It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Although coal swelling/shrinking during coal seam gas extraction has been studied for decades, its impacts on the evolution of permeability are still not well understood. This has long been recognized, but no satisfactory solutions have been found. In previous studies, it is normally assumed that the matrix swelling/shrinking strain can be split between the fracture and the bulk coal and that the splitting coefficient remains unchanged during gas sorption. In this study, we defined the fracture strain as a function of permeability change ratio and back-calculated the fracture strains at different states. In the equilibrium state, the gas pressure is steady within the coal; in the non-equilibrium state, the gas pressure changes with time. For equilibrium states, the back-calculated fracture strains are extremely large and may be physically impossible in some case. For non-equilibrium states, two experiments were conducted: one for a natural coal sample and the other for a reconstructed one. For the fractured coal, the evolution of permeability is primarily controlled by the transition of coal fracture strain or permeability from local matrix swelling effect to global effect. For the reconstituted coal, the evolution of pore strain or permeability is primarily controlled by the global effect.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309); University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410726.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1797 8419); China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), School of Energy and Mining Engineering, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.411510.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 9030 231X)
2 The University of Western Australia, School of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, Crawley, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910)
3 Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
4 The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, G3 Centre and Energy Institute, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
5 China University of Mining and Technology, IoT Perception Mine Research Center, Xuzhou, China (GRID:grid.411510.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 9030 231X)
6 China University of Geosciences, Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.503241.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 9015)