It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The period immediately after the offset of visual training is thought to be critical for memory consolidation. Nevertheless, we still lack direct evidence for the causal role of this period to perceptual learning of either previously or subsequently trained material. To address these issues, we had human subjects complete two consecutive trainings with different tasks (detecting different Gabor orientations). We applied continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to either the visual cortex or a control site (vertex) immediately after the offset of the first training. In the vertex cTBS condition, subjects showed improvement on the first task but not on the second task, suggesting the presence of anterograde interference. Critically, cTBS to the visual cortex abolished the performance improvement on the first task and released the second training from the anterograde interference. These results provide causal evidence for a role of the immediate post-training period in the consolidation of perceptual learning.
Ji Won Bang et al. test the importance of the immediate post-visual training period for memory consolidation in human subjects. They apply continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) directly following a learning task and show that this does affect memory consolidation, and that this effect relies on the visual cortex.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Sasaki Yuka 3 ; Watanabe, Takeo 3 ; Rahnev Dobromir 2
1 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943); New York University, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, New York, USA (GRID:grid.137628.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8753)
2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943)
3 Brown University, Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094)




