It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Groundwater (GW) overexploitation is a critical issue in North China with large GW level declines resulting in urban water scarcity, unsustainable agricultural production, and adverse ecological impacts. One approach to addressing GW depletion was to transport water from the humid south. However, impacts of water diversion on GW remained largely unknown. Here, we show impacts of the central South-to-North Water Diversion on GW storage recovery in Beijing within the context of climate variability and other policies. Water diverted to Beijing reduces cumulative GW depletion by ~3.6 km3, accounting for 40% of total GW storage recovery during 2006–2018. Increased precipitation contributes similar volumes to GW storage recovery of ~2.7 km3 (30%) along with policies on reduced irrigation (~2.8 km3, 30%). This recovery is projected to continue in the coming decade. Engineering approaches, such as water diversions, will increasingly be required to move towards sustainable water management.
The authors here address water sustainability in the greater area of Beijing, China. Specifically, the positive effects towards Beijing groundwater levels via water diversion from the Yangtze River to the North are shown.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Tsinghua University, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178)
2 The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)
3 Beijing Water Authority, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33)
4 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (GRID:grid.75276.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 1955 9478)
5 Capital Normal University, College of Resources Environment and Tourism, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.253663.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 505X)
6 Huazhong Agricultural University, Macro Agriculture Research Institute (MARI), College of Economics and Management, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.35155.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1790 4137); International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, USA (GRID:grid.419346.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0480 4882)