Received: 20 July 2018 /Accepted: 23 January 2020 /Published: 13 February 2020
Abstract: The influence of spirulina extract (SPE) in the process of somatic embryo (SE) induction of Coffea arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 was studied. The explants of the second expanded leaves (2nd leaves) were cultured on solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1 µМ 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) + 5 µМ 6-benzlyaminopurine (BA). The SPE was varied in the following order: 0%, 3%, 4% and 5% (v/v). To determine the germination of SE, 6-month-old cotyledonary embryos were cultured on MS medium without plant growth regulators (PGRs). The results showed that cells of the 2nd leaves developed callus within 1 month. Some of the obtained calli developed into SEs on the same medium within 3 months. The maximum percentage of SE induction (61%) was obtained from the leaves cultured on MS medium supplemented with 3% SPE + 1 µМ 2,4-D + 5 µМ BA. The somatic embryos germinated to shoots and some germinated to secondary somatic embryos on PGR-free MS medium. After 7 months, approximately 26-28% of the somatic embryos had developed into normal plantlets. This protocol would be useful for SE induction and somaclonal variation reduction in hybrid coffee.
Keywords: somatic embryo, explants, spirulina extract, leaves, hybrid coffee, Coffea arabica
INTRODUCTION
Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.), an allotetraploid (2n=4x=44) and self-fertilising plant [1, 2], is one of the main agricultural export goods of Thailand. Currently, C. arabica accounts for about 65% of coffee production in the world, while C. canephora (Robusta) provides most of the remaining 35% of production [3]. Moreover, coffee is the world's largest traded commodity after oil production [4]. In 2018, the economic importance of green and roast beans was evident through the exports from Thailand, valued at THB 137 million. It is an extremely important perennial agricultural crop in Thailand with annual production exceeding 633,000 kilograms of green and roast beans [5].
At present, C. arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 has been reported with the characteristics of leaf rust resistance in Thailand [6]. This variety is the offspring of the cross between C. arabica cv. Caturra rojo and a hybrid from Timor (a natural cross of C. arabica x C. canephora). It provides a low-caffeine coffee with fine aroma underlying its well-known, superior quality. Although a resistant coffee hybrid has been announced, there are other problems to consider, such as the low rate of propagation [7]. Seed propagation results in uncontrolled genetic variation in heterozygous cultivars, a slow rate of multiplication and a short span of seed viability [8]. Consequently, seed is not recommended for hybrid coffee propagation because of the segregation in the F2 generation. There is a greater genetic uniformity in coffee propagation via vegetative grafting or rooting of cuttings, but these are labour-intensive and time-consuming for large-scale production [9].
Tissue culture via somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis provides a better chance for the production of true-to-type hybrid plantlets on a large scale within a short period [6, 10]. Organogenesis of C. arabica has low efficiency owing to technical difficulties such as explant sterilisation, high concentration of phenolic compounds, apical dominancy, and a low rate of shoot multiplication [11]. However, somatic embryogenesis might be the most effective technique because of its potential for producing the highest rate of multiplication with a lower production cost [4, 12, 13]. Somatic embryogenesis of coffee was first reported by Staritsky [14], when it was induced from internode sections of C. canephora P. ex Fr, followed by leaf sections which increased the frequency of somatic embryos [15, 16].
The somatic embryogenesis of coffee can be achieved via direct somatic embryogenesis (DSE), indirect somatic embryogenesis (ISE) or secondary somatic embryogenesis (SSE) [17]. DSE is characterised by the induction of somatic embryos from pre-embryogenic cells of vegetative tissues, creating an identical clone. Somatic embryos are developed from friable embryogenic callus in ISE [18, 19], while SSE is the process of somatic embryos which are formed from primary embryos [20]. Electron microscopy studies have shown that embryogenic calli are yellowish, friable callus which has a spherical shape and brown callus which is elongated [21]. ISE facilitates the large-scale production of somatic embryos for selected coffee clones and hybrids [22]. DSE can avoid the problem of somaclonal variation. However, the number of somaclones produced through DSE is usually limited and not uniform [10]. Therefore, ISE for crop applications must be improved in order to decrease the production of somaclones from genetic variation at the callus stage by increasing the efficiency of callus development.
The success of induction through somatic embryogenesis is influenced by the genotype of the plant and the type of medium formulation [10]. Somatic embryogenesis is very sensitive to the culturing conditions for coffee, such as nutrient levels and the growth regulator hormone composition of the medium [22]. Moreover, there is still the obstacle of coffee genotype. To induce the embryogenic cells, the explant cultures are transferred to a differentiation medium containing growth regulator hormones such as 2,4-dicholorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), indole-3-butyric acid and anaphthaleneacetic acid combined with kinetin (KIN), and then they eventually develop into somatic embryos [23]. Söndhal and Sharp [15] obtained an embryogenic callus on a primary culture medium containing auxin for callus induction, followed by a second culture medium without auxin for embryo induction.
In recent years there have been reports of using blue-green algae as a tissue culture medium supplement. The effects of Spirulinaplatensis extract have been mentioned by many scientists. Amin et al. [24] studied the exchange of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and vitamins in culture media using an extract of S. platensis to propagate Sisymbrium irio callus. Moreover, the hexane extract of Spirulina maxima has been reported to increase the shoot length and seed germination, but to inhibit the root length slightly in both Vigna radiata and Oryza sativa var. Japonica [25]. The benefits of algae led the authors to study the extract from S. maxima in order to induce somatic embryogenesis via ISE of coffee plant.
The aim of this study is to determine the influence of the extract of S. maxima on ISE induction in Coffea arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963. The morphological characterisation of the embryogenic callus initiated from leaf sections is also studied.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Materials and Explant Preparation
The second leaves of 25 explants derived from the apices of 1-year-old coffee trees (Coffea arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963), which is a hybrid coffee tree obtained by crossing C. arabica cv. Caturra rojo with a hybrid of Timor (a natural cross of C. arabica x C. canephora) [26], were used for inducing and culturing the embryogenic callus. All explants from the basal part of the leaf were used to induce ISE. They were washed under running water for 5 min. Surface sterilisation was accomplished by soaking in 20% (v/v) commercial bleach (25% w/v NaOCl) solution with a few drops of Tween 80 for 5 min. with continuous agitation, followed by rinsing three times with sterile distilled water. After surface sterilisation, the margin and the midrib of each leaf were removed and the remaining leaf tissue was cut into 1-cm2 pieces to be used as explants.
Embryogenic Callus Induction
Freeze dried Spirulina maxima cells (3.5 g) were extracted by hexane (150 mL). Cell disruption was done using a homogeniser at 2000 rpm for 30 min. The slurry was shaken at 37°C for 2 hr. and then stored at 4°C for 12 hr. The slurry was then filtered through filter paper to give 150 mL of the aqueous spirulina extract (SPE). All explants were placed on the culture media consisting of Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [27] supplemented with different concentrations of SPE and combinations of 1 цМ 2,4-D and 5 цМ 6-benzlyaminopurine (BA). They were grown in Petri dishes with the abaxial side facing the medium. Seven treatments (A-G) were used (numbers in %)-A: 0 2,4-D, 0 BA, 0 SPE; B: 1 2,4-D, 0 BA, 0 SPE; C: 0 2,4-D, 5 BA, 0 SPE; D: 1 2,4-D, 5 BA, 0 SPE; E: 1 2,4-D, 5 BA, 3 SPE; F: 1 2,4-D, 5 BA, 4 SPE and G: 1 2,4-D, 5 BA, 5 SPE. All media were adjusted to pH 5.7-5.8 before autoclaving for 15 min. at 121°C. Petri dishes with 20 mL of culture media containing five explants and five replicates were used. The cultures were incubated in the dark at 25±2°C for 1 month. After that, the percentages of explants with calli and the numbers of calli per explant were recorded.
Indirect Somatic Embryogenesis (ISE)
The explants that produced calli were transferred to a Petri dish with fresh medium every month. Then they were incubated in the dark at 25±2°C. After 3 months of culture, the somatic embryo (SE) induction percentage (= [no. of SEs / total no. of 1-month-old calli]·100) per explant was recorded.
