Introduction
Flooding is a re-occurring hydrological phenomenon that often does not affect a single catchment but rather goes beyond catchment boundaries resulting in a regional hazard that transects political boundaries. Over the last decades, there has been an apparent perception that the amount, magnitude and frequency of floods in Europe has been changing. However, catchment or regionally based analyses of these variables in the scientific literature have shown little consistency on whether floods have increased or decreased in Europe (Hall et al., 2014). Therefore, to further scientifically investigate this matter, new insights into floods in general, flood generating processes and their associated changes are needed.
Resulting from the wide spatial context in which floods generally occur, a better understanding can be gained by analysing observed floods in both regionally extended and longer-term contexts. For example, Europe has several hydro-climatologic distinct sub-regions, which offer a unique set of large-scale study areas in which observed floods can be compared and analysed.
To improve our understanding of flood processes and associated changes in flood regimes at a European scale, a single extensive large scale database is essential (Hall et al., 2014), as currently this data is dispersed in various national and international data sources, some of which are only recorded on paper. Under the umbrella of the European Research Council (ERC) project “Deciphering River Flood Change” (FloodChange), a joint European flood change research network has being established.
Within the network, the time series of the European Flood Database were obtained from different national data sources in a collaborative effort of a joint European flood research agreement based on the exchange of data, models and expertise, and from existing international data collections and open source websites. In the course of developing this database, an attempt is being made to bring all these different data sources together, and to merge the different formats of existing or new (not yet digitised) data sources into a comprehensive European Flood Database. These ongoing efforts in building the database are a key building block and cross-border research collaborations are contributing to advancing the understanding of regional flood processes beyond individual country boundaries and to making flood research more coherent in Europe.
In the following sections, a detailed account of the current state, spatial and temporal coverage of the preliminary state of European Flood Database (as of January 2015), is presented together with a summary and outlook on the still ongoing work on the database.
European Flood Database composed of different national and international data sources. Within the same country different regional data sources are shown under the same combined national label.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Data sources of the European Flood Database
The raw hydrological data that has been compiled and transformed with the aim to be merged into the European Flood Database has been supplied by many different individual, national, and already existing international data sources. The database comprises of time series from either daily mean discharges, annual maximum peak discharges or both variables, depending on data availability or current data distribution/sharing policies in place. For few countries that are included in the database, only water levels time series are available, though no discharges. Although these data are not directly comparable with discharge, water level series were included into database to supplement the temporal and spatial coverage of the data.
In Fig. 1, the current database national coverage and data source labels of already existing international collections are depicted, together with the detailed data source information (Table 1). For some countries such as Germany or Italy, where the hydrological data is not centrally collected and archived, several different regional data sources exist and were depicted with the same combined national label. It has to be noted that for most countries, only a selection of the countries' available gauging stations has been shared by the data holders. Therefore, the spatial and temporal coverage within the database does not correspond to the entire national observational networks.
Flood Database characteristics
All the series that are integrated into the database are checked for consistency for both the actual flood data and their metadata (Station Name, River/Stream, Station elevation, and Catchment Area). If problematic or incorrect information is detected, data providers are involved whenever possible to correct the data appropriately. Additionally, as the hydrological series stem from different sources, some stations have duplicated entries in the database (e.g. one from an international data source and a regional source). Currently there is still extensive work being done in identifying such duplicates and, if the data quality permits, in merging/amending the time series and the associated metadata.
Number of stations per country.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
To date (January 2015), the preliminary database comprises over 7000 hydrometric stations of various data series length, with more than 60 % of the stations spanning over more than 40 years. The database is still expanding through new data series, even through digitalisation of new series or through completing current already existing time series with data from different data sources.
Spatial coverage
The aim of the database is to obtain a homogenous flood database across Europe. In practical terms however, depending on data availability and country size, different countries and regions in Europe differ in the number of stations in the database (Fig. 2) and their station density (see also Fig. 1).
If the spatial coverage of the stations is examined together with other station attributes such as catchment elevation (Fig. 3) and catchment area (Fig. 4), it becomes apparent that not only the spatial density across Europe is highly variably but also the other spatial characteristics. For example, higher elevated stations such as the Alps or the Pyrenees are well covered, whereas the Carpathians, the Kjolen and the Balkan Mountains show a lower density. Central Europe exhibit a better coverage for lower lying stations and for larger catchment areas, compared to for example Eastern Europe. Although the station characteristics are diverse, the extended spatial coverage will allow for advancing the understanding of regional flood processes beyond individual country boundaries.
Data sources of the European Flood Research Database.
Abbreviation | Country/project | Data holder/source/project information |
---|---|---|
full name | ||
AL | Albania | National Hydro-Meteorological Service Albania, (IGEWE) |
AU | Austria | Hydrographic Services of Austria |
BG | Bulgaria | Hydrological Yearbooks of the Rivers in Bulgaria |
BiH | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Hydrological Yearbooks of the former Republic of Yugoslavia |
CH | Switzerland | Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)/(BAFU) |
CZ | Czech Republic | Czech Hydrometeorological Institute |
DE | Germany | Wasser- und Schifffahrtsverwaltung des Bundes (WSV) |
DE | Germany, Brandenburg | Landesamt für Umwelt, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz, Brandenburg |
DE | Germany, Baden-Württemberg | Landesanstalt fuer Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg (LUBW) |
DE | Germany, Bavaria | Flood Information Centre, Bavarian Environment Agency, Munich |
DE | Germany, Hessen | Landesamtes für Umwelt und Geologie, Hessen |
DE | Germany, Lower Saxony | Landesamt Niedersachsen |
DE | Germany, Mecklenburg-Western | Landesamt für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Geologie, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern |
Pomerania | ||
DE | Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia | Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, Nordrhein Westfalen |
DE | Germany, Rhineland-Palatinate | Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht Rheinland-Pfalz |
DE | Germany, Saarland | Landesamt für Umwelt- und Arbeitsschutz, Saarland |
DE | Germany, Saxony | Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (LfULG), Sachsen |
DE | Germany, Saxony-Anhalt | Landesbetrieb für Hochwasserschutz und Wasserwirtschaft, Sachsen-Anhalt |
DE | Germany, Schleswig-Holstein | Landesbetrieb für Küstenschutz, Nationalpark und Meeresschutz, Schleswig-Holstein |
DE | Germany, Thuringia | Landesanstalt für Umwelt und Geologie, Thüringen |
DK | Denmark | Danish Centre for Environment and Energy (DCE) |
EE | Estonia | Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (EMHI) |
EL | Greece | National Data Bank of Hydrological & Meteorological Information (NDBHMI) |
ES | Spain | Centre for Hydrographic Studies (Centro de Estudios Hidrograficos) of CEDEX, Spain |
EWA | EWA | European Water Archive (EWA) |
F | France | Banque Hydro France, Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy |
FI | Finland | Finnish Environment Institute OIVA – the environmental and geographical information |
service for experts | ||
GRDC | GRDC | The Global Runoff Data Centre, Koblenz, Germany |
HU | Hungary | Hungarian Water District Directorates |
HR | Croatia | Meteorological and Hydrological Service, Zagreb, Croatia |
HYDRATE | HYDRATE | Project: Hydrometeorological Data Resources and Technology for Effective Flash |
Flood Forecasting (HYDRATE) | ||
IE | Ireland | Irish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Office of Public Works (OPW) |
IS | Iceland | Icelandic Meteorological Office, Hydrological Database, No. 2013-10-27/01 |
IT | Italy | SIMN (Servizio Idrografico e Mareografico Nazionale) |
IT | Italy | ENEL (Ente Nazionale per l'energia ELettrica) |
IT | Italy | AdBPo (Autorità di Bacino del Fiume Po) |
Continued.
Abbreviation | Country/project | Data holder/source/project information |
---|---|---|
full name | ||
IT | Italy | IRPI (Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogeologica) |
IT | Italy, South Tyrol Region | Hydrographisches Amt Bozen |
IT | Italy, Piedmont Region | ARPA (Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell' Ambiente) Piemonte |
IT | Italy, Veneto Region | ARPA (Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell' Ambiente) Veneto |
IT | Italy, Emilia-Romagna Region | ARPA (Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell' Ambiente) Emilia–Romagna |
IT | Italy, Sicily Region | Osservatorio delle Acque della Regione Siciliana |
IT | Italy, Trentino Region | Dipartimento Protezione Civile, Provincia Autonoma di Trento |
LT | Lithuania | Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service |
MK | Macedonia | National Hydrometeorological Service, Republic of Macedonia |
NL | Netherlands | Rijkswaterstaat – Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment |
NO | Norway | Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) |
PL | Poland | Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Poland |
PT | Portugal | National Information System for Water Resources of Portugal (SNIRH) |
SE | Sweden | Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) |
SI | Slovenia | Slovenian Environment Agency (ARSO) |
SK | Slovakia | Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ) |
TR | Turkey | General Directorate of Electrical Power Resources Survey and Development |
Administration (EIE), Turkey | ||
UA | Ukraine | Hydrological Department of the Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute (UHMI) |
UK | United Kingdom | UK National River Flow Archive (NRFA) |
Station altitude [m.s.l.].
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Catchment area [km].
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Record length in years of annual maximum flow series.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
First year of record of the annual maximum series.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Last year of record of the annual maximum series.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Temporal coverage
The spatial coverage of the preliminary database can be considered satisfactory for investigating changes in floods and the associated flood generating processes. However, the temporal coverage of the database shows a more inhomogeneous appearance for some regions. These inhomogeneities become particularly evident when analysing the annual maximum flow series, either the actual peak flow series or derived from daily mean discharges (Fig. 5).
Several reasons for the differences in record length exist. The most important is for historical reasons with station records in different regions across Europe commencing in different periods (Fig. 6). Second, the availability of the most recent or updated series also plays an important role (Fig. 7). Particularly data that has been acquired from already existing international data sources (such as the EWA in Eastern Europe) exhibit short record lengths, due to difficulties in obtaining updated national data beyond the end of already existing series. In addition, it is difficult to obtain updated time series after 1970 in Italy, when the last national publication of annual maximum series was published and after institutional changes occurred, resulting in the national hydrological service being split into several regional services.
Summary and outlook
The preliminary state of the European Flood Database (January 2015) has been presented. The database will be further developed and the associated research questions will be approached through further collaborations and research agreements based on the exchange of data, models, staff, and expertise. The current direction of further database development aims to increase the temporal coverage so that the satisfactory spatial coverage can be maintained across all time periods. This includes a focus on the last 40–50 years to allow for a better understanding of whether floods in Europe have been changing and if so when, where and how the changes have occurred.
A key element of the database that needs to be expanded over the course of database development is information associated with the degree of human modifications on the river system related to the station and therefore the time series. Currently, little metadata on this is in the database, but when data providers with detailed regional knowledge were involved in obtaining the time series, one of the requisites was to have low human influence present in the time series. This pre-requisite could not be achieved for some regions due to the high degree of modification of the catchments. Ultimately, when analyses on the database are performed, local knowledge on rivers and the degree of human influence are important and will be considered through the contributions of the established network.
The database development is still ongoing; therefore, researchers and data providers interested to join the European flood change research network are welcome. Generally, due to legal restrictions and economic concerns, various agreements with the data providers have to be signed, before data can be incorporated into the database. Depending on these agreements, the use of the time series is restricted to the FloodChange Project or the data can be used for joint research within the network. Due to these legal restrictions, the database cannot be made freely available and is only accessible for partners involved in the research network. The final large-scale database will be used for joint research to improve our understanding of flood processes and associated changes in flood regimes at a European scale. Once European wide patterns of change have been identified, the acquired understanding of the drivers will facilitate an improved understanding of possible future flood regime changes.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all those involved in the data collection, preparation and screening for their collaborative efforts and we would also like to thank the data providers for sharing the discharge series. This research was supported by the ERC Advanced Grant “FloodChange”, Project No. 291152. We also acknowledge the WMO Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC), and the UNESCO Flow Regimes from International Experimental and Network Data (FRIEND) European Water Archive (EWA). The present work was partially developed within the framework of the “Panta Rhei” Research Initiative of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS). The authors also acknowledge the involvement in the data screening process of C. Álvaro Díaz and M. Kupfersberger during their internships, as well as E. Diamantini, S. Mallucci and K. Jeneiova, during their stay at the Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, Vienna University of Technology, for their Master theses and parts of the PhD research, respectively.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The current work addresses one of the key building blocks towards an improved understanding of flood processes and associated changes in flood characteristics and regimes in Europe: the development of a comprehensive, extensive European flood database. The presented work results from ongoing cross-border research collaborations initiated with data collection and joint interpretation in mind. A detailed account of the current state, characteristics and spatial and temporal coverage of the European Flood Database, is presented.
At this stage, the hydrological data collection is still growing and consists at this time of annual maximum and daily mean discharge series, from over 7000 hydrometric stations of various data series lengths. Moreover, the database currently comprises data from over 50 different data sources. The time series have been obtained from different national and regional data sources in a collaborative effort of a joint European flood research agreement based on the exchange of data, models and expertise, and from existing international data collections and open source websites. These ongoing efforts are contributing to advancing the understanding of regional flood processes beyond individual country boundaries and to a more coherent flood research in Europe.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





















1 Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
2 Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden
3 Department of Civil, Informatics, Architectural, Environmental Engineering and Applied Mathematics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
4 CSE – Control Systems Engineer, Renewable Energy Systems & Technology, Tirana, Albania
5 Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Prague, Czech Republic
6 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, Split University, Split, Croatia
7 Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
8 Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
9 Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering (DICAM), Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
10 Department of Agriculture, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
11 Department Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering (DIATI), Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
12 Lower Tisza District Water Directorate, Szeged, Hungary
13 Department Hydrological Research, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute, Kiev, Ukraine
14 Department of Civil Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
15 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK
16 Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK
17 Department of Land and Water Resources Management (Faculty of Civil Engineering), Slovak University of Technology Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
18 Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland
19 Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Institute of Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
20 University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Sofia, Bulgaria
21 Department of Civil Engineering: Hydraulic, Energy and Environment, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
22 Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
23 Department for Catchment Hydrology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Halle, Germany
24 Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Hydrology and Hydrodynamics, Warsaw, Poland
25 Institute of Geography, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
26 Irstea, UR HHLY, Hydrology-Hydraulics Research Unit, Lyon, France
27 Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
28 Department of Engineering, University Roma Tre, Rome, Italy
29 Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, Oslo, Norway
30 Institute of GeoSciences, Energy, Water and Environment (IGEWE), Polytechnic University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania