It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This article reports the results of a mixed-methods study of the perceptions of a selected group of experienced teachers of English as a foreign language of the challenges and potentials of using various cooperative learning methods in the context of achieving the communicative and social goals of a modern theme-based curriculum. Participants (N = 18) took part in a three-day refresher in-service program, during which they completed a semantic differential scale and kept journals to record their perceptions of the congruence, cost, difficulty, and importance, as well as to express their views regarding the challenges and potentials of using cooperative learning in their respective classrooms. Results revealed that the participants tended to perceive the more concrete Jigsaw cooperative learning methods and the cooperative learning Structural approach to be more congruent to their practices, less costly, and easier to implement; although equally important, to the more conceptual methods of Group investigation, Learning together, and Creative controversy. Likewise, the study showed that all cooperative learning methods and strategies are valued, despite implementation challenges related to teacher knowledge, proper implementation, curriculum alignment and crowdedness, time on task, and school policy.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