Regeneration of SEs
The globular and torpedo stages of SEs obtained in the experiments described above were transferred to the MS medium supplemented with 0.1 цМ BA. SEs were cultivated in the dark at 25±2°C in glass bottles closed with polyethylene food wrap.
Germination and Conversion of SEs into Plantlets
After 6 months 57 cotyledonary-stage embryos were cultured on the MS medium without PGRs. All cultures were maintained for 7 months at 25±2°C under a light intensity of 30 ^mol.m^.s"1 for a 16-hr photoperiod.
Statistical Analysis
The experiment was arranged in a completely randomised design with five replications. The statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA and the significant differences among treatment means were determined using Duncan's multiple range test at p< 0.05. The SPSS program [28] version 14.0 was used.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Cell Proliferation and Callus Induction
Cells at the incision site of each leaf explant started to proliferate after 2 weeks on the callus induction medium. This stage was characterised by small clumps of spherical and elongated cells (Figures 1A, 1B). The small clumps of spherical cells were embryogenic cells while the elongated cells were non-embryogenic cells. These results were supported by reports that embryogenic calli were composed of different types of cells, i.e. large elongated and smaller spherical cells [26, 29], while the non-embryogenic calli of the same age as the embryogenic calli were formed by loosely arranged large cells, usually elongated, with large vacuoles and thin walls [29]. Then they developed into the green friable and compact calli which were observed on the primary callus induction medium after 1 month (Figures 1C, 1D). The compact calli were characterised as non-embryogenic callus while the friable calli were embryogenic calli. Similarly, the compact non-embryogenic calli developed on the cut edge of the leaf and continuous growth was not observed [10]. The embryogenic calli of coffee were characterised by small clumps of densely cytoplasmic and spherical cells that were very friable [30].
Embryogenic Callus Induction
In treatments D, E, F and G (2,4-D, BA, and SPE), the calli were observed in the leaf sections. There was no callus in treatments A, B and C (control) (Table 1). The calli were observed in the MS medium supplemented with 2,4-D, BA and SPE. These results suggested that 1 цМ 2,4-D plus 5 цМ BA induced leaf cells of C. arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 to develop callus. Gatica et al. [31] reported that MS medium supplemented with 2,4-D and KIN induced embryogenic calli in C. arabica. Similarly, C. arabica cv. Catimor leaf that had been cultured on MS medium supplemented with 4.52 цM 2,4-D and 18.56 цM KIN produced embryogenic calli [32]. Thus, different combinations and concentrations of PGRs such as 2,4-D plus KIN or 2,4-D plus BA increase the preembryogenic calli due to alleviation of cell division to produce a pre-embryogenic mass [10]. Aga and Khillare [33] also reported that the leaf explants of C. arabica L. induced more callus on medium supplemented with 2,4-D in combination with BA. Thus, the 2,4-D in combination with BA was most useful for greater callus induction and proliferation compared to other auxm/cytokmm combinations in initiating callus formation.
Both compact and friable calli were observed after 1 month on the primary callus induction medium. The highest percentage of explants responding to the medium (92%) was obtained on leaf explants (19.78±10.86 clusters of callus/explant) cultured on MS medium supplemented with 1 цМ 2,4-D, 5 цМ BA and 3% SPE. Furthermore, 80% of leaf explants (42.20±10.82 clusters of callus/explant) produced significantly more calli when they were cultured on MS medium supplemented only with 1 цМ 2,4-D and 5 цМ BA. The addition of SPE had significant effects on callus induction, resulting in the reduction of number of callus per explant (Table 1). However, it was observed that treatment D (2,4-D and BA) produced compact rather than friable callus, while the addition of SPE in the MS medium improved friable callus induction (treatments E, F and G) (Table 1), probably due to the presence of various vitamins in SPE, including ß-carotene, inositol, riboflavin, thiamine, vitamin E and ascorbic acid [24]. Vitamins play a role as a cofactor involved in cell metabolism. Thus, the SPE extract might have affected the cell structure or cell organisation such as cytoplasmic viscosity and cell wall thickness. In general, embryogenic calli are friable and their cells are small, isodiametric, and arranged in clusters with a dense cytoplasm [34]. This would stimulate the cell to develop into an embryogenic cell and divide into friable callus.
