It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Insecticides are the main method of controlling lepidopteran pests of eucalyptus plantations and those selective to natural enemies, such as the endoparasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare et LaSalle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), are preferable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity and effects on biological parameters of the insecticide deltamethrin, registered for the control of defoliator caterpillars of eucalyptus, to the parasitoid P. elaeisis aiming the rational use of this insecticide and its compatibility with parasitoids. The experiment was in a completely randomized design. The treatments were the doses of 0.64, 1.40, 3.10, 6.83, 15.03, 33.05, 72.7 and 160 mg a.i./L of deltamethrin and the control (distilled water) with 10 replications, each with a pupae of the alternative host Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) exposed by the immersion method. The parasitism, biological cycle, emergence, longevity, head width and metatibia length of the natural enemy were evaluated. Deltamethrin reduced parasitism and the emergence rates of P. elaeisis. The duration of the biological cycle of this parasitoid, emerged from T. molitor pupae exposed to 15.03 mg a.i./L of deltamethrin, was higher. The morphometric parameters of P. elaeisis exposed to the doses of 0.64 and 1.40 mg a.i./L of the insecticide were lower. However, the morphometric parameter values were higher with the doses above 3.10 mg a.i./L than in the control. The parasitism and emergence of P. elaeisis were also reduced by the deltamethrin doses lower than the commercially recommended one and therefore, this insecticide is not selective for this natural enemy.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Departamento de Agronomia, Diamantina, Brasil (GRID:grid.411287.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0643 9823)
2 Programa de Pós-graduação Em Biocombustíveis, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brasil (GRID:grid.411287.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0643 9823)
3 Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Diamantina, Brasil (GRID:grid.411287.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0643 9823)
4 Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Departamento de Fitotecnia, Viçosa, Brasil (GRID:grid.12799.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 8338 6359)
5 Instituto Federal de Mato Grosso - IFMT, Laboratório de Fitossanidade (FitLab), Cáceres, Brasil (GRID:grid.466834.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0370 1312)
6 Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO, Viçosa, Brasil (GRID:grid.12799.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 8338 6359)
7 Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Center for Medical, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.12799.34)