It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Angiosperms have become the dominant terrestrial plant group by diversifying for ~145 million years into a broad range of environments. During the course of evolution, numerous morphological innovations arose, often preceded by whole genome duplications (WGD). The mustard family (Brassicaceae), a successful angiosperm clade with ~4000 species, has been diversifying into many evolutionary lineages for more than 30 million years. Here we develop a species inventory, analyze morphological variation, and present a maternal, plastome-based genus-level phylogeny. We show that increased morphological disparity, despite an apparent absence of clade-specific morphological innovations, is found in tribes with WGDs or diversification rate shifts. Both are important processes in Brassicaceae, resulting in an overall high net diversification rate. Character states show frequent and independent gain and loss, and form varying combinations. Therefore, Brassicaceae pave the way to concepts of phylogenetic genome-wide association studies to analyze the evolution of morphological form and function.
As one of the most successful angiosperm clades with ~4000 species, the mustard family has been diversifying into many evolutionary lineages. Here, the authors construct plastid-based phylogeny and show nested whole-genome duplications coincide with diversification and high morphological disparity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 University of Heidelberg, Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 4373)
2 University of Heidelberg, Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 4373); Altai State University, South-Siberian Botanical Garden, Barnaul, Russia (GRID:grid.77225.35) (ISNI:0000000112611077)
3 University of Heidelberg, Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 4373); GYDLE, 1135 Grande Allée Ouest, Québec, Canada (GRID:grid.7700.0)
4 University of Heidelberg, Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 4373); Nanchang University, School of Life Sciences, Nanchang, China (GRID:grid.260463.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2182 8825)
5 Charles University, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.4491.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 116X)
6 University of Osnabrück, Department of Biology, Systematic Botany, Osnabrück, Germany (GRID:grid.10854.38) (ISNI:0000 0001 0672 4366)