It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Replicative DNA polymerases (DNAPs) have evolved the ability to copy the genome with high processivity and fidelity. In Eukarya and Archaea, the processivity of replicative DNAPs is greatly enhanced by its binding to the proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) that encircles the DNA. We determined the cryo-EM structure of the DNA-bound PolD–PCNA complex from Pyrococcus abyssi at 3.77 Å. Using an integrative structural biology approach — combining cryo-EM, X-ray crystallography, protein–protein interaction measurements, and activity assays — we describe the molecular basis for the interaction and cooperativity between a replicative DNAP and PCNA. PolD recruits PCNA via a complex mechanism, which requires two different PIP-boxes. We infer that the second PIP-box, which is shared with the eukaryotic Polα replicative DNAP, plays a dual role in binding either PCNA or primase, and could be a master switch between an initiation and a processive phase during replication.
Replicative DNA polymerases (DNAPs) have evolved the ability to copy the genome with high processivity and fidelity. Here, the authors present a cryo-EM structure of the DNA-bound PolD–PCNA complex from Pyrococcus abyssi to reveal the molecular basis for the interaction and cooperativity between a replicative DNAP and PCNA.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Institut Pasteur and CNRS UMR 3528, Unit of Structural Dynamics of Macromolecules, Paris, France (GRID:grid.428999.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2353 6535)
2 Université de Brest, Laboratoire de Microbiologie des Environnements Extrêmes, CNRS, Ifremer, Plouzané, France (GRID:grid.6289.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 0893)
3 Institut Pasteur and CNRS UMR 3528, Unit of Structural Dynamics of Macromolecules, Paris, France (GRID:grid.428999.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2353 6535); Sorbonne Université, École Doctorale Complexité du Vivant (ED515), Paris, France (GRID:grid.462844.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 1657)
4 Utech UBI, Institut Pasteur, CNRS UMR 3528, Paris, France (GRID:grid.428999.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2353 6535)
5 Institut Pasteur, CNRS UMR 3528, Molecular Biophysics Platform, C2RT, Paris, France (GRID:grid.428999.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2353 6535)
6 Stockholm University, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.10548.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9377); KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Applied Physics, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.5037.1) (ISNI:0000000121581746)
7 Stockholm University, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.10548.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9377)