Abstract
Cloud computing has become popular among individuals and enterprises due to its convenience, scalability, and flexibility. However, a major concern for many cloud service users is the rising cost of cloud resources. Since cloud computing uses a pay-per-use model, costs can add up quickly, and unexpected expenses can arise from a lack of visibility and control. The cost structure gets even more complicated when working with multi-cloud or hybrid environments. Businesses may spend much of their IT budget on cloud computing, and any savings can improve their competitiveness and financial stability. Hence, an efficient cloud cost management is crucial. To overcome this difficulty, new approaches and tools are being developed to provide greater oversight and command over cloud a graph-based approach for modelling cost elements and cloud resources and a potential way to solve the resulting constraint problem of cost optimisation. In this context, we primarily consider utilisation, cost, performance, and availability. The proposed approach is evaluated on three different user scenarios, and results indicate that it could be effective in cost modelling, cost optimisation, and scalability. This approach will eventually help organisations make informed decisions about cloud resource placement and manage the costs of software applications and data workflows deployed in single, hybrid, or multi-cloud environments.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway (GRID:grid.5947.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1516 2393)
2 KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.5037.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2158 1746)
3 University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria (GRID:grid.7520.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2196 3349)
4 Robert Bosch LLC, Sunnyvale, USA (GRID:grid.420831.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0529 6285)
5 SINTEF AS, Oslo, Norway (GRID:grid.4319.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0448 3150); OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway (GRID:grid.412414.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9151 4445)
6 OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway (GRID:grid.412414.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9151 4445)




