It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Yield losses caused by fungal pathogens represent a major threat to global food production. One of the most devastating fungal wheat pathogens is Zymoseptoria tritici. Despite the importance of this fungus, the underlying mechanisms of plant–pathogen interactions are poorly understood. Here we present a conceptual framework based on coinfection assays, comparative metabolomics, and microbiome profiling to study the interaction of Z. tritici in susceptible and resistant wheat. We demonstrate that Z. tritici suppresses the production of immune-related metabolites in a susceptible cultivar. Remarkably, this fungus-induced immune suppression spreads within the leaf and even to other leaves, a phenomenon that we term “systemic induced susceptibility”. Using a comparative metabolomics approach, we identify defense-related biosynthetic pathways that are suppressed and induced in susceptible and resistant cultivars, respectively. We show that these fungus-induced changes correlate with changes in the wheat leaf microbiome. Our findings suggest that immune suppression by this hemibiotrophic pathogen impacts specialized plant metabolism, alters its associated microbial communities, and renders wheat vulnerable to further infections.
The fungal plant pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici is a major threat to wheat yield. Here Seybold et al. show that Z. tritici can suppress immune responses not only in infected tissue but also on other leaves, a phenomenon termed “systemic induced susceptibility” that is correlated with systemic changes in metabolite accumulation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Kiel University, Botanical Institute, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.9764.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9986); Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany (GRID:grid.419520.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2222 4708); The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel (GRID:grid.9619.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0538)
2 Kiel University, Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.9764.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9986)
3 Kiel University, Botanical Institute, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.9764.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9986); Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany (GRID:grid.419520.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2222 4708)
4 Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Campus Kiel, Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.419520.b)
5 Kiel University, Botanical Institute, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.9764.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9986); Kiel University, Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.9764.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9986)
6 Kiel University, Botanical Institute, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.9764.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9986)
7 Kiel University, Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.9764.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9986)