It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite recent advances, the link between the evolution of atmospheric CO2 and climate during the Eocene greenhouse remains uncertain. In particular, modelling studies suggest that in order to achieve the global warmth that characterised the early Eocene, warmer climates must be more sensitive to CO2 forcing than colder climates. Here, we test this assertion in the geological record by combining a new high-resolution boron isotope-based CO2 record with novel estimates of Global Mean Temperature. We find that Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) was indeed higher during the warmest intervals of the Eocene, agreeing well with recent model simulations, and declined through the Eocene as global climate cooled. These observations indicate that the canonical IPCC range of ECS (1.5 to 4.5 °C per doubling) is unlikely to be appropriate for high-CO2 warm climates of the past, and the state dependency of ECS may play an increasingly important role in determining the state of future climate as the Earth continues to warm.
The relationship between atmospheric CO2 and climate during the Eocene greenhouse remains uncertain. Here authors show that Eocene CO2 and climate sensitivity was high during the warmest intervals and declined as global climate cooled, with implications for the Earth’s future warming climate.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; John, E H 2 ; Babila, T L 3
; Sexton, P F 4 ; Ridgwell, A 5
; Lunt, D J 6
; Pearson, P N 2
; Chalk, T B 3
; Pancost, R D 7 ; Foster, G L 3 1 GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.15649.3f) (ISNI:0000 0000 9056 9663); University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
2 Cardiff University, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff, UK (GRID:grid.5600.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0807 5670)
3 University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
4 The Open University, School of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Milton Keynes, UK (GRID:grid.10837.3d) (ISNI:0000000096069301)
5 University of California, Department of Earth Sciences, Riverside, USA (GRID:grid.266097.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2222 1582)
6 University of Bristol, University Rd, School of Geographical Sciences, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7603)
7 University of Bristol, Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry and School of Earth Sciences, Cabot Institute for the Environment, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7603)




