It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
External Occipital Protuberance (EOP) enlargement has been recently reported to increase in young adults, with a putative link with postural factors such as the use of smartphones. This study aims to analyze finely the changes in prevalence and size of EOP enlargement in millennials, throughout the smartphone era (2011 – 2019). Anonymized head Computerized Tomography (CT) examinations from patients aged 18-30 in 2011 (n = 205) or 2019 (n = 240), were reviewed to assess the type of EOP and to measure its volume in case of enlargement. Additional CT analyses were performed on two ancient skulls, from a XVIth century young male and a young female Egyptian mummy. There was no significant evolution in the prevalence of EOP enlargement between 2011 (92/205, 44.9%) and 2019 (106/240; 44.2%) (P = 0.92). There was no significant evolution either in the distribution of enlarged EOP volumes (P = 0.14) or of EOP types (P = 0.92) between 2011 and 2019. In the meantime, rates of smartphone ownership in millennials rose from 35% to 98%. Compared to 2019 volumes, the Egyptian mummy displayed an EOP enlargement corresponding to the 85th percentile for young women, and the XVIth century skull to the 73rd percentile for young men. In conclusion, on a population scale, prevalence and volume of enlarged EOP in millennials remain stable between 2011 and 2019, which makes the impact of rapidly growing modern environmental factors on EOP changes unlikely. EOP enlargement was also already present in ancient skulls from young individuals, with measurements within today’s upper ranges.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Badr Sammy 3
; Demondion Xavier 4 ; Cotten, Anne 1 1 CHU Lille, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Lille, France (GRID:grid.410463.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0471 8845); Univ. Lille, Lille School of Medicine, Lille, France (GRID:grid.503422.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 6780)
2 Univ. Lille, Lille School of Medicine, Lille, France (GRID:grid.503422.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 6780); CHU Lille, Department of Neuroradiology, Lille, France (GRID:grid.410463.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0471 8845)
3 CHU Lille, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Lille, France (GRID:grid.410463.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0471 8845)
4 CHU Lille, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Lille, France (GRID:grid.410463.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0471 8845); Univ. Lille, Lille School of Medicine, Lille, France (GRID:grid.503422.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 6780); Univ. Lille, Laboratory of Anatomy, Lille, France (GRID:grid.503422.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 6780)