At the end of the second month, the green embryogenic calli which were very friable turned yellowish and had a smooth surface (Figure 2A). Then abundant calli of white-beige colour differentiated into embryos after a little more than 3 months (Figure 2B). Our results corresponded with Ibrahim et al. [10] who reported that the yellow embryogenic calli of C. arabica var. Kartika changed to black brownish colour after 2 months. Then the 3-month-old calli appeared brown blackish and white in the pre-embryo stage. However, the compact non-embryogenic calli did not show continuous growth (Figure 2C). Non-responding explants were also observed as necrotic, brown friable calli (Figure 2D).
Types of Non-embryogenic Callus
The non-embryogenic callus of C. arabica cv. Catimor is characterised as friable with rough surface (Figure 3A) or creamy compact callus (Figure 3B), both being clearly distinguished. Friable, non-embryogenic callus with rough surface was also reported by Silva et al. [26], who observed that the callus was organised by isodiametric cells in a compact form which then developed into embryos, while the friable callus with rough surface was observed to be necrotic with brown characteristics. In addition, creamy compact calli involved in the DSE were observed when they were cultured on a medium containing triacontanol [17]. On the contrary, our results showed that all compact calli also had necrotic callus without continuous growth after 3 months of culture. These results suggest that the compact non-embryogenic calli which were cultured on the MS medium supplemented with 1 цМ 2,4-D, 5 цМ BA and SPE were involved in the ISE. Our result corresponds with that of Ibrahim et al. [10], who reported that the compact nodular non-embryogenic calli of C. arabica var. Kartika did not show continuous growth.
SE Induction
The number of SEs (22.86±14.23 embryos) per explant was highest when the callus was cultured by treatment D, followed by treatment E (12±4.18 embryos), F (11±3.65 embryos) and G (9±2.15 embryos). The presence of SPE significantly reduced the average number of SEs per explant. However, the highest percentage of SE induction (61%) was recorded in treatment E (1 цМ 2,4-D, 5 цМ BA, and 3% SPE) (Table 2). This experiment suggests that the interaction between SPE and 2,4D D BA has an effect on SE induction. Although fewer embryos were obtained, they induced the 1-month-old calli to convert into SEs more effectively and the 3% SPE concentration caused almost all calli to form SEs. Treatment D without SPE produced a greater percentage of 3-month-old callus than treatment E (Table 2) and also produced a higher number of 3-month-old calli (18.78±0.7 calli/explant) than the other treatments.
When tested to establish its effect on somatic embryogenesis, the SPE showed no significant difference among the different concentrations but did have a significant effect on the number of 3month-old calli per explant (Table 2). These calli of C. arabica entailed some risk of somaclonal variations via somatic embryogenesis. Thus, the 3-month-old calli might increase the frequency of variants due to the long callus culture period inducing aneuploidy (monosomy) during cell culture ageing [35]. The reduction of the culture duration may contribute to minimising the occurrence of somaclonal variants [36].
The culture medium composition has a considerable influence on the induction of cells of coffee to become a SE [37]. Auxin plays a role in the embryogenesis of coffee tissues via acidification of the cytoplasm and cell wall [38]. Thus, SPE containing, in particular, abundant indole acetic acid and various concentrations of gibrellin, benzyl adenine, abscisic acid, jasmonic acid and methyl jasmonate_[24] might influence the embryogenesis of coffee tissue. Consequently, treatment E (MS medium supplemented with 1 цМ 2,4-D, 5 цМ BA and 3% SPE) might induce most embryogenic calli to develop into SEs.
