It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The webbed feet of waterbirds are morphologically diverse and classified into four types: the palmate foot, semipalmate foot, totipalmate foot, and lobate foot. To understand the developmental mechanisms underlying this morphological diversity, we conducted a series of comparative analyses. Ancestral state reconstruction based on phylogeny assumed that the lobate feet possessed by the common coot and little grebe arose independently, perhaps through distinct developmental mechanisms. Gremlin1, which encodes a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonist and inhibits interdigital cell death (ICD) in the foot plate of avian embryos, remained expressed in the interdigital tissues of webbed feet in the duck, common coot, little grebe, and great cormorant. Differences in Gremlin1 expression pattern and proliferating cell distribution pattern in the toe tissues of the common coot and little grebe support the convergent evolution of lobate feet. In the totipalmate-footed great cormorant, Gremlin1 was expressed in all interdigital tissues at St. 31, but its expression disappeared except along the toes by St. 33. The webbing of the cormorant’s totipalmate foot and duck’s palmate foot may have risen from distinct developmental mechanisms.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Faculty of Science, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Department of Biology, Chiba, Japan (GRID:grid.265050.4) (ISNI:0000 0000 9290 9879)
2 Faculty of Science, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Department of Biology, Chiba, Japan (GRID:grid.265050.4) (ISNI:0000 0000 9290 9879); SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), 10–3 Midori-machi, Department of Polar Science, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.275033.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1763 208X)
3 Faculty of Science, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Department of Biology, Chiba, Japan (GRID:grid.265050.4) (ISNI:0000 0000 9290 9879); Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Fukui Prefectural University, 4–1–1 Kenjojima, Matsuoka, Fukui, Japan (GRID:grid.411756.0)




