It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Long-term time series have provided evidence that anthropogenic pressures can threaten lakes. Yet it remains unclear how and the extent to which lake biodiversity has changed during the Anthropocene, in particular for microbes. Here, we used DNA preserved in sediments to compare modern micro-eukaryotic communities with those from the end of the 19th century, i.e., before acceleration of the human imprint on ecosystems. Our results obtained for 48 lakes indicate drastic changes in the composition of microbial communities, coupled with a homogenization of their diversity between lakes. Remote high elevation lakes were globally less impacted than lowland lakes affected by local human activity. All functional groups (micro-algae, parasites, saprotrophs and consumers) underwent significant changes in diversity. However, we show that the effects of anthropogenic changes have benefited in particular phototrophic and mixotrophic species, which is consistent with the hypothesis of a global increase of primary productivity in lakes.
Sedimentary DNA can be used to infer how organisms responded to changing environmental conditions over millennia. Here, the authors use sedimentary DNA of micro-eukaryotes in low-elevation (human-impacted) and high-elevation (more pristine) lakes to show how human influences have altered lake community composition in the Anthropocene.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 INRAE, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CARRTEL, Thonon-les-Bains, France (GRID:grid.5388.6); Pole R&D ECLA, CARRTEL, Thonon-les-Bains, France (GRID:grid.5388.6)
2 CNRS, Chrono Environnement, Besançon, France (GRID:grid.5388.6)
3 Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Laboratoire Microorganismes: Genome et Environnement, Clermont-Ferrand, France (GRID:grid.494717.8) (ISNI:0000000115480420)
4 Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, Le Bourget du Lac, France (GRID:grid.5388.6); Pole R&D ECLA, CARRTEL, Thonon-les-Bains, France (GRID:grid.5388.6)
5 GEODE UMR 5602 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France (GRID:grid.11417.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2353 1689); Labex DRIIHM, OHM Pyrénées, CNRS/INEE, Toulouse, France (GRID:grid.11417.32)
6 CNRS, Chrono Environnement, Besançon, France (GRID:grid.11417.32)