It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Lymphatic contractions play a fundamental role in maintaining tissue and organ homeostasis. The lymphatic system relies on orchestrated contraction of collecting lymphatic vessels, via lymphatic muscle cells and one-way valves, to transport lymph from the interstitial space back to the great veins, against an adverse pressure gradient. Circumferential stretch is known to regulate contractile function in collecting lymphatic vessels; however, less is known about the role of axial stretch in regulating contraction. It is likely that collecting lymphatic vessels are under axial strain in vivo and that the opening and closing of lymphatic valves leads to significant changes in axial strain throughout the pumping cycle. The purpose of this paper is to quantify the responsiveness of lympatic pumping to altered axial stretch. In situ measurements suggest that rat tail collecting lymphatic vessels are under an axial stretch of ~1.24 under normal physiological loads. Ex vivo experiments on isolated rat tail collecting lymphatics showed that the contractile metrics such as contractile amplitude, frequency, ejection fraction, and fractional pump flow are sensitive to axial stretch. Multiphoton microscopy showed that the predominant orientation of collagen fibers is in the axial direction, while lymphatic muscle cell nuclei and actin fibers are oriented in both circumferential and longitudinal directions, suggesting an axial component to contraction. Taken together, these results demonstrate the significance of axial stretch in lymphatic contractile function, suggest that axial stretch may play an important role in regulating lymph transport, and demonstrate that changes in axial strains could be an important factor in disease progression.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943)
2 The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943)
3 The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943); The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943); The Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943)