SE Development
In our study, embryos were produced by ISE from brown/beige calli after being grown on a regeneration medium for 3 months. All treatments produced compact, white embryos with a smooth surface comprised of individual or groups of SEs (Figure 4A). Moreover, a few roots were found to develop from calli in all treatments (Figure 4B). Our results showed that after 3-6 months of culturing SEs could be distinguished at different stages of development (globular, torpedo and cotyledonary stages) (Figures 4A-D). In coffee somatic embryogenesis usually takes several months (from leaf explant to SE)-7-8 months for C. canephora and 9-10 months for C. arabica [4]. Interestingly, SEs of C. arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 could be developed within 3 months in a single medium and showed a normal pattern of somatic embryogenesis following the report by Zimmerman [39].
Secondary Somatic Embryogenesis (SSE)
Cotyledonary-stage embryos were observed on the MS medium supplemented with 0.1 |iM BA after 6 months (Figure 4D). The MS medium solely supplemented with 0.1 цМ BA induced SEs into a cotyledonary stage because auxins were required for the proliferation of proembryogenic masses but the SE development was inhibited by auxin [37]. Then we transferred them to PGR-free MS medium. We found that some SEs germinated to produce translucent, white, secondary SEs at both the globular and torpedo stages which lacked a primordial root (Figures 5A-C). In this experiment, some SEs were able to germinate (Figure 5D). In C. arabica cv. Catimor, the secondary SEs develop directly by cell division at the epidermal and subepidermal levels in the hypocotyl of the primary SEs [26], while in Myrtus communis [40] and Solanum tuberosum [41], the secondary embryos can differentiate in different zones of the primary embryo, such as the base of the primary embryo hypocotyl and also in zones close to the root pole. This result suggests that the process of SSE in C. arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 occurs directly without callus formation. Similarly, the development of secondary SEs from the torpedo phase in Arabica coffee that occurred directly without callus induction produced some SEs on the media with 9.08 цМ thidiazuron [42]. Thus, the SSE is a useful process for regeneration of embryo cells under certain transformation methods as in the primary SE.
Germination of SE and Conversion into Plantlet
The white/beige, 6-month-old cotyledonary SEs changed to a green colour within 1 month (Figure 6A), produced shoots after 2 months (Figure 6B) and rooted within 3 months (Figure 6C). We found that 100% of the cotyledonary SEs of C. arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 germinated. They developed successfully into plantlets on the PGR-free MS medium used for embryo germination and converted into plantlets within 7 months (Figure 6D). The somatic embryogenesis of coffee plantlets usually takes several months-9 months for DSE and 12-13 months for ISE [43, 44]. In addition, the time taken to propagate plantlets via somatic embryogenesis (from leaf explant to SE) was 9-10 months in C. arabica [4, 45]. Similarly, the SEs of C. arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 developed into plantlets within 7 months, whereas cultured leaves of C. canephora accomplished this in 7-8 months [4]. We observed that approximately 26-28% of SEs developed into normal plantlets after 7 months. About two-thirds of the SEs lacked roots. It can be suggested that in the ISE process the origin of SE is unicellular or multicellular [46]. The results showed that some SEs which originated from the multicellular process lacked roots or shoots. Similar problems were reported to occur in C. arabica cultivars, Rubi, Catuaí Vermelho 81 and IAPAR 59, which showed one-third of SEs without roots or shoots [47]. Further research is needed to solve this problem.
CONCLUSIONS
Leaf explants of C. arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 are able to successfully produce SEs via ISE in a single culture medium, responding favourably to the SPE. The ratio and concentration of auxin (2,4-D) and cytokinin (BA) are critical for successful callus formation. In ISE the best result is obtained from solid MS medium supplemented with 1 цМ 2,4-D + 5 цМ BA + 3% (v/v) SPE. Clumps of these embryos germinate into plantlets and some embryos developed to secondary SEs on MS medium without PGRs. Using the extract of S. maxima appears to enhance SE induction for multiplication of C. arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963. This protocol is simple and reproducible for the mass micropropagation of coffee hybrids and might be useful for further development of the propagation of C. arabica hybrids using leaf explants. In addition to the ISE study, we have also established that SSE would be the most appropriate method for coffee improvement programs using genetic engineering.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by a grant from the Research Promotion and Technology Transfer Center (RPTTC) of the Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Thailand.
