OBSERVATION
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that 20% of antibiotic-resistant infections in the United States are attributable to agricultural use of antibiotics (1–3). The majority of antibacterial agents (including ionophores) purchased in the United States have been for use in agricultural settings (15.4 million kg, or 80% of the U.S. annual total in 2014) (1, 4). The use of such agents causes selective pressure, favoring the survival of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the spread of resistance-conferring genes among livestock (5).
Most of the scientific focus on antibiotic resistance in agriculture has been on livestock and meat products (6–9). However, the plant phyllosphere (leaf surface) and rhizosphere (root system) serve as habitats for environmental microbiota and as hosts of pathogenic plant and animal bacteria (10).
Horizontal transfer of genetic information has been well studied for transfer of genes between pathogenic bacteria and within environmental communities as well (16). A thorough review of resistant plasmid characteristics within Enterobacteriaceae has recently been published by Partridge et al. (17). However, the transfer of genes from nonpathogenic to pathogenic bacteria deserves more attention (12, 18). We hypothesize that environmental bacteria that colonize produce may serve as platforms for the persistence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and for the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes to the mammalian gut microbiome.
In vitro transfer of antibiotic resistance genes.
We tested whether transfer of an antibiotic resistance gene could be observed in vitro from the
TABLE 1
In vitro and in planta lettuce coculture with AbzeoR
Condition | ESBLa | Avg frequency of dual resistance | PCR confirmation | |
---|---|---|---|---|
In vitro + broth | DH5αC | N | 1.45E−05 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | JJ2528 | Y | 1.67E−06 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | 267-18-50927 | Y | 3.53E−07 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | 330-18-62584 | Y | 2.83E−07 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | 56428 | Y | 1.24E−01 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | 56307C | N | 1.12E−06 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | 56459C | N | 4.91E−07 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | 56303C | N | 8.04E−07 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | 56663C | N | 2.68E−07 | Positive |
In vitro + broth | JJ1886 | Y | 9.85E−07 | Negative |
In vitro + broth | JJ2555 | Y | 7.17E−07 | Negative |
In vitro + broth | 267-19-46076 | Y | 8.92E−02 | Negative |
In vitro + broth | 267-19-44723 | Y | 8.04E−07 | Negative |
In vitro + agar | JJ2528 | Y | 3.54E−05 | Positive |
In vitro + agar | 56428 | Y | 5.88E−01 | Positive |
In vitro + agar | 56307C | N | 7.44E−05 | Positive |
In vitro + agar | 56663C | N | 1.14E−05 | Negative |
In planta + sterile | JJ2528 | Y | 8.78E−07 | Positive |
In planta + sterile | 56428 | Y | 3.38E−04 | Negative |
In planta + sterile | 56307C | N | 2.61E−08 | Negative |
In planta + sterile | 56663C | N | 1.01E−07 | Positive |
In planta + nonsterile | JJ2528 | Y | 1.61E−05 | Positive |
In planta + nonsterile | JJ1886 | Y | 6.58E−09 | Positive |
In planta + nonsterile | 56428 | Y | 0 | Not applicable |
In planta + nonsterile | 56307C | N | 0 | Not applicable |
In planta + nonsterile | 56663C | N | 0 | Not applicable |
a
N, no; Y, yes.
Of the positive PCR confirmed strains, the 2 ESBL-producing and 2 non-ESBL-producing strains with the highest frequencies of dual resistance in broth were selected for in vitro agar cocultures. Frequencies of dual antibiotic resistance in agar cocultures were documented (Table 1) for the 3 confirmed transformant strains, JJ2528zeoR, 56428zeoR, and 56307CzeoR (Fig. S1B). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequencies of dual resistance in liquid-broth versus solid-agar cocultures between the 4 candidate strains (Mann-Whitney test, P > 0.05). Thus, the 2 ESBL-producing and 2 non-ESBL-producing strains with the highest frequencies of dual resistance in broth coculture were also selected for in planta horizontal gene transfer studies.
In planta transfer of antibiotic resistance genes.
In order to confirm that our model was applicable to the transmission of antibiotic resistance genes on produce, we tested whether horizontal gene transfer could take place on the surface of sterile and nonsterile lettuce leaf discs. Frequencies of dual resistance from coculture on lettuce were generally lower than the results from in vitro conditions (Table 1). Strains 56428 and 56307C were confirmed for plasmid uptake in vitro but not in planta, suggesting that the frequency of plasmid transfer events is negatively affected by the nutrient-depleted leaf surface (Table 1 and Fig. S1). However, 56663C had similar frequencies of dual antibiotic resistance in broth and on sterile lettuce tissue but no plasmid transmission on agar and nonsterile lettuce. To test if the absence of plasmid transfer in vitro correlated with an absence of plasmid transfer in planta, we tested JJ1886 on nonsterile lettuce as well to model environmental transmission. Surprisingly, JJ1886 demonstrated plasmid uptake on nonsterile lettuce despite demonstrating no in vitro broth plasmid transmission (Table 1 and Fig. S2B). JJ2528 demonstrated successful transformation in all in vitro and in planta conditions (Table 1, Fig. S1A and B, and Fig. S2A and B). Thus, transformant JJ2528zeoR was selected for the in vivo model system. No statistically significant difference was found between the in planta frequencies of dual resistance of ESBL- and non-ESBL-producing strains on sterile and nonsterile lettuce (Mann-Whitney tests, P > 0.05).
In vivo colonization of mice by transformant
We then sought to determine whether transformant
FIG 1
In vivo colonization of transformed
We found that the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes can occur between bacterial colonizers of plants and the mammalian gut microbiome via ingestion, during the course of antibiotic treatment. These results highlight the potential contribution of plant foods to the spread of antibiotic resistance. This potential is underscored by the estimated 258.2 million patients prescribed oral antibiotics every year in the United States alone, which could exacerbate the risk of harboring antibiotic resistance genes from bacteria acquired via produce (19).
We showed that the majority of the pathogenic
While pMU125_zeoR is a laboratory plasmid, we selected it due to the absence of zeocin resistance in the candidate recipient strains and the low frequency of preexisting zeocin resistance in the mouse gut. We have thus established a novel system using AbzeoR to demonstrate horizontal gene transfer on leaf tissue. An important next step would be to apply this model to naturally occurring plasmids.
In conclusion, while most One Health attention has been on the potential for antibiotic resistance transmission from livestock and contaminated meat products to people, plant foods are fundamental to the food chain for meat eaters and vegetarians alike. Further research into the transmission of antibiotic resistance from plant foods to mammals is needed.
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. The recipient
Construction of the
pMU125 is a broad-host-range shuttle vector. pMU125 is a low-copy-number plasmid in
Detection of plasmid transfer.
Recipient monococultures were plated on doubly selective EMB agar plates (100 μg/ml CIP plus 25 μg/ml ZEO) for 48 h at 37°C to account for spontaneous mutants. Coculture CFU that grew on doubly selective plates were indicative of plasmid transfer events. Transfer was confirmed by plasmid purification and PCR. One colony was selected at random per successful coculture condition. Plasmid DNA was harvested from overnight cultures of bacteria, and DNA was purified using the GeneJET plasmid miniprep kit (K0502; Thermo Scientific) per the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR amplification was performed with gene-specific primers targeting the
In vitro coculture experiment.
The in vitro coculture experiment was designed as a selection process for candidate recipient strains that would most likely model successful horizontal gene transfer in downstream in planta and in vivo work. The AbzeoR donor strain and
Recipient strains JJ2528, 56428, 56663C, and 56307C were selected for horizontal gene transfer coculture on agar. Donor-recipient cocultures were grown overnight on nonselective TSA plates using a modified published protocol (21). Horizontal gene transfer was confirmed by scraping, resuspending, and plating the coculture on doubly selective EMB agar plates as previously described. Plating and plasmid transfer confirmations were performed using the same methods as for in vitro broth cocultures.
In planta coculture experiment.
Commercial lettuce contains high numbers of colonizing bacteria (22), which would have confounded our analysis of plasmid transfer. We therefore grew a commercial variety of
Leaf discs were collected using a cap punch method in a 2.0-ml microcentrifuge tube, and then half of the discs were surface sterilized in 70% ethanol for 30 s to eliminate background leaf microbiota. The sterilized leaf discs were air dried, and 20 μl of either phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (negative control), AbzeoR (donor),
In vivo colonization of mutant
Female, murine-pathogen-free BALB/c mice, 8 to 10 weeks of age, were obtained from Taconic Biosciences. A total of 12 mice (6 mice per treatment group) were used for the in vivo study. Adapted from previous publications, mice were treated with 200 μl of 100 mg/kg clindamycin once daily via subcutaneous injection for 4 days starting 2 days before infection and continuing through 1 day postinfection (25–27). Sterilized leaf tissue was homogenized in PBS to a concentration of 0.33 g/ml, which was the maximum density that could be used without compromising proper function of the feeding needles.
One stool pellet per mouse was collected on days −2, 0, 1, 2, and 5 for CFU quantification. Additionally, mouse stool pellets were collected before oral gavage on day 0. All fecal samples collected on day 0 were collected immediately before infection. Fecal samples were collected between 7 and 10 a.m., as described by others (28). Fecal pellets were homogenized in PBS by vortexing at maximum speed for 5 min. Serial dilutions were performed and plated in triplicate on EMB agar with 100 μg/ml AMP plus 50 μg/ml ZEO, and the plates were incubated overnight at 37°C.
Eleven isolates were selected at random from the doubly selective plates from days 1, 2, and 5, and horizontal gene transfer was confirmed by plasmid purification and PCR. Plasmid DNA were extracted, PCR amplified for the zeocin resistance gene with primers LEE35 and LEE36 (250 bp), and visualized on an ethidium bromide gel.
b Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
c Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
Antimicrobial Development Specialists, LLC
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2020 Maeusli et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Agricultural use of antibiotics is recognized by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a major contributor to antibiotic-resistant infections. While most One Health attention has been on the potential for antibiotic resistance transmission from livestock and contaminated meat products to people, plant foods are fundamental to the food chain for meat eaters and vegetarians alike. We hypothesized that environmental bacteria that colonize plant foods may serve as platforms for the persistence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and for horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic-resistant genes. Donor
IMPORTANCE Previous efforts have correlated antibiotic-fed livestock and meat products with respective antibiotic resistance genes, but virtually no research has been conducted on the transmission of antibiotic resistance from plant foods to the mammalian gut (C. S. Hölzel, J. L. Tetens, and K. Schwaiger, Pathog Dis 15:671–688, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2018.2501; C. M. Liu et al., mBio 9:e00470-19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00470-18; B. Spellberg et al., NAM Perspectives, 2016, https://doi.org/10.31478/201606d; J. O’Neill, Antimicrobials in agriculture and the environment, 2015; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019). Here, we sought to determine if horizontal transmission of antibiotic resistance genes can occur between lettuce and the mammalian gut microbiome, using a mouse model. Furthermore, we have created a new model to study horizontal gene transfer on lettuce leaves using an antibiotic-resistant transformant of
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer