Abstract
Evolutionary processes, including selection, can be indirectly inferred based on patterns of genomic variation among contemporary populations or species. However, this often requires unrealistic assumptions of ancestral demography and selective regimes. Sequencing ancient DNA from temporally spaced samples can inform about past selection processes, as time series data allow direct quantification of population parameters collected before, during, and after genetic changes driven by selection. In this Comment and Opinion, we advocate for the inclusion of temporal sampling and the generation of paleogenomic datasets in evolutionary biology, and highlight some of the recent advances that have yet to be broadly applied by evolutionary biologists. In doing so, we consider the expected signatures of balancing, purifying, and positive selection in time series data, and detail how this can advance our understanding of the chronology and tempo of genomic change driven by selection. However, we also recognize the limitations of such data, which can suffer from postmortem damage, fragmentation, low coverage, and typically low sample size. We therefore highlight the many assumptions and considerations associated with analyzing paleogenomic data and the assumptions associated with analytical methods.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; María C. Ávila‐Arcos 2 ; David Díez‐del‐Molino 3 ; Fumagalli, Matteo 4 ; Guschanski, Katerina 5 ; Lorenzen, Eline D 6 ; Anna‐Sapfo Malaspinas 7 ; Tomas Marques‐Bonet 8 ; Martin, Michael D 9 ; Murray, Gemma G R 10
; Papadopulos, Alexander S T 11 ; Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard 12 ; Wegmann, Daniel 13 ; Love Dalén 14 ; Foote, Andrew D 11 1 Centre for Palaeogenetics, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
2 International Laboratory for Human Genome Research (LIIGH), UNAM Juriquilla, Queretaro, Mexico
3 Centre for Palaeogenetics, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
4 Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom
5 Animal Ecology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
6 Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
7 Department of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
8 Institut de Biologia Evolutiva, (CSIC‐Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Centre for Genomic Analysis—Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain; Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain; Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
9 Department of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
10 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
11 Molecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
12 Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
13 Department of Biology, Université de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Fribourg, Switzerland
14 Centre for Palaeogenetics, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden





