It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Risk-Based Predictive Stability (RBPS) tools, such as the Accelerated Stability Assessment Program (ASAP) and other models, are used routinely within pharmaceutical development to quickly assess stability characteristics, especially to understand mechanisms of degradation. These modeling tools provide stability insights within weeks that could take months or years to understand using long-term stability conditions only. Despite their usefulness, the knowledge gained through these tools are not as broadly used to support regulatory filing strategies. This paper aims to communicate how industry has used RBPS data to support regulatory submissions and discuss the regulatory feedback that was received.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Pfizer Inc., Groton, USA (GRID:grid.410513.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8800 7493)
2 AstraZeneca, Cheshire, UK (GRID:grid.417815.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 5929 4381)
3 Janssen Pharmaceutica R&D, a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium (GRID:grid.419619.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0623 0341)
4 Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Marlborough, USA (GRID:grid.419756.8)
5 Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, USA (GRID:grid.418412.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1312 9717)
6 Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, USA (GRID:grid.417993.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2260 0793)
7 Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.422219.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0384 7506)
8 Genentech, South San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.418158.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0534 4718)
9 Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, USA (GRID:grid.417540.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 2220 2544)
10 Biogen, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.417832.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0384 8146)