REFERENCES
1. P. Lashermes, M. -C. Combes, J. Robert, P. Trouslot, A. D'Hont, F. Anthony and A. Charrier, "Molecular characterisation and origin of the Coffea arabica L. genome", Mol. Gen. Genet., 1999, 261, 259-266.
2. P. Lashermes, S. Andrzejewski, B. Bertrand, M. C. Combes, S. Dussert, G. Graziosi, P. Trouslot and F. Anthony, "Molecular analysis of introgressive breeding in coffee (Coffea arabica L.)", Theor. Appl. Genet., 2000, 100, 139-146.
3. M. K. Mishra, S. Nishani and J. Jayarama, "Genetic relationship among indigenous coffee species from india using RAPD, ISSR and SRAP markers", Biharean Biol., 2011, 5, 17-24.
4. H. Etienne, "Somatic embryogenesis protocol: Coffee (Coffea arabica L. and C. canephora P)", in "Protocol for Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants" (Ed. S. M. Jain and P. K. Gupta), Springer, Dordrecht, 2005, Ch.14.
5. Office of agricultural economics, "Export statistics", 2018, http://www.impexp.oae.go.th/ service/export.php (Accessed: November 2019).
6. M. Hantawee, U. Noppakoonwong, S. Meesuk, P. Munsalung, K. Muangkompus, S. Chamchumroon, P. Naka and S. Lerdwatanakiat, "Hybrid arabica coffee varietal improvement: Catimor CIFC 7963-13-28", Thai Agric. Res. J., 2008, 26, 130-145.
7. C. de L. Santos-Briones and S. M. T. Hernández-Sotomayor, "Coffee biotechnology", Braz. J. Plant Physiol., 2006, 18, 217-227.
8. L. C. Monaco, M. R. Sondahl, A. Carvalho, O. J. Crocomo and W. R. Sharp, "Applications of tissue culture in the improvement of coffee", in "Applied and Fundamental Aspects of Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture" (Ed. J. Reinert and Y. P. S. Bajaj), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977, Ch. 6.
9. H. Etienne, E. Dechamp, D. B. Etienne and B. Bertrand, "Bioreactors in coffee micropropagation", Braz. J. Plant Physiol., 2006, 18, 45-54.
10. M. S. D. Ibrahim, R. S. Hartati, R. Rubiyo, A. Purwito and S. Sudarsono, "Direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis on arabica coffee (Coffea arabica)", Indones. J. Agric. Sci., 2013, 14, 79-86.
11. Y. Raghuramulu, M. S. Sreenivasan and P. K. Ramaiah, "Regeneration of coffee plantlets through tissue culture techniques in India", J. Coffee Res., 1989, 19, 30-38.
12. D. Pierre, "Techniques de reproduction végétative in vitro et amélioration génétique chez les cafeiers cultivés", Café Cacao Thé, 1984, 28, 231-244.
13. V. Kumar, M. M. Naidu and G. A. Ravishankar, "Developments in coffee biotechnology-in vitro plant propagation and crop improvement", Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 2006, 87, 49-65.
14. G. Staritsky, "Embryoid formation in callus cultures of coffee", Acta Bot. Neerl., 1970, 19, 509514.
15. M. R. Söndahl and W. R. Sharp, "High frequency induction of somatic embryos in cultured leaf explants of Coffea arabica L.", Z. Pflanzenphysiol., 1977, 81, 395-408.
16. B. Neuenschwander and T. W. Baumann, "A novel type of somatic embryogenesis in Coffea arabica", Plant Cell Rep., 1992, 10, 608-612.
17. A. M. Gatica, G. Arrieta and A. M. Espinoza, "Direct somatic embryogenesis in Coffea arabica L. cvs. Catura and Catuaí: Effect of triacontanol, light condition, and medium consistency", Agron. Costarricense, 2008, 32, 139-147.
18. V. M. Jiménez, "Regulation of in vitro somatic embryogenesis with emphasis on to the role of endogenous hormones", Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Veg., 2001, 13, 196-223.
19. D. M. Molina, M. E. Aponte, H. Cortina and G. Moreno, "The effect of genotype and explant age on somatic embryogenesis of coffee", Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 2002, 71, 117-123.
20. C. J. J. M. Raemakers, E. Jacobsen and R. G. F. Visser, "Secondary somatic embryogenesis and applications in plant breeding", Euphytica, 1995, 81, 93-107.
21. T. Nakamura, T. Taniguchi and E. Maeda, "Studies on somatic embryogenesis of coffee by scanning electron microscope", Jpn. J. Crop Sci., 1992, 61, 476-486.
22. G. Staristsky and G. A. M. van Hassel, "The synchronized mass propagation of Coffea canephora in vitro", Proceedings of 9th International Science Colloquium on Coffea, 1980, London, pp.597602.
23. P. Moens, "Développement de l'ovule et embryogenese chez Coffea canephora Pierre", La Cellule, 1965, 65, 129-147.
24. G. H. Amin, A. A. Al-Gendy, Y. M. El-Ayouty and A. Abdel-Motteleb, "Effect of Spirulina platensis extract on growth, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of Sisymbrium irio callus and cell suspension cultures", Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 2009, 3, 2097-2110.
25. P. Sornchai, N. Saithong, Y. Srichompoo, A. Unartngam and S. Iamtham, "Effect of Spirulina maxima aqueous extract on seed germination and seedling growth of mung bean, Vigna radiata and rice, Oryza sativa var. Japonica", J. Int. Soc. SE Asian Agric. Sci., 2014, 20, 77-84.
26. R. Fernández-Da Silva, L. Hermoso-Gallardo and A. Menéndez-Yuffá, "Primary and secondary somatic embryogenesis in leaf sections and cell suspensions of Coffea arabica cv. Catimor", Interciencia, 2005, 30, 694-698.
27. T. Murashige and F. Skoog, "A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures", Physiol. Plant., 1962, 15, 473-497.
28. R. J. Freund and W. J. Wilson, "Statistical Methods", 2nd Edn., Academic Press, London, 2003.
29. A. Menéndez-Yuffá and E. G. de García, "Morphogenic events during indirect somatic embryogenesis in coffee Catimor", Protoplasma, 1997, 199, 208-214.
30. M. Tahara, T. Yasuda, N. Uchida and T. Yamaguchi, "Formation of somatic embryos from protoplasts of Coffea arabica L.", Hortic. Sci., 1994, 29, 172-174.
31. A. M. Gatica, E. G. Arrieta and A. M. Espinoza, "Plant regeneration via indirect somatic embryogenesis and optimization of genetic transformation in Coffea arabica L. cvs. Caturra and Catuaí", Electron. J. Biotechnol., 2008, 11, 1-12.
32. E. de García and A. Menéndez, "Embriogénesis somática a partir de explantes foliares del cafeto Catimor", Café Cacao Thé, 1987, 31, 15-22.
33. E. Aga and Y. Khillare, "In vitro multiplication of Coffea arabica L. from leaf explants through indirect somatic embryogenesis", Int. J. Bot. Stud., 2017, 2, 17-22.
34. M. S. Pádua, L. V. Paiva, L. C. da Silva, K. G. do Livramento, E. Alves and A. H. F. Castro, "Morphological characteristics and cell viability of coffee plants calli", Cienc. Rural, 2014, 44, 660-665.
35. R. B. Landey, A. Cenci, R. Guyot, B. Bertrand, F. Georget, E. Dechamp, J. -C. Herrera, J. Aribi, P. Lashermes and H. Etienne, "Assessment of genetic and epigenetic changes during cell culture ageing and relations with somaclonal variation in Coffea arabică', Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 2015, 122, 517-531.
36. M. C. Simöes-Costa, E. Carapuça and I. R. Moura, "Somatic embryogenesis induction in different genotypes of Coffea spp.", Acta Hortic., 2009, 812, 295-300.
