nerves after SCI, BBB scores were used to observe motor function. Results demonstrated that after 2 weeks, the BBB scores were significantly higher in the SCI + Ato group than in the SCI + saline group (P < 0.05). BBB scores in the SCI + Ato group peaked between 5 and 6 weeks. These findings showed that atorvastatin significantly improved motor function following SCI, suggesting that atorvastatin could provide neuroprotective effects.
To further verify the neuroprotective effect of atorvastatin, we measured apoptosis. (Yuan and Yankner, 2000) showed that apoptosis played an important role in the occurrence and development of central nervous system diseases, such as Alzheimer′s disease. When they looked at the effects of SCI, the occurrence of apoptosis seriously affected recovery of neurological function, showing that neuronal apoptosis is negatively associated with SCI recovery (Yuan and Yankner, 2000). In some studies, decreased caspase-3 and caspase-9 expression after SCI suggested inhibition of apoptosis, which likely reduced neuronal loss and promoted recovery of neurological function (Gong et al., 2014; Ozdemir et al., 2015). Our results demonstrated that atorvastatin inhibited apoptosis after SCI, promoted cell survival, provided a favorable environment for the recovery of motor nerve function in rats, and resulted in the recovery of neurological function. Nevertheless, very little is known about the precise molecular mechanisms that are involved in the neuroprotective effect of atorvastatin after SCI.
Chen et al. (2013) showed that rapamycin induces autophagy by suppressing the mTOR signaling pathway, and accelerates recovery of neurological function following SCI. Methylprednisolone has also been shown to exert neuroprotective effects by inhibiting neuronal autophagy (Chen et al., 2012). Our previous study confirmed that vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits the inflammatory response by activating autophagy, which ultimately promotes functional recovery of motor nerves (Wang et al., 2015a). Another study verified that atorvastatin activates autophagy through the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, leading to improved left ventricular function and hypertension (Wang et al., 2015b). Atorvastatin has also been shown to prevent vascular smooth muscle calcification by inducing autophagy and promoting apoptosis of prostate cancer cells (Liu et al., 2014). However, further studies are needed to better understand the relationship between atorvastatin and autophagy after SCI. Our results suggested that atorvastatin significantly increased Beclin-1 and LC3B gene and protein expression, respectively by 7 days after SCI, indicating that atorvastatin activated autophagy, which may promote recovery of neurological function.
Our experiments not only verify the protective effect of atorvastatin on motor nerves after SCI, but also show that atorvastatin exerts neuroprotective effects by activating autophagy. Our findings may provide a novel molecular mechanism for the clinical application of atorvastatin in the treatment of SCI. Unfortunately, our experiments only validated the effect of atorvastatin on autophagy in whole cells of spinal cord tissue after SCI, and we did not observe autophagy in neurons and glial cells. Further studies are required to investigate the neuroprotective effects of atorvastatin on SCI at different time points (acute stage and chronic stage), to observe the effect of atorvastatin on autophagy in various neural cells, and to provide a theoretical and experimental basis for the treatment of SCI with atorvastatin. [35]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2016. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Atorvastatin, a lipid-lowering medication, provides neuroprotective effects, although the precise mechanisms of action remain unclear. Our previous studies confirmed activated autophagy following spinal cord injury, which was conducive to recovery of neurological functions. We hypothesized that atorvastatin could also activate autophagy after spinal cord injury, and subsequently improve recovery of neurological functions. A rat model of spinal cord injury was established based on the Allen method. Atorvastatin (5 mg/kg) was intraperitoneally injected at 1 and 2 days after spinal cord injury. At 7 days post-injury, western blot assay, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining results showed increased Beclin-1 and light chain 3B gene and protein expressions in the spinal cord injury + atorvastatin group. Additionally, caspase-9 and caspase-3 expression was decreased, and the number of TUNEL-positive cells was reduced. Compared with the spinal cord injury + saline group, Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan locomotor rating scale scores significantly increased in the spinal cord injury + atorvastatin group at 14-42 days post-injury. These findings suggest that atorvastatin activated autophagy after spinal cord injury, inhibited apoptosis, and promoted recovery of neurological function.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Physiology, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province
2 Department of Orthopedics, Jinzhou Municipal Second Hospital, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province
3 Department of Orthopedics, Jining No. 1 People′s Hospital, Jining, Shandong Province
4 Jinzhou Central Hospital, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province
5 Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province
6 Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao City, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province