It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Use of CRISPR-Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated 9)-mediated genome editing has proliferated for use in numerous plant species to modify gene function and expression, usually in the context of either transient or stably inherited genetic alternations. While extremely useful in many applications, modification of some loci yields outcomes detrimental to further experimental evaluation or viability of the target organism. Expression of Cas9 under a promoter conferring gene knockouts in a tissue-specific subset of genomes has been demonstrated in insect and animal models, and recently in Arabidopsis. We developed an in planta GFP (green fluorescent protein) assay system to demonstrate fruit-specific gene editing in tomato using a phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase 2 gene promoter. We then targeted a SET-domain containing polycomb protein, SlEZ2, previously shown to yield pleiotropic phenotypes when targeted via 35S-driven RNA interference and we were able to characterize fruit phenotypes absent additional developmental perturbations. Tissue-specific gene editing will have applications in assessing function of essential genes otherwise difficult to study via germline modifications and will provide routes to edited genomes in tissues that could not otherwise be recovered when their germline modification perturbs their normal development.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Cornell University, Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
2 Cornell University, Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Cornell University, Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
3 Cornell University, Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Hefei University of Technology, School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.256896.6)
4 Cornell University, Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Cornell University, Section of Plant Biology, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
5 Hefei University of Technology, School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.256896.6)
6 Cornell University, Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Cornell University, Section of Plant Biology, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, US Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.507316.6)