37. S. R. L. Fuentes, M. B. P. Calheiros, J. Manetti-Filho and L. G. E. Vieira, "The effects of silver nitrate and different carbohydrate sources on somatic embryogenesis in Coffea canephorď, Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 2000, 60, 5-13.
38. S. von Arnold, I. Sabala, P. Bozhkov, J. Dyachok and L. Filonova, "Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis", Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 2002, 69, 233-249.
39. J. L. Zimmerman, "Somatic embryogenesis: A model for early development in higher plants", Plant Cell, 1993, 5, 1411-1423.
40. J. M. Canhoto, M. L. Lopes and G. S. Cruz, "Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in myrtle (Myrtaceae)", Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 1999, 57, 13-21.
41. J. E. A. Seabrook and L. K. Douglass, "Somatic embryogenesis on various potato tissues from a range of genotypes and ploidy levels", Plant Cell Rep., 2001, 20, 175-182.
42. M. S. D. Ibrahim, R. R. S. Hartati, R. Rubiyo, A. Purwito and S. Sudarsono, "The induction of primary and secondary somatic embryogenesis for arabica coffee propagation", J. Tropic. Crop Sci., 2015, 2, 6-13.
43. J. -P. Ducos, E. Gibault, P. Broun and C. Lambot, "Coffee propagation by somatic embryogenesis at nestlé R&D center-tours", Proceedings of IUFRO Working Party 2.09.02 2011: Conference on "Advances in Somatic Embryogenesis of Trees and Its Application for the Future Forests and Plantations", 2010, Suwon, Republic of Korea, pp.68-73.
44. H. Etienne, B. Bertrand, A. Ribas, P. Lashermes, E. Malo, C. Montagnon, E. Alpizar, R. Bobadilla, J. Simpson, E. Dechamp, I. Jourdan and F. Georget, "Current applications of coffee (Coffea arabica) somatic embryogenesis for industrial propagation of elite heterozygous materials in central America and Maxico", Proceedings of IUFRO Working Party 2.09.02 2011: Conference on "Advances in Somatic Embryogenesis of Trees and Its Application for the Future Forests and Plantations", 2010, Suwon, Republic of Korea, pp.59-67.
45. J. van Boxtel and M. Berthouly, "High frequency somatic embryogenesis from coffee leaves: Factors influencing embryogenesis and subsequent proliferation and regeneration in liquid medium", Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 1996, 44, 7-17.
46. F. Quiroz-Figueroa, C. Fuentes-Cerda, R. Rojas-Herrera and V. Loyola-Vargas, "Histological studies on the developmental stages and differentiation of two different somatic embryogenesis systems of Coffea arabică', Plant Cell Rep., 2002, 20, 1141-1149.
47. L. P. B. Cid, A. R. R Cruz and L. H. R. Castro, "Somatic embryogenesis from three coffee cultivars: Rubi, Catuaí Vermelho 81, and IAPAR 59", Hortic. Sci., 2004, 39, 130-131.
© 2020 by Maejo University, San Sai, Chiang Mai, 50290 Thailand. Reproduction is permitted for noncommercial purposes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The influence of spirulina extract (SPE) in the process of somatic embryo (SE) induction of Coffea arabica cv. Catimor CIFC 7963 was studied. The explants of the second expanded leaves (2nd leaves) were cultured on solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1 µМ 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) + 5 µМ 6-benzlyaminopurine (BA). The SPE was varied in the following order: 0%, 3%, 4% and 5% (v/v). To determine the germination of SE, 6-month-old cotyledonary embryos were cultured on MS medium without plant growth regulators (PGRs). The results showed that cells of the 2nd leaves developed callus within 1 month. Some of the obtained calli developed into SEs on the same medium within 3 months. The maximum percentage of SE induction (61%) was obtained from the leaves cultured on MS medium supplemented with 3% SPE + 1 µМ 2,4-D + 5 µМ BA. The somatic embryos germinated to shoots and some germinated to secondary somatic embryos on PGR-free MS medium. After 7 months, approximately 26-28% of the somatic embryos had developed into normal plantlets. This protocol would be useful for SE induction and somaclonal variation reduction in hybrid coffee.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer