It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
From the United States’ failing infrastructure to the Boeing 737 MAX 8 grounding, the need for strong leadership from the engineering community is clear. This fact is acknowledged by various entities like professional organizations, the National Academy of Engineers, and more recently, by the engineering accrediting body, ABET. This study aims to explore the leadership attitudes of engineering students in their final year at one large, public institution.
The first study focuses on student engagement among graduating undergraduates from all engineering accredited majors. The results show various activities are linked to stronger leadership skill assurance: work off-campus, serving as a leader in a non-engineering student group, positive faculty and peer interactions, and curricular influences like engineering management courses and a capstone design course that students feel prepares them for their career.
The second study explores leadership development of students in a civil engineering capstone design course with a focus on the differentiation between self, peer, and instructor ratings for students among specific demographic groups. Key insights drawn from this study include that peer and instructor ratings trended together, supporting the idea that external rater feedback is valuable. Additionally, there was evidence of negative bias in the peer ratings for underrepresented minority students and the instructor ratings for international students.
The third study explores leadership development of students in a mechanical engineering capstone design course with a focus on the evolution of their leadership behaviors at three timepoints during the year-long class. Students self-reported higher leadership scores at the end of the class, even with minimal instruction that framed course activities as leadership. Female students’ leadership scores started high and remained high, while scores for men increased from beginning to end. Students with high, well-rounded leadership scores were lower at the end of the class while students who started with low scores increased consistently through the course.
This series of studies details how engineering students nearing graduation view their leadership skills as they work in a team of their peers. Furthermore, these insights are valuable to educators as they implement the common methods of assessing leadership exemplified in this research.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer






