It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The FDA-approved DNA hypomethylating agents (DHAs) like 5-azacytidine (5AC) and decitabine (DAC) demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Despite previous reports that showed histone acetylation changes upon using these agents, the exact mechanism underpinning these changes is unknown. In this study, we investigated the relative potency of the nucleoside analogs and non-nucleoside analogs DHAs on DNA methylation reversal using DNA pyrosequencing. Additionally, we screened their effect on the enzymatic activity of the histone deacetylase sirtuin family (SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT3, SIRT5 and SIRT6) using both recombinant enzymes and nuclear lysates from leukemia cells. The nucleoside analogs (DAC, 5AC and zebularine) were the most potent DHAs and increased the enzymatic activity of SIRT6 without showing any significant increase in other sirtuin isoforms. ChIP-Seq analysis of bone marrow cells derived from six acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and treated with the nucleoside analog DAC induced genome-wide acetylation changes in H3K9, the physiological substrate for SIRT6. Data pooling from the six patients showed significant acetylation changes in 187 gene loci at different chromosomal regions including promoters, coding exons, introns and distal intergenic regions. Signaling pathway analysis showed that H3K9 acetylation changes are linked to AML-relevant signaling pathways like EGF/EGFR and Wnt/Hedgehog/Notch. To our knowledge, this is the first report to identify the nucleoside analogs DHAs as activators of SIRT6. Our findings provide a rationale against the combination of the nucleoside analogs DHAs with SIRT6 inhibitors or chemotherapeutic agents in AML due to the role of SIRT6 in maintaining genome integrity and DNA repair.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, USA (GRID:grid.239578.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0675 4725)
2 West Virginia State University, Department of Biology, Institute, USA (GRID:grid.427308.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2374 5599)
3 Albany College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Colchester, USA (GRID:grid.413555.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 8718 587X); Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Richmond, USA (GRID:grid.224260.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0458 8737)
4 University of Charleston, Department of Pharmaceutical & Administrative Sciences, Charleston, USA (GRID:grid.413084.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 9430 6326)
5 Marshall University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Huntington, USA (GRID:grid.259676.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2214 9920)
6 Texas A&M University, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kingsville, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)
7 University of Vermont, Department of Neurological Sciences, Burlington, USA (GRID:grid.59062.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